Comparative Trial Between 3 Types of Insulin Infusion Protocols
Comparative Trial Between Computer-Guided Intravenous Infusion Protocol Versus a Standard Insulin Infusion Algorithm Versus a Simple Calculated Infusion Protocol in Medical and Surgical ICU
1 other identifier
interventional
151
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Increasing evidence from observational studies in hospitalized patients with and without diabetes indicates that hyperglycemia is a predictor of poor outcome. Over the short-term, hyperglycemia can adversely affects fluid balance (through glycosuria and dehydration), impairs immunologic response to infection, and promotes inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. Blood glucose control with intensive insulin therapy in patients with acute critical illness reduces the risk of multiorgan failure and systemic infections, and decreases short- and long-term mortality . \- Hypotheses: we hypothesize that management of inpatient hyperglycemia with a computer-guided intravenous infusion protocol (Glucommander) will facilitate a smoother glycemic control with a lower rate of hypoglycemic events than treatment following a standard insulin infusion algorithm or a simple calculated infusion protocol in critically ill patients in the medical and surgical ICU.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2007
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 19, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 28, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 25, 2010
CompletedJune 23, 2015
May 1, 2015
1.3 years
December 19, 2007
September 12, 2009
May 26, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Differences in Glycemic Control as Measured by Time Reach Glycemic Control for Each Treatment Group.
The protocol were compared by measuring in each patient time to acquire the Blood Glucose (BG) target range (80-120 mg/dl) defined by reaching a BG \< 120, and maintaining the target range thereafter.
24 hours
Study Arms (3)
Glucommander
ACTIVE COMPARATORGlucommander-Guided Intravenous Insulin Infusion
Standard
ACTIVE COMPARATORStandard Intravenous Insulin Infusion Algorithm consists of four levels (Algorithm 1-3 and a doubling of the insulin rate). Most patients begin in algorithm 1, where the insulin rate varies from 0.2 units per hour for BG in the range 70-109 mg/dl up to 6 units/hr for BG \> 360 mg/dl. If algorithm 1 fails to bring the patient's BG into target range in 2 hrs, then the patient is moved up to algorithm 2, where the insulin rate varies from 0.5 to 12 units/hr; and if that fails, the patient moved up to algorithm 3, where insulin rate varies from 1 to 16 units/hr depending on the latest BG. Algorithm failure is a blood glucose outside the target range for 2 hrs, and the blood glucose does not decrease by at least 60 mg/dl within 1 hr. If algorithm 3 fails, the insulin rate is doubled.
Simple
ACTIVE COMPARATORSimple Calculated Intravenous Insulin Infusion consists of an initial insulin infusion rate varying from 0.5 units per hour for BG in the target range 80-120 mg/dl up to 8 units/hour for BG \> 400 mg/dl. After the initial insulin rate and if BG is still \> 120 mg/dl, then the insulin rate is increased by 1-2 units every 1 hour until BG is in the target range. If BG is still \>120 mg/dl in 2 hours, then the insulin rate is doubled.
Interventions
Glucommander-Guided Intravenous Insulin Infusion. * Prepare IV Insulin Drip: 250 units of glulisine (Apidra®) insulin with 250 ml NS (1.0 unit/ml). Piggyback insulin drip into IV fluids. * During the infusion, enter glucose levels into the Glucommander and follow recommendations regarding infusion rate and time to measure next blood glucose levels.
Standard Intravenous Insulin Infusion Standard Intravenous Insulin Infusion in the ICU setting Prepare IV Insulin Drip: 250 units of glulisine (Apidra®) insulin with 250 ml NS (1.0 unit/ml). Piggyback insulin drip into IV fluids. Algorithm 1: Start here for most patients. Algorithm 2: For patients not controlled with Algorithm 1, or receiving glucocorticoids, or patient with diabetes receiving \>80 units/day of insulin as an outpatient. Algorithm 3: For patients not controlled on Algorithm 2.No Patients Start Here.
If the patient was on insulin prior to this admission, 1/2 of the total insulin dose divided by 24 will be the initial insulin infusion rate. The amount of insulin given will be dependant upon blood sugar levels ( BG levels 80-120= 0.5 units/hr, 121-160=1.0 units/hr, 161-200= 2.0 units/hr, 201-240= 3.0 units/hr, 241-280= 4.0 units/hr, 281-320= 5.0 units/hr, 321-360=6.0 units, 361-400= 7.0 units, greater than 400= 8.0 units.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients who are admitted to Medical or Surgical ICU.
- History of diabetes mellitus
- Newly diagnosed hyperglycemia (defined as a blood glucose greater than 140 mg/dl on ≥ 2 occasions)
- Subjects must have an admission blood glucose \< 500 mg/dL, without laboratory evidence of diabetic ketoacidosis (serum bicarbonate \< 18 mEq/L or positive serum or urinary ketones).
You may not qualify if:
- Non-Diabetic patients
- Subjects with acute hyperglycemic crises such as diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state.
- Patients with known HIV
- Patients with severely impaired renal function (serum creatinine ≥3.0 mg/dl).
- Patients with mental condition rendering the subject unable to understand the nature, scope, and possible consequences of the study.
- Female subjects who are pregnant or breast feeding at time of enrollment into the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of New Mexicolead
- Sanoficollaborator
Study Sites (3)
St. James Hospital and Health Centers
Chicago Heights, Illinois, 60411, United States
Presbyterian Hospital
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87106, United States
University of New Mexico Hospital
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87131, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Limitations of trial. Variable length of stay the first 48 hours was analyzed as the sample size decreased after that.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Gary Iwamoto
- Organization
- UNM
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gary Iwamoto, M.D.
University of New Mexico
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 19, 2007
First Posted
December 28, 2007
Study Start
August 1, 2007
Primary Completion
December 1, 2008
Study Completion
December 1, 2008
Last Updated
June 23, 2015
Results First Posted
January 25, 2010
Record last verified: 2015-05