A Randomized, Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Peanut Sublingual Immunotherapy Trial
Sublingual Immunotherapy for Peanut Allergy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase I/II Pilot Study With a Whole Peanut Extract
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
5
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and immune response to daily sublingual (under the tongue) immunotherapy (SLIT) with peanut extract in adults and children with peanut allergies.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_1
Started Dec 2007
Longer than P75 for phase_1
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 18, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 25, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 30, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2014
CompletedAugust 21, 2019
August 1, 2019
3 years
December 18, 2007
September 28, 2012
August 12, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percent of Participants Who Successfully Consumed 5,000 mg of Peanut Powder or at Least a 10-fold Increase in the Amount of Peanut Powder Compared to Their Baseline Oral Food Challenge
Desensitization Assessment: Participants who successfully consumed without dose-limiting symptoms 5,000 mg of peanut powder or at least a 10-fold increase in the amount of peanut powder compared to their baseline oral food challenge during a double-blind placebo-controlled oral food challenge were counted as successes.
Week 44 (Double Blind Period)
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Percent of Participants Who Achieved a Maintenance Dose of 1,386 mcg
Week 44 (Double Blind Period)
Percent of Crossover Participants Who Successfully Consumed 5,000 mg of Peanut Powder or at Least a 10-fold Increase in the Amount of Peanut Powder Compared to Their Baseline Oral Food Challenge After 44 Weeks of Open Label Peanut Protein Consumption
Week 44 after initiating crossover open label peanut protein consumption
Percent of Crossover Participants Who Achieved an Open Label Peanut Protein Consumption Maintenance Dose of 3,696 mcg
Week 44 after initiating crossover open label peanut protein consumption
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Baseline through Week 44 (Double Blind Period)
Number of Crossover Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During 44 Weeks of Open Label Peanut Protein Consumption
Initiation of open label peanut protein study therapy through Week 44 of open label peanut protein consumption
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Low Dose Peanut SLIT (Double Blind to Open Label)
EXPERIMENTALSubjects ingest peanut protein (glycerinated peanut allergenic extract) daily starting with 0.000165 mcg, followed by a build-up phase (escalating peanut doses every 2 weeks, achieving maintenance dose by 36 weeks). Thereafter, subjects are on a maximally tolerated maintenance dose (165 mcg to 1,386 mcg) for \>= 8 weeks. After Week 44, subjects are given a 5,000 mg Oral Food Challenge (OFC) using peanut powder. Subjects/study staff are unblinded following this OFC and continue on an open label peanut protein maintenance dose of 1,386 mcg/day or may attempt escalation up to this dose. Subjects who at the Week 116 OFC are unable to consume \>= 5,000 mg peanut powder or 10-fold the amount of peanut powder compared to the baseline OFC will discontinue study therapy. SLIT=Sublingual Immunotherapy.
Placebo (DB) Crossed Over to High Dose Peanut SLIT (OL)
PLACEBO COMPARATORSubjects ingest placebo (glycerin) daily beginning with a dose of 0.000165 mcg, followed by a build-up phase (escalating placebo doses every 2 weeks, achieving a maintenance dose by 36 weeks). Thereafter, subjects are on a maximally tolerated maintenance dose (165 mcg to 1,386 mcg) for \>= 8 weeks. After Week 44, subjects are given a 5,000 mg Oral Food Challenge (OFC) using peanut powder. Subjects/study staff are unblinded following this OFC and subjects no longer receive placebo dosing but are crossed over and receive open label high dose peanut SLIT; the study procedures and schedule are the same as for the Low Dose Peanut SLIT group, the only difference is the maximum maintenance dose is almost 3-fold higher at 3,696 mcg/day. DB=Double Blind, SLIT=Sublingual Immunotherapy, OL=Open Label.
Interventions
Glycerinated peanut extract delivered sublingually.
Placebo (glycerin) delivered sublingually.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Physician-diagnosed peanut allergy OR convincing clinical history of peanut allergy
- Reacts to a cumulative dose of 2,000 mg or less of peanut powder
- Positive peanut allergy skin prick test OR detectable serum peanut-specific IgE level
- Willing to use an acceptable method of contraception for the duration of the study
- Ability to perform spirometry maneuver in accordance with the American Thoracic Society guidelines
You may not qualify if:
- History of severe anaphylaxis to peanut
- Currently participating in a study using a new investigational new drug
- Participation in any interventional study for the treatment of food allergy in the 12 months prior to study entry
- Allergic to placebo ingredients (glycerin or oat flour) OR reacts to any dose of placebo during study entry oral food challenge (OFC)
- Currently in a buildup phase of any allergy immunotherapy
- Poor control of atopic dermatitis
- Moderate or severe asthma despite therapy
- Current treatment with greater than medium daily doses of inhaled corticosteroids
- Use of steroid medications
- Use of omalizumab or other nontraditional forms of allergen immunomodulatory therapy (not including corticosteroids) or biologic therapy in the 12 months prior to study entry
- Use of beta blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers, or calcium channel blockers
- Inability to discontinue antihistamines for skin testing and OFCs
- History of ischemic cardiovascular disease
- History of alcohol or drug abuse
- Other significant medical conditions that, in the opinion of the investigator, prevent participation in the study
- +3 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (5)
University of Arkansas
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72202, United States
National Jewish Medical and Research Center
Denver, Colorado, 80208, United States
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Baltimore, Maryland, 21218, United States
Mount Sinai School of Medicine
New York, New York, 10029, United States
University of North Carolina
Durham, North Carolina, 27706, United States
Related Publications (5)
de Leon MP, Rolland JM, O'Hehir RE. The peanut allergy epidemic: allergen molecular characterisation and prospects for specific therapy. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2007 Jan 9;9(1):1-18. doi: 10.1017/S1462399407000208.
PMID: 17210088BACKGROUNDEnrique E, Cistero-Bahima A. Specific immunotherapy for food allergy: basic principles and clinical aspects. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006 Dec;6(6):466-9. doi: 10.1097/01.all.0000246618.41871.a4.
PMID: 17088653BACKGROUNDSicherer SH, Sampson HA. Peanut allergy: emerging concepts and approaches for an apparent epidemic. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Sep;120(3):491-503; quiz 504-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.07.015. Epub 2007 Aug 8.
PMID: 17689596BACKGROUNDFleischer DM, Burks AW, Vickery BP, Scurlock AM, Wood RA, Jones SM, Sicherer SH, Liu AH, Stablein D, Henning AK, Mayer L, Lindblad R, Plaut M, Sampson HA; Consortium of Food Allergy Research (CoFAR). Sublingual immunotherapy for peanut allergy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Jan;131(1):119-27.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.11.011.
PMID: 23265698RESULTBurks AW, Wood RA, Jones SM, Sicherer SH, Fleischer DM, Scurlock AM, Vickery BP, Liu AH, Henning AK, Lindblad R, Dawson P, Plaut M, Sampson HA; Consortium of Food Allergy Research. Sublingual immunotherapy for peanut allergy: Long-term follow-up of a randomized multicenter trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015 May;135(5):1240-8.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.12.1917. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
PMID: 25656999RESULT
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Refer to the original results published in the Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Vol 135, Number 5, page 1247 for a full description of the limitations of the current study.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Director, Clinical Research Operations Program
- Organization
- DAIT/NIAID
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Wesley Burks, MD
Duke University
- STUDY CHAIR
David Fleischer, MD
National Jewish Health
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hugh A. Sampson, MD
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stacie Jones, MD
Arkansas Children's Hospital Research Institute
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Robert Wood, MD
Johns Hopkins University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- NIH
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 18, 2007
First Posted
December 25, 2007
Study Start
December 1, 2007
Primary Completion
December 1, 2010
Study Completion
December 1, 2014
Last Updated
August 21, 2019
Results First Posted
October 30, 2012
Record last verified: 2019-08