Peanut Allergy Vaccine Study in Healthy and Peanut-allergic Adults
A Phase 1 Study of Heat/Phenol-Killed, E. Coli-Encapsulated, Recombinant Modified Peanut Proteins Ara h 1, Ara h 2, and Ara h 3 (EMP 123) in Healthy Volunteers Followed by Subjects Allergic to Peanuts (CoFAR 1)
3 other identifiers
interventional
15
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and side effects of a study product that contains recombinant modified peanut proteins (EMP-123) in healthy and peanut-allergic participants. This is a first in human study. As of November 2009, this study is no longer recruiting healthy volunteers and will only be recruiting individuals with peanut allergies.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_1
Started Oct 2009
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 24, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 25, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2010
CompletedMay 27, 2013
May 1, 2013
1 year
February 24, 2009
May 23, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of participants who successfully complete the dosage regimen with no more than mild symptoms related to EMP-123 dosing
Throughout study
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Occurrence of adverse events
Throughout study
Rate of desensitization, as determined by peanut endpoint titration prick test in peanut allergic participants
At pre- and post-treatment periods
Change in basophil activation
Throughout study
Decreased Type 2 helper T cell peanut-induced T-lymphocyte phenotype and increased T-lymphocyte regulatory phenotype
Throughout study
Increase in peanut-specific immunoglobulin (IgG4) and IgA
Throughout study
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
EMP-123
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants who are not allergic to peanuts will receive four escalating doses of study product on a weekly basis
EMP-123 in Peanut Allergics
EXPERIMENTALParticipants who are allergic to peanuts will receive weekly dose escalation of the study product for 10 weeks followed by administration every 2 weeks for 6 weeks
Interventions
Up to 7 mL solution administered rectally
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Available for the duration of the trial
- Ability to perform spirometry maneuvers
- Agree to use effective methods of contraception for the duration of the study
- For Step 1 participants, regular consumption of at least 5 grams of peanut at least twice per month during the last 6 months prior to study entry
- For Step 2 participants, a convincing clinical history of peanut allergy and prick skin test positive to peanut. More information on these criteria can be found in the protocol.
You may not qualify if:
- History of any severe anaphylaxis
- Known allergy to hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, glycerol, or phenol
- Evidence of clinically significant immunosuppressive neurologic, cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic, rheumatologic, autoimmune, or renal disease
- Laboratory evidence of liver or hematologic disease. Pre-existing history of autoimmune or antibody mediated diseases. More information on this criterion can be found in the protocol.
- Pre-existing history of autoimmune or antibody mediated diseases. More information on this criterion can be found in the protocol.
- Any previous intubation due to allergies or asthma
- History of ischemic cardiovascular disease
- Uncontrolled hypertension
- Significant medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with the study
- Chronic diarrhea
- Inability to refrain from anal intercourse for the duration of the trial
- Use of rectal medications during the study
- Planned rectal procedures for the duration of the study
- History of rectal surgery or bleeding in the last 6 months prior to study entry
- History of proctitis in the last 6 months prior to study entry
- +26 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Allertein Therapeutics, LLClead
- Consortium of Food Allergy Researchcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, United States
Mount Sinai Medical Center
New York, New York, 10029, United States
Related Publications (2)
Rolland JM, Gardner LM, O'Hehir RE. Allergen-related approaches to immunotherapy. Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Mar;121(3):273-84. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2008.11.007. Epub 2008 Dec 7.
PMID: 19111571BACKGROUNDSicherer SH, Sampson HA. Peanut allergy: emerging concepts and approaches for an apparent epidemic. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Sep;120(3):491-503; quiz 504-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.07.015. Epub 2007 Aug 8.
PMID: 17689596BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Robert A. Wood, MD
Johns Hopkins University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Scott Sicherer, MD
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 24, 2009
First Posted
February 25, 2009
Study Start
October 1, 2009
Primary Completion
October 1, 2010
Study Completion
October 1, 2010
Last Updated
May 27, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-05