Mechanism and Efficacy of Rehabilitation Approaches
Mechanisms and Long-term Effects of Separate vs. Coupled Rehabilitation Approaches After Stroke
2 other identifiers
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Identify the possible mechanisms and the relative effectiveness of existing rehabilitation approaches that target upper extremity deficits of stroke patients on the ground that these approaches are based on neuroplasticity principles and sound motor control theories.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2008
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 25, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 27, 2007
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2010
CompletedFebruary 11, 2015
September 1, 2014
2.9 years
November 25, 2007
February 10, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Cortical reorganization and kinematic analysis
2008-2010
Secondary Outcomes (1)
clinical measures at the impairment, activity, participation levels
2008-2010
Study Arms (4)
1
EXPERIMENTALconstraint-induced therapy
2
EXPERIMENTALbilateral arm training
3
EXPERIMENTALcombined therapy
Control intervention
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
restraint of the unaffected arm and practice of the affected arm
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- a first-ever clinical cerebrovascular accident patients
- at least 6 months post-stroke onset
- premorbid right-hand dominance
- demonstration of Brunnstrom stage III of the affected upper extremity
- no excessive spasticity in the joints of the affected upper extremity
You may not qualify if:
- a score of less than 24 on the Mini Mental State Exam
- poor physical conditions that would interfere with participation
- excessive pain in any joint that might limit participation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Kwei-shan, Toayuan County, 333, Taiwan
Related Publications (1)
Wu CY, Chen YA, Lin KC, Chao CP, Chen YT. Constraint-induced therapy with trunk restraint for improving functional outcomes and trunk-arm control after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther. 2012 Apr;92(4):483-92. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20110213. Epub 2012 Jan 6.
PMID: 22228607DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ching-yi Wu, ScD
Department of Occupational Therapy, Chang Gung Univ.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 25, 2007
First Posted
November 27, 2007
Study Start
January 1, 2008
Primary Completion
December 1, 2010
Study Completion
December 1, 2010
Last Updated
February 11, 2015
Record last verified: 2014-09