Comparison of Hormonal Therapy: Mediating Hot Flashes Tapering Regimens for Mediating Hot Flashes
A Comparison of Hormonal Therapy: Tapering Regimens for Mediating Hot Flashes
1 other identifier
interventional
235
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will evaluate whether there is a difference in the proportion of women who report a worsening severity of their hot flashes between three tapering schedules for one accepted HT/ET regimen. Secondarily, we hope to evaluate whether there is a difference in the frequency (number of occurrences per week), severity (defined as a subjective scale mild, moderate, or severe), and "Severity Index" (SI, equaling the product of both) of hot flashes between three tapering schedules for one accepted HT/ET regimen.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2007
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 17, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 19, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2009
CompletedJuly 18, 2008
July 1, 2008
October 17, 2007
July 17, 2008
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To evaluate whether there is a difference in the proportion of women who report a worsening severity of their hot flashes between three tapering schedules for one accepted HT/ET regimen.
During the tapering and post taper time period.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
frequency, severity, and "Severity Index" of hot flashes.
During the tapering and post taper time period.
Study Arms (3)
1
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup A will be tapered over 4 weeks, starting at baseline (week 0). Subjects in this group will take one tablet of ET daily (effective dose, 0.75 mg) for week 1, then one 0.50 mg tablet daily for week 2, then one 0.25 mg tablet daily for week 3, and finally one 0.125 mg tablet daily for week 4.
2
PLACEBO COMPARATORGroup B will be administered placebo. These tablets will appear identical to those administered to subjects in Group A, but the tablets will contain no estrogen. Subjects in this group will be instructed to take one pill every day for the 4 weeks. Thus, while patients will, in effect, be stopped abruptly from their therapy, there is still the potential of a placebo effect.
3
NO INTERVENTIONGroup C will have their therapy discontinued acutely at baseline (week 0); i.e., these subjects will not take any tablets after the 8-week stabilization phase ends. While we recognize that this group will not be blinded to the regimen they are receiving, we feel that group C will be important to include in light of the consistent decrease in vasomotor symptoms experienced by women taking placebo. Because women taking placebo have approximately a 35% decrease in vasomotor symptoms, it will be important to compare our taper regimen to the "real life" scenario of stopping medication abruptly.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female.
- ages 35-70, inclusive.
- Postmenopausal (Natural or surgical: see definitions).
- Currently on HT/ET for at least 6 months for vasomotor symptomatology.
- Vasomotor symptoms are currently controlled on medication .
- An annual physical \& pelvic exam has been performed within the last 12mo
- The patient has had a normal mammogram(BIRADS I/II) within the last 24mo
You may not qualify if:
- Males
- Hypertension, defined as either SBP \>140 mmHg or DBP \>90 mmHg
- Lack of compliance (willingness to adhere to protocol)
- Inability or unwillingness to swallow pills
- Patients with any contraindications to HT/ET
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hartford Hospital
Hartford, Connecticut, 06102, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Peter F. Schnatz, D.O.
Hartford Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 17, 2007
First Posted
October 19, 2007
Study Start
August 1, 2007
Study Completion
November 1, 2009
Last Updated
July 18, 2008
Record last verified: 2008-07