Breathe for Hot Flashes Randomized Controlled Trial
Breathe-intervention for Hot Flashes, Associated Outcomes, and Interference
2 other identifiers
interventional
218
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: Paced respiration has been internationally recommended for vasomotor symptom management despite limited empirical evidence. Objective: To evaluate efficacy of a paced respiration intervention against a sham comparator breathing control and usual care control for vasomotor and other menopausal symptoms. Design: A 16-week, 3-group, partially blinded, controlled trial with 2:2:1 randomization and stratification by group (breast cancer, no cancer), Midwestern city and surrounding area. Participants: 218 randomized women (96 breast cancer survivors, 122 menopausal women without cancer) recruited through community mailings and registries. Interventions: Training, home practice support, and instructions to use the breathing at the time of each hot flash were delivered via compact disc with printed booklet (paced respiration intervention) or digital videodisc with printed booklet (fast shallow breathing control). Usual care control received a letter regarding group assignment. Main Measures: Hot flash frequency, severity, and bother (primary), hot flash interference in daily life, perceived control over hot flashes, and mood and sleep disturbances (secondary). Intervention performance, adherence, and adverse events were assessed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2008
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 7, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 8, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 28, 2014
CompletedMarch 24, 2016
February 1, 2016
3.2 years
January 7, 2009
May 1, 2013
February 24, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Hot Flash Frequency
Prospective, real-time electronic diary used by participants for a minimum of 24 hours to a maximum of 7 days. Duration of use was determined by participant choice.
16 weeks
Hot Flash Severity
Self-reported rating using a scale from 0 (not at all severe) to 10 (extremely severe). Calculated as 24 hour averages at 16 week timepoint.
16 weeks
Hot Flash Bother
Self-reported rating using a scale from 0 (not at all bothersome) to 10 (extremely bothersome). Calculated as 24 hour averages at 16 week timepoint.
16 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Hot Flash Related Daily Interference
16 weeks
Perceived Control Over Hot Flashes
16 weeks
Mood Disturbance
16 weeks
Sleep Disturbance
16 weeks
Other Outcomes (3)
Intervention Performance
2 weeks
Intervention Performance
16 weeks
Intervention Adherence
16 weeks
Study Arms (3)
Paced respiration
EXPERIMENTALThe paced respiration intervention group received a compact disc with paper booklet. The booklet reinforced instructions on the first audio track for how to accomplish a target breath rate of 6-8 breaths per minute, practice twice per day for 15 minutes, and apply the breathing at the onset of each hot flash. Women were instructed to do slow, deep, abdominal breathing in through the nose and out through the mouth as per international recommendations (4). They were also instructed to practice twice per day for 15 minutes as per the small, laboratory-based studies (5, 6). The second and third tracks contained specially composed, digitally recorded music to help entrain the breath rate and structure the length of practice.
Sham comparator: Fast, shallow breathing
SHAM COMPARATORThe sham comparator group received a digital videodisc with paper booklet. The booklet reinforced voice-over and video demonstration to practice twice per day and apply the fast shallow breathing at the onset of each flash. A previously published report provides additional details and data indicating this program was a suitable attention control.
Control: Usual Care
NO INTERVENTIONThe usual care group received an investigator-signed letter explaining they were not selected to receive any study materials during the 16-week follow-up. These participants received paced respiration materials by mail after study completion.
Interventions
sham breathing exercise
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- At least 18 years of age
- Reporting daily hot flashes and desirous of hot flash treatment
- Peri- or post menopausal
- Living within a 60-mile radius of Indianapolis or willing to drive to the center for all study visits
- Able to read, write, and speak English
- in good general health
- In addition:
- Breast Cancer survivors will have a known diagnosis of non-metastatic disease
- No history of other cancers
- Be at least four weeks post-completion of surgery, radiation and chemotherapy
You may not qualify if:
- Known psychiatric disorders or cognitive impairments
- Participation in our previous pilot study evaluating our control condition
- Self-reported difficulties with normal everyday breathing
- Meet criteria at baseline for number of subjective and/or objective hot flashes
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Indiana Universitylead
- National Institutes of Health (NIH)collaborator
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Indiana University School of Nursing
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States
Related Publications (1)
Carpenter JS, Burns DS, Wu J, Otte JL, Schneider B, Ryker K, Tallman E, Yu M. Paced respiration for vasomotor and other menopausal symptoms: a randomized, controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Feb;28(2):193-200. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2202-6.
PMID: 22936289RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Janet S Carpenter, PhD, RN, FAAN
- Organization
- Indiana University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Janet S Carpenter, PhD, RN
Indiana University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 7, 2009
First Posted
January 8, 2009
Study Start
April 1, 2008
Primary Completion
June 1, 2011
Study Completion
February 1, 2013
Last Updated
March 24, 2016
Results First Posted
February 28, 2014
Record last verified: 2016-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
De-identified data available upon request.