TMC278-TiDP6-C215: A Clinical Trial in Treatment Naive HIV-subjects Patients Comparing TMC278 to Efavirenz in Combination With 2 Nucleoside/Nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
A Phase III, Randomized, Double-blind Trial of TMC278 25mg q.d. Versus Efavirenz 600mg q.d. in Combination With a Background Regimen Containing 2 Nucleoside/Nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors in Antiretroviral-naive HIV-1 Infected Subjects.
2 other identifiers
interventional
680
20 countries
82
Brief Summary
The purpose of this trial is to compare the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of TMC278 given at a dose of 25 mg once daily versus efavirenz (EFV) at a dose of 600 mg once daily, when combined with a background regimen containing 2 nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors ( investigator choice of ABC/3TC, TDF/FTC or AZT/3TC) in HIV-1 infected patients who have not yet taken any anti-HIV drugs. The following evaluations will be done: antiviral activity, immunologic changes, and viral geno-/phenotype evolution, relationship of Pharmacokinetics (PK) and PK/Pharmacodynamics and Medical resource utilization and treatment adherence.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3 hiv-infections
Started Jun 2008
Typical duration for phase_3 hiv-infections
82 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 11, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 15, 2007
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 12, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2012
CompletedApril 1, 2016
March 1, 2016
1.6 years
October 11, 2007
June 14, 2011
March 3, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Virological Response (Intent-to-Treat - Time to Loss of Virologic Response [TLOVR], <50 Copies Per mL) at Week 48
Virological response is defined as confirmed plasma viral load less than (\<) 50 human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) (ribonucleic acid \[RNA\]) copies/milliliter (ml) at Week 48. The TLOVR algorithm was used to derive response. Response needed to be confirmed at 2 consecutive visits and participants who permanently discontinued were considered nonresponders after discontinuation. Resuppression after confirmed virologic failure was considered as failure. Virologic Failure includes participants who were rebounder (confirmed viral load \>= 50 copies/ml after being responder) or who were never suppressed (no confirmed viral load \<50 copies/ml).
Week 48
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Number of Participants With Virological Response (Intent-to-Treat - Snapshot, <50 Copies Per mL) at Week 48
Week 48
Number of Participants With Virological Response (Intent-to-Treat - Time to Loss of Virologic Response [TLOVR], <50 Copies Per mL) at Week 96
Week 96
Number of Participants With Virological Response (Intent-to-Treat - Snapshot, <50 Copies Per mL) at Week 96
Week 96
Number of Participants With Virological Response (Observed, <50 Copies/mL) at Last On-Treatment Visit (Post-Week 96).
Variable, ranging from 3 months up to maximum 18 months for TMC278 and 12 months for Efavirenz
Number of Participants With Virological Response (Intent-to-Treat - Time to Loss of Virologic Response [TLOVR], <400 Copies Per mL) at Week 48
Week 48
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
002
ACTIVE COMPARATORefavirenz 600 mg tablet once daily for 96 weeks
001
EXPERIMENTALTMC278 25 mg tablet once daily for 96 weeks
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient with documented HIV-1 infection
- Patient has never been treated with a therapeutic HIV vaccine or an ARV drug prior to screening
- Patient's HIV-1 plasma viral load at screening is \> 5,000 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL (assayed by RNA PCR standard specimen procedure)
- Patient's virus is sensitive to the 2 nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors chosen for treatment
- Patient agrees not to start ART before the baseline visit
- Patient is HLA-B\*5701 negative in case abacavir is included in the patient's treatment regimen.
You may not qualify if:
- Previous use of ANY ARV drug for ANY length of time
- Any documented evidence of NNRTI resistance associated mutations in patient's HIV
- Category C AIDS defining illness, except, Stable Kaposi Sarcoma Wasting syndrome if not progressive
- Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) that is considered not cured
- Active TB
- Allergy or hypersensitivity to study or background ARTs
- Specific grade 3 or 4 toxicity
- Kidney impairment: calculated creatinine clearance \<50 ml/min
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (82)
Unknown Facility
Long Beach, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Los Angeles, California, United States
Unknown Facility
San Francisco, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Unknown Facility
Atlantis, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Miami, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Miami Beach, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Orlando, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Tampa, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Unknown Facility
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Unknown Facility
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Unknown Facility
Springfield, Massachusetts, United States
Unknown Facility
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Unknown Facility
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Unknown Facility
Newark, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
Flushing, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
New York, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Rochester, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
The Bronx, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Dallas, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Houston, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Longview, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Darlinghurst, Australia
Unknown Facility
Prahran, Australia
Unknown Facility
Surry Hills, Australia
Unknown Facility
Antwerp, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Brussels, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Ghent, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Leuven, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Campinas, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Distrito Barao Geraldo-Campina, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Pinheiros, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Recife, Brazil
Unknown Facility
SĂ£o Paulo, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Unknown Facility
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Unknown Facility
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Unknown Facility
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Unknown Facility
Providencia, Chile
Unknown Facility
Santiago, Chile
Unknown Facility
Beijing, China
Unknown Facility
Guangzhou, China
Unknown Facility
Shanghai, China
Unknown Facility
San José, Costa Rica
Unknown Facility
Clamart, France
Unknown Facility
Le Kremlin-BicĂªtre, France
Unknown Facility
Montpellier, France
Unknown Facility
Paris, France
Unknown Facility
Berlin, Germany
Unknown Facility
Cologne, Germany
Unknown Facility
Essen, Germany
Unknown Facility
Frankfurt, Germany
Unknown Facility
Hamburg, Germany
Unknown Facility
Hanover, Germany
Unknown Facility
Mannheim, Germany
Unknown Facility
Chennai, India
Unknown Facility
Nagpur, India
Unknown Facility
Guadalajara, Mexico
Unknown Facility
Mexico City, Mexico
Unknown Facility
Panama City, Panama
Unknown Facility
Porto, Portugal
Unknown Facility
San Juan, Puerto Rico
Unknown Facility
Moscow, Russia
Unknown Facility
Saint Petersburg, Russia
Unknown Facility
Smolensk, Russia
Unknown Facility
Voronezh, Russia
Unknown Facility
Bloemfontein, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Cape Town, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Dundee, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Johannesburg, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Pretoria, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Westdene Johannesburg Gauteng, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Barcelona, Spain
Unknown Facility
Elche, Spain
Unknown Facility
Madrid, Spain
Unknown Facility
Bangkok, Thailand
Unknown Facility
London, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Manchester, United Kingdom
Related Publications (3)
Rimsky L, Van Eygen V, Hoogstoel A, Stevens M, Boven K, Picchio G, Vingerhoets J. 96-Week resistance analyses of rilpivirine in treatment-naive, HIV-1-infected adults from the ECHO and THRIVE Phase III trials. Antivir Ther. 2013;18(8):967-77. doi: 10.3851/IMP2636. Epub 2013 May 28.
PMID: 23714781DERIVEDNelson M, Amaya G, Clumeck N, Arns da Cunha C, Jayaweera D, Junod P, Li T, Tebas P, Stevens M, Buelens A, Vanveggel S, Boven K; ECHO and THRIVE Study Groups. Efficacy and safety of rilpivirine in treatment-naive, HIV-1-infected patients with hepatitis B virus/hepatitis C virus coinfection enrolled in the Phase III randomized, double-blind ECHO and THRIVE trials. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012 Aug;67(8):2020-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks130. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
PMID: 22532465DERIVEDCohen CJ, Andrade-Villanueva J, Clotet B, Fourie J, Johnson MA, Ruxrungtham K, Wu H, Zorrilla C, Crauwels H, Rimsky LT, Vanveggel S, Boven K; THRIVE study group. Rilpivirine versus efavirenz with two background nucleoside or nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors in treatment-naive adults infected with HIV-1 (THRIVE): a phase 3, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2011 Jul 16;378(9787):229-37. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60983-5.
PMID: 21763935DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Medical Leader
- Organization
- Janssen Infectious Diseases BVBA
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Tibotec Pharmaceuticals, Ireland Clinical Trial
Tibotec Pharmaceuticals, Ireland
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- GT60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 11, 2007
First Posted
October 15, 2007
Study Start
June 1, 2008
Primary Completion
January 1, 2010
Study Completion
February 1, 2012
Last Updated
April 1, 2016
Results First Posted
July 12, 2011
Record last verified: 2016-03