Myfortic vs. Cellcept in Kidney Transplant Recipients
Head to Head Comparison of Myfortic vs. Cellcept in the Treatment of Kidney Transplant Recipients Using Our Current Center Standardized Concomitant Immunosuppressive Protocol
1 other identifier
interventional
150
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The comparison the incidence of G.I. toxicity between Myfortic® vs. Cellcept® in 150 sequential patients, in which 75 will be randomized to Cellcept® and 75 to Myfortic® in first and second living or deceased donor renal transplant recipients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Dec 2004
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2004
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 19, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 21, 2007
CompletedSeptember 28, 2023
September 1, 2023
September 19, 2007
September 25, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Observation of G.I. toxicity (nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea). One year patient and graft survival after initiation of study agent.Incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (vide infra). 4. Incidence of chronic allograft nephropathy (vide infra).
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Incidence of AE: Infections, malignancies (including PTLD), thromboembolic events, hyperlipidemia and leuko and thrombocytopenia, cytokine release syndrome with induction antibody agents, wound healing and lymphocele, post-tx diabetes.
1 year
Study Arms (2)
1: Myfortic
ACTIVE COMPARATORMyfortic Group: Myfortic® 1,440 mg/day in two divided doses (induced with either the IL-2 receptor inhibitors or thymoglobulin). Tacrolimus will be dosed to 12-hour trough levels of 8-10 ng/ml. Methylprednisolone is to be given as per our center protocols, weaning to dose levels of \<0.1 mg/kg by 3-6 months post-operatively.
2. Cellcept
ACTIVE COMPARATORCellcept® 2,000 mg/day, in divided doses (induced with either the IL-2 receptor inhibitors or thymoglobulin). Tacrolimus will be dosed to 12-hour trough levels of 8-10 ng/ml. Methylprednisolone is to be given as per our center protocols, weaning to dose levels of \<0.1 mg/kg by 3-6 months post-operatively.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient has been fully informed and has signed a dated IRB approval informed consent form and is willing to follow study procedures for the extent of the study (12 months). Parent or legal guardian must provide written consent for patients \<18 years of age.
- Age 18-75 years.
- Weight \> 40 kg.
- Primary or secondary renal allograft: living or deceased donor.
- Negative standard crossmatch for T cells.
- Women of childbearing potential will be required to have a negative qualitative serum pregnancy test and agree to use an adequate method of contraception for the study duration.
- Males and females are to be studied equivalently as they become available for transplantation using these criteria.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient has previously received or is receiving an organ transplant other than a kidney.
- Patient is receiving an ABO incompatible donor kidney.
- Recipient or donor is seropositive for human immunodeficiency (HIV), Hepatitis C viruses, or Hepatitis B virus antigenemia.
- Patient has a current malignancy or a history of malignancy (within the past 5 years), except non-metastatic basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin that has been treated successfully, or carcinoma in situ of the cervix that has been treated successfully.
- Patients with significant liver disease, defined as having during the past 28 days continuously elevated AST (SGOT) and/or ALT (SGPT) levels greater than 3 times the upper value of the normal range of this center.
- Patient has uncontrolled concomitant infections and/or severe diarrhea, vomiting, active upper gastro-intestinal tract malabsorption or an active peptic ulcer or any other unstable medical condition that could interfere with study objectives.
- Patient is currently participating in another clinical trial of an investigational drug in the 30 days prior to transplant.
- Patient will be receiving any immunosuppressive agent other than those prescribed in the study.
- Patient is unable to take medications orally or via nasogastric tube by the morning of the second day following completion of the transplant procedure (i.e., skin closure) (Group I only).
- Patient is receiving or may require warfarin, fluvastatin, or herbal supplements during the study.
- Concurrent use of astemizole, pimozide, cisapride, terfenadine, or ketoconazole.
- Patient has a known hypersensitivity to tacrolimus, thymoglobulin, IL-2 receptor inhibitor monoclonal antibodies, sirolimus, MMF, Myfortic®, or corticosteroids.
- Patient is pregnant or lactating.
- Patients with a screening/baseline (or within 96 hours of transplant) total white blood cell count \<4000/mm3; platelet count \<100,000/mm3; fasting triglycerides \>400 mg/dl (\>4.6 mmol/L); fasting total cholesterol \>300 mg/dl (\>7.8 mmol/L); fasting HDL-cholesterol \<30 mg/dl; fasting LDL-cholesterol \>200 mg/dl.
- Patient is unlikely to comply with the visits scheduled in the protocol.
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Miamilead
- Novartis Pharmaceuticalscollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Miami Miller School of Medicine
Miami, Florida, 33136, United States
Related Publications (1)
Ciancio G, Gaynor JJ, Sageshima J, Roth D, Kupin W, Guerra G, Tueros L, Zarak A, Hanson L, Ganz S, Chen L, Ruiz P, Livingstone AS, Burke GW 3rd. Machine perfusion following static cold storage preservation in kidney transplantation: donor-matched pair analysis of the prognostic impact of longer pump time. Transpl Int. 2012 Jan;25(1):34-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2011.01364.x. Epub 2011 Oct 8.
PMID: 21981661DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
George W Burke, M.D.
University of Miami
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 19, 2007
First Posted
September 21, 2007
Study Start
December 1, 2004
Study Completion
February 1, 2006
Last Updated
September 28, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-09