Study Stopped
Two participants enrolled, both inevaluable.
Spectroscopy Versus Standard Care in Cervical Cancer Patients
A Randomized Trial of Spectroscopy Versus Standard Care in Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
1 other identifier
interventional
2
2 countries
3
Brief Summary
Primary objectives
- 1.To conduct a randomized clinical trial of the emerging technology fluorescence and reflectance spectroscopy, comparing colposcopy to colposcopy + spectroscopy in the diagnostic setting, stratifying patients by outside Papanicolaou (Pap) smear of low grade and high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, and to use multispectral digital colposcopy retrospectively.
- 2.To see if optical spectroscopy using both the point probe and the multi-spectral device improves diagnosis by improving specificity over colposcopy alone.
- 3.To study the number of colposcopically directed biopsies that show High-grade Squamous Intraepithelial or cancer.
- 4.To study the number of LEEP specimens that show HGSIL or cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Nov 2006
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 12, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 14, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 8, 2010
CompletedMay 9, 2016
December 1, 2012
1.8 years
September 12, 2007
September 1, 2009
April 5, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Unnecessary Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedures (LEEP)
A LEEP is unnecessary if histological examination results in diagnosis of low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or normal. Comparison of 3 arms (colposcopy to colposcopy + spectroscopy, colposcopy + LEEP Procedure) in the diagnostic setting, stratifying participants by outside Papanicolaou (Pap) smear of low grade and high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, and to use multispectral digital colposcopy retrospectively, in identifying unnecessary LEEPs performed.
Up to 2 years
Study Arms (3)
Colposcopy
EXPERIMENTALColposcopy - a direct magnified inspection of cervix
Colposcopy + Fluorescence Spectroscopy
EXPERIMENTALColposcopy - a direct magnified inspection of cervix + Fluorescence Spectroscopy - electromagnetic spectroscopy which analyzes fluorescence from a sample.
Colposcopy + LEEP Procedure
EXPERIMENTALColposcopy - a direct magnified inspection of cervix + loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) - thin, low-voltage electrified wire loop to cuts out cervix abnormal tissue.
Interventions
Pictures of the cervix will be taken before and after the application of acetic acid. A clean probe will be placed against the cervix that sends out light and reads how much light is absorbed by the tissue.
A standard colposcopy will be performed.
A small heated wire loop is used to remove a cone-shaped piece of abnormal tissue. Procedure is performed on the same day as the colposcopy exam.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients 18 years and older
- Non-pregnant
- Patients with abnormal smears with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (both low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions equal to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1-3)
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who have had cytotoxic chemotherapy within 12-months prior to enrolling in this study, since the chemotherapy often induces change in the cervix.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- M.D. Anderson Cancer Centerlead
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
Study Sites (3)
Lyndon Baines Johnson General Hospital
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
UT MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
British Columbia Cancer Research Centre
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1L3, Canada
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
This study was terminated due to difficulty enrolling subjects.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Helen E. Rhodes, MD / Assistant Professor
- Organization
- UT MD Anderson Cancer Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Helen E. Rhodes, MD
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 12, 2007
First Posted
September 14, 2007
Study Start
November 1, 2006
Primary Completion
August 1, 2008
Study Completion
August 1, 2008
Last Updated
May 9, 2016
Results First Posted
December 8, 2010
Record last verified: 2012-12