Bromfenac 0.09% vs Ketorolac 0.4% for Cyclosporine Induction Phase
Bromfenac 0.09% vs. Ketorolac 0.4% During the Induction Phase of Treatment With Topical Cyclosporine for Chronic Dry Eye Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
42
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To compare bromfenac 0.09% and ketorolac 0.4% when used concomitantly with cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% in improving patient comfort during the induction phase of treatment for chronic dry eye disease
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Aug 2007
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 21, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 23, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2008
CompletedFebruary 19, 2009
February 1, 2009
1 year
August 21, 2007
February 17, 2009
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Ocular comfort
six weeks
Study Arms (2)
1
ACTIVE COMPARATORActive treatment arm bromfenac 0.09% BID for 6 weeks
2
ACTIVE COMPARATORketorolac 0.4% BID for 6 weeks
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Must be in general good health
- Diagnosis of moderate to severe dry eye syndrome
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who are unlikely to respond to cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion therapy
- Patients who are pregnant or nursing females
- Unwilling to discontinue use of contact lenses during the run-in and duration of the study
- Presence or history of any systemic or ocular disorder or condition that could possibly interfere with the interpretation of the study results in the study eye
- Previous treatment failure on CSA 0.05% (Restasis)
- Known hypersensitivity to any component of the study or procedural medications
- Participation in any other clinical trial within 30 days prior to screening
- Known contraindication to any study medication or any of their components.
- Should not be taking any oral anti-histamines, beta blockers or diuretics.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Florida Eye Microsurgical Institutelead
- Bausch & Lomb Incorporatedcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Florida Eye Microsurgical Institute
Boynton Beach, Florida, 33426, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Barry Schechter, MD
Florida Eye Microsurgical Institute
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 21, 2007
First Posted
August 23, 2007
Study Start
August 1, 2007
Primary Completion
August 1, 2008
Study Completion
August 1, 2008
Last Updated
February 19, 2009
Record last verified: 2009-02