Functional Behavioural Skill Training for Young Children With Severe Autism
1 other identifier
interventional
32
1 country
1
Brief Summary
LAY SUMMARY: IBI is costly and there are currently long waitlists of children who are in need of treatment. The investigators have clinical and ethical obligations to determine more appropriate alternatives to IBI for children making few gains because all children with autism deserve treatment based on their needs. This study is designed to determine the effectiveness of a functional skills group intervention, based on the principles of applied behaviour analysis, for children responding slowly to IBI. Specifically, it will investigate the effectiveness of functional behavioural skills training in addition to IBI at increasing a child's independence in day to day communication and self-help skills and reducing behaviour problems, as well as increasing parental competence and decreasing caregiver strain compared with IBI alone. Having an effective alternative to IBI for children making few gains is relevant from the standpoint of i) preventing exposure to potentially intrusive interventions for those children making few gains in IBI, ii) allowing children making few gains in IBI to access effective treatment, iii) opening limited IBI spots for children who would benefit from IBI, and iv) making better use of limited health resources. Overall, the results will be of interest to parent, clinicians, researchers and funding bodies. HYPOTHESES Four main hypotheses are presented to examine the effectiveness of involvement in the ABA functional skills group in improving parent training and functional skills and behaviour in young children with ASD who do not master the ELM. We focus our hypotheses on child measures of functional self help skills, behaviour and cognition as well as parental measures of caregiver strain and sense of competence. Participants (i.e. children predicted to have poor response to IBI alone) who attend the functional skills group for 8 months will have:
- 1.greater decreases in interfering behaviour as measured on the Developmental Behaviour Checklist and ratings of behaviour during observations compared to children receiving IBI alone.
- 2.greater increases in self-help as measured on the Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scales II, and greater independence in eating, toileting, requesting, hand washing, and responding to name as measured by independent ratings of these skills compared with those children receiving IBI alone.
- 3.parents of these children will have greater improvements in their sense of competence as a parent and greater reductions in caregiver strain, compared with parents of children receiving IBI alone.
- 4.a similar pattern of little or no change in cognitive function compared with children who receive only IBI based on the Stanford Binet. In other words, there will be no difference between the experimental and control group on the measure of cognitive functioning
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2007
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 17, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 21, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2009
CompletedDecember 5, 2008
July 1, 2008
August 17, 2007
December 4, 2008
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Parenting Sense of Competence
Before entry to and upon exit from the intervention
Child Behavioural Skills Assessment
Before entry to and upon exit from the intervention
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Child Intellectual Functioning
Before entry to and upon exit from the intervention
Child Language Functioning
Before entry to and upon exit from the intervention
Child Adaptive Behaviour
Before entry to and upon exit from the intervention
Child Maladaptive Behaviour
Before entry to and upon exit from the intervention
Caregiver Strain
Before entry to and upon exit from the intervention
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children receiving Intensive Behavioural Intervention from the Hamilton Niagara Regional Early Autism Intervention Program who do not master the Early Learning Measure after 4 months of treatment
You may not qualify if:
- Children receiving Intensive Behavioural Intervention from the Hamilton Niagara Regional Early Autism Intervention Program who master the Early Learning Measure after 4 months of treatment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
McMaster University
1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4L8, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jo-Ann Reitzel, PhD.
McMaster University, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 17, 2007
First Posted
August 21, 2007
Study Start
August 1, 2007
Study Completion
August 1, 2009
Last Updated
December 5, 2008
Record last verified: 2008-07