An Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of E2007 in Patients With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of E2007 in Patients With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy
2 other identifiers
interventional
352
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of Perampanel in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Jun 2007
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 20, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 23, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 8, 2013
CompletedJuly 11, 2014
February 1, 2013
1.1 years
July 20, 2007
October 23, 2012
June 26, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Change in Average Pain Scores From Baseline to Week 15/End of Treatment (EOT)
Average of last 7 available scores prior to the visit, based on 11-point Likert-type numerical rating scale for pain (0=no pain, to 10=worst possible pain). This is based on a modified baseline observation carried forward (BOCF).
Baseline to Week 15/EOT
Responder Rate: Analysis of the Change in Pain Score From Baseline to Week 15/EOT in Subjects Who Had at Least a 30% Reduction in Pain Score
Average pain scores were calculated as the average of last 7 available scores prior to the visit, based on 11-point Likert-type numerical rating scale for pain (0=no pain, to 10=worst possible pain). This is based on a modified BOCF.
Baseline to Week 15/EOT
Responder Rate: Analysis of the Change in Pain Score From Baseline to Week 15/EOT in Subjects Who Had at Least a 50% Reduction in Pain Score
Average pain scores were calculated as the average of last 7 available scores prior to the visit, based on 11-point Likert-type numerical rating scale for pain (0=no pain, to 10=worst possible pain). This is based on a modified BOCF.
Baseline to Week 15/EOT
Mean Change in Average Pain Scores From Baseline at Each Study Week
Average pain scores were calculated as the average of last 7 available scores prior to the visit, based on 11-point Likert-type numerical rating scale for pain (0=no pain, to 10=worst possible pain). Last on-treatment value refers to last 7 days of available diary data while subject was on double-blind study drug.
Baseline, Week 1 to Week 17
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Change in Average Sleep Interference Scores From Baseline to Week 15/EOT
Baseline to Week 15/EOT
Change in Short Form - McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) From Baseline to Week 15/EOT
Baseline and Week 15/EOT
Analysis of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 15/EOT
Week 15/EOT
Change From Baseline to Week 15/EOT in SF-36 Physical and Mental Component Scores
Baseline and Week 15/EOT
Change From Baseline to Week 15/EOT in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Anxiety and Depression Subscale Scores
Baseline and Week 15/EOT
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (5)
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORPerampanel 2mg
ACTIVE COMPARATORPerampanel 4mg
ACTIVE COMPARATORPerampanel 6mg
ACTIVE COMPARATORPerampanel 8mg
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Perampanel, 2 mg once daily, for 15 weeks (taken orally).
Perampanel, 2 mg once daily for three weeks, followed by 4 mg, once daily, for 12 weeks (taken orally).
Perampanel, 2 mg once daily for three weeks, followed by 4 mg once daily, for three weeks and 6 mg, once daily, for nine weeks (taken orally).
Perampanel, 2 mg once daily, for three weeks, followed by 4 mg, once daily for three weeks, 6 mg once daily for three weeks and 8 mg, once daily, for six weeks (taken orally).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- To be included, patients must meet all of the following:
- Provide written informed consent, prior to entering the study or undergoing any study procedures
- Male and female patients ≥18 years of age will be eligible for enrollment. Females should be either not of childbearing potential as a result of surgery or menopause (1 year after onset), or of childbearing potential and practicing a medically acceptable method of contraception (e.g., abstinence, a barrier method plus spermicide, or intrauterine device \[IUD\]) for at least 1 month before Screening (Visit 1) and for 1 month after the end of the study (Visit 8). They must also have a negative serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-hCG) at Screening (Visit 1). Those females using hormonal contraceptives must also be using an additional approved method of contraception (e.g., a barrier method plus spermicide or IUD) starting with the Baseline Phase and continuing throughout the study period.
- Have Type I or Type II diabetes with painful, distal, symmetrical, sensory-motor neuropathy attributed to diabetes, of at least 12 months duration
- Have pain that has been stable over the past 6 months and, in the opinion of the investigator, not in an identifiably improving or worsening trend
- Have hemoglobin A1c ≤ 11%
- Score of ≥ 40 mm on the visual analog scale (VAS) of the short form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) at both Screening (Visit 1) and Baseline (Visit 2 prior to randomization)
- Have completed the patient diary for at least 6 of the 7 days prior to Baseline (Visit 2)
- Have average daily pain score of ≥ 4, on 11-point Likert-type numeric rating scale during the 7 days prior to Baseline (to be obtained from the patient diary)
- Be reliable, willing, and able to cooperate with all study procedures including the following:
- accurately fill out the diary on a daily basis
- return for study visits on the required dates
- accurately and reliably report symptoms (including treatment-emergent signs and symptoms)
- take study drug as required by protocol
- Be on stable antidiabetic treatment (insulin, oral agents, or lifestyle) that is not anticipated to change during the course of the study, except if medically required
- +1 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with any one of the following will be excluded.
- Patients with any condition that could interfere with the conduct of the study or confound efficacy evaluations including the following:
- Pain or neuropathy from another cause (including central pain, radiculopathy, painful arthritis, etc.)
- Skin or soft-tissue lesions in the area affected by neuropathy that are painful or could alter sensation
- Amputation, other than toes
- Patients motivated by secondary gain, or where there is a negative-incentive to achieving pain and functional pain relief (eg, litigation). This will be determined by the patient's medical history.
- Patients with clinically significant, progressive, or potentially unstable disease of any body system including cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, CNS, psychiatric, endocrine (other than diabetes), or immunologic, including patients with any of the following broad disease categories:
- Systemic infections (e.g., human immunodeficiency virus \[HIV\], hepatitis, tuberculosis \[TB\], syphilis)
- History of past (within the past 12 months) or present drug or alcohol abuse as per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual - 4th Edition (DSM IV) criteria
- History of acute coronary syndrome within the past 12 months
- Active cancer within the previous 5 years
- Systemic chemotherapy or immunotherapy within the past 5 years
- History of major depression, bipolar disease, psychosis or suicidal ideation or attempts within the past 5 years
- Patients with any of the following laboratory abnormalities at Screening (Visit 1) or Baseline (Visit 2):
- Clinically significant electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormality, including prolonged QTc (defined as QTc ≥ 450 msec)
- +5 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Eisai Inc.lead
- Eisai Limitedcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Dr. Richard Blonsky
Chicago, Illinois, 60610, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Eisai Inc.
- Organization
- Eisai Call Center
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Antonio Laurenza, M.D.
Eisai Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 20, 2007
First Posted
July 23, 2007
Study Start
June 1, 2007
Primary Completion
July 1, 2008
Study Completion
July 1, 2008
Last Updated
July 11, 2014
Results First Posted
February 8, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-02