NCT00505284

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of Perampanel in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
352

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2007

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2007

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 20, 2007

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 23, 2007

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2008

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2008

Completed
4.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 8, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

July 11, 2014

Status Verified

February 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

July 20, 2007

Results QC Date

October 23, 2012

Last Update Submit

June 26, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

Diabetic neuropathy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Change in Average Pain Scores From Baseline to Week 15/End of Treatment (EOT)

    Average of last 7 available scores prior to the visit, based on 11-point Likert-type numerical rating scale for pain (0=no pain, to 10=worst possible pain). This is based on a modified baseline observation carried forward (BOCF).

    Baseline to Week 15/EOT

  • Responder Rate: Analysis of the Change in Pain Score From Baseline to Week 15/EOT in Subjects Who Had at Least a 30% Reduction in Pain Score

    Average pain scores were calculated as the average of last 7 available scores prior to the visit, based on 11-point Likert-type numerical rating scale for pain (0=no pain, to 10=worst possible pain). This is based on a modified BOCF.

    Baseline to Week 15/EOT

  • Responder Rate: Analysis of the Change in Pain Score From Baseline to Week 15/EOT in Subjects Who Had at Least a 50% Reduction in Pain Score

    Average pain scores were calculated as the average of last 7 available scores prior to the visit, based on 11-point Likert-type numerical rating scale for pain (0=no pain, to 10=worst possible pain). This is based on a modified BOCF.

    Baseline to Week 15/EOT

  • Mean Change in Average Pain Scores From Baseline at Each Study Week

    Average pain scores were calculated as the average of last 7 available scores prior to the visit, based on 11-point Likert-type numerical rating scale for pain (0=no pain, to 10=worst possible pain). Last on-treatment value refers to last 7 days of available diary data while subject was on double-blind study drug.

    Baseline, Week 1 to Week 17

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Change in Average Sleep Interference Scores From Baseline to Week 15/EOT

    Baseline to Week 15/EOT

  • Change in Short Form - McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) From Baseline to Week 15/EOT

    Baseline and Week 15/EOT

  • Analysis of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 15/EOT

    Week 15/EOT

  • Change From Baseline to Week 15/EOT in SF-36 Physical and Mental Component Scores

    Baseline and Week 15/EOT

  • Change From Baseline to Week 15/EOT in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Anxiety and Depression Subscale Scores

    Baseline and Week 15/EOT

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (5)

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR
Drug: Placebo

Perampanel 2mg

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: E2007 (2 mg)

Perampanel 4mg

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: E2007 (4 mg)

Perampanel 6mg

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: E2007 (6 mg)

Perampanel 8mg

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: E2007 (8 mg)

Interventions

Placebo tablets, once daily, for 15 weeks (taken orally).

Placebo

Perampanel, 2 mg once daily, for 15 weeks (taken orally).

Also known as: Perampanel
Perampanel 2mg

Perampanel, 2 mg once daily for three weeks, followed by 4 mg, once daily, for 12 weeks (taken orally).

Also known as: Perampanel
Perampanel 4mg

Perampanel, 2 mg once daily for three weeks, followed by 4 mg once daily, for three weeks and 6 mg, once daily, for nine weeks (taken orally).

Also known as: Perampanel
Perampanel 6mg

Perampanel, 2 mg once daily, for three weeks, followed by 4 mg, once daily for three weeks, 6 mg once daily for three weeks and 8 mg, once daily, for six weeks (taken orally).

Also known as: Perampanel
Perampanel 8mg

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • To be included, patients must meet all of the following:
  • Provide written informed consent, prior to entering the study or undergoing any study procedures
  • Male and female patients ≥18 years of age will be eligible for enrollment. Females should be either not of childbearing potential as a result of surgery or menopause (1 year after onset), or of childbearing potential and practicing a medically acceptable method of contraception (e.g., abstinence, a barrier method plus spermicide, or intrauterine device \[IUD\]) for at least 1 month before Screening (Visit 1) and for 1 month after the end of the study (Visit 8). They must also have a negative serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-hCG) at Screening (Visit 1). Those females using hormonal contraceptives must also be using an additional approved method of contraception (e.g., a barrier method plus spermicide or IUD) starting with the Baseline Phase and continuing throughout the study period.
  • Have Type I or Type II diabetes with painful, distal, symmetrical, sensory-motor neuropathy attributed to diabetes, of at least 12 months duration
  • Have pain that has been stable over the past 6 months and, in the opinion of the investigator, not in an identifiably improving or worsening trend
  • Have hemoglobin A1c ≤ 11%
  • Score of ≥ 40 mm on the visual analog scale (VAS) of the short form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) at both Screening (Visit 1) and Baseline (Visit 2 prior to randomization)
  • Have completed the patient diary for at least 6 of the 7 days prior to Baseline (Visit 2)
  • Have average daily pain score of ≥ 4, on 11-point Likert-type numeric rating scale during the 7 days prior to Baseline (to be obtained from the patient diary)
  • Be reliable, willing, and able to cooperate with all study procedures including the following:
  • accurately fill out the diary on a daily basis
  • return for study visits on the required dates
  • accurately and reliably report symptoms (including treatment-emergent signs and symptoms)
  • take study drug as required by protocol
  • Be on stable antidiabetic treatment (insulin, oral agents, or lifestyle) that is not anticipated to change during the course of the study, except if medically required
  • +1 more criteria

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with any one of the following will be excluded.
  • Patients with any condition that could interfere with the conduct of the study or confound efficacy evaluations including the following:
  • Pain or neuropathy from another cause (including central pain, radiculopathy, painful arthritis, etc.)
  • Skin or soft-tissue lesions in the area affected by neuropathy that are painful or could alter sensation
  • Amputation, other than toes
  • Patients motivated by secondary gain, or where there is a negative-incentive to achieving pain and functional pain relief (eg, litigation). This will be determined by the patient's medical history.
  • Patients with clinically significant, progressive, or potentially unstable disease of any body system including cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, CNS, psychiatric, endocrine (other than diabetes), or immunologic, including patients with any of the following broad disease categories:
  • Systemic infections (e.g., human immunodeficiency virus \[HIV\], hepatitis, tuberculosis \[TB\], syphilis)
  • History of past (within the past 12 months) or present drug or alcohol abuse as per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual - 4th Edition (DSM IV) criteria
  • History of acute coronary syndrome within the past 12 months
  • Active cancer within the previous 5 years
  • Systemic chemotherapy or immunotherapy within the past 5 years
  • History of major depression, bipolar disease, psychosis or suicidal ideation or attempts within the past 5 years
  • Patients with any of the following laboratory abnormalities at Screening (Visit 1) or Baseline (Visit 2):
  • Clinically significant electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormality, including prolonged QTc (defined as QTc ≥ 450 msec)
  • +5 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Dr. Richard Blonsky

Chicago, Illinois, 60610, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetic Neuropathies

Interventions

perampanel

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Peripheral Nervous System DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesNervous System DiseasesDiabetes ComplicationsDiabetes MellitusEndocrine System Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Eisai Inc.
Organization
Eisai Call Center

Study Officials

  • Antonio Laurenza, M.D.

    Eisai Inc.

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 20, 2007

First Posted

July 23, 2007

Study Start

June 1, 2007

Primary Completion

July 1, 2008

Study Completion

July 1, 2008

Last Updated

July 11, 2014

Results First Posted

February 8, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-02

Locations