Efficacy of Irbesartan/Hydrochlorothiazide Versus Valsartan/Hydrochlorothiazide in Mild to Moderate Hypertension
COSIMA2
A Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Irbesartan/Hydrochlorothiazide 300/25 mg Versus Valsartan/Hydrochlorothiazide 160/25 mg Using Home Blood Pressure Monitoring in the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Hypertension
1 other identifier
interventional
1,617
14 countries
14
Brief Summary
The primary objective is to compare the efficacy of irbesartan/hydrochlorothiazide 300/25mg against valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide 160/25mg in reducing mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) as measured by home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) after 24 weeks compared with baseline. The secondary objectives are:
- To compare the percentage of patients with normal blood pressure as measured by HBPM and at the doctor's office at weeks 16 and 24
- To compare the differences in mean Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), mean morning and evening SBP and DBP evaluated by HBPM at weeks 16 and 24
- To compare the difference in mean SBP evaluated by HBPM at week 16
- To compare the differences in mean SBP and DBP evaluated at the doctor's office at weeks 16 and 24
- To determine the incidence and severity of adverse events
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4 hypertension
Started Jul 2007
Typical duration for phase_4 hypertension
14 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 11, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 12, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2010
CompletedJuly 19, 2010
July 1, 2010
2.5 years
July 11, 2007
July 16, 2010
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Reduction in mean SBP as measured by HBPM
From week 0 to week 24
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Reduction in mean DBP as measured by HBPM
From week 0 to weeks 16 and 24
Reduction in mean morning and evening SBP as measured by HBPM
From week 0 to weeks 16 and 24
Reduction in mean morning and evening DBP as measured by HBPM
From week 0 to weeks 16 and 24
Reduction in mean SBP and mean DBP evaluated at the doctor's office
From week 0 to weeks 16 and 24
Number of normalised patients as measured by HBPM
From week 0 to weeks 16 and 24
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
A
EXPERIMENTAL* period 1: Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg for 3-5 weeks * period 2: One 150/12.5mg tablet every morning for 8 weeks. * period 3: One 300/12.5mg tablet every morning for 8 weeks. * period 4: Two 150/12.5mg tablets every morning for 8 weeks.
B
ACTIVE COMPARATOR* period 1: Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg for 3-5 weeks * period 2: One 80/12.5mg tablet every morning for 8 weeks. * period 3: One 160/12.5mg tablet every morning for 8 weeks. * period 4: Two 80/12.5mg tablets every morning for 8 weeks.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Established essential hypertension, untreated or treated but uncontrolled with treatment:
- Office SBP ≥ 160 mmHg for untreated patients
- Office SBP ≥ 140 mmHg for patients already treated with an antihypertensive drug.
- Previous antihypertensive therapy must have been implemented for a minimum of 4 weeks and must be either monotherapy or one of the following permitted combination drugs:
- ACE inhibitor / calcium channel blocker
- Beta blocker / calcium channel blocker
- Beta blocker / low dose diuretic
- ACE inhibitor / low dose diuretic
You may not qualify if:
- SBP ≥ 180 mmHg and/or DBP ≥ 110 mmHg evaluated at doctor's office at Visit 1
- Known or suspected causes of secondary hypertension
- Patient with bilateral renal artery stenosis, renal artery stenosis in a solitary kidney, a renal transplant or only has one functioning kidney
- Type 1 diabetes mellitus
- Significant cardiovascular, neurological, endocrine, renal, metabolic, or gastrointestinal disease, a malignancy or any other diseases considered by the Investigator to make participation in the study not in the best interest of the subject
- Known hypersensitivity to diuretics or sulphonamides or history of angioedema or cough related to the administration of an angiotensin II receptor antagonist or any combination of the drugs used
- Known contraindications to any of the study drugs
- Concomitant use of any other antihypertensive treatment
- Use of any of the investigational products for this study within the 3 months prior to the study
- Inability to obtain a valid HBPM recording i.e., obesity, arm circumference \> 32 cm or arrhythmia
- Administration of any other investigational drug in the last 30 days before enrolment and during the course of the study
- Pregnant or breast-feeding women
- Women of childbearing potential not protected by effective contraceptive method of birth control and/or who are unwilling or unable to be tested for pregnancy
- The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a patient's potential participation in a clinical trial.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Sanofilead
Study Sites (14)
Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
Cairo, Egypt
Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
Mumbai, India
Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
Jakarta, Indonesia
Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
Casablanca, Morocco
Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
Karachi, Pakistan
Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
Makati City, Philippines
Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
Singapore, Singapore
Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
Seoul, South Korea
Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
Taipei, Taiwan
Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
Bangkok, Thailand
Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
Mégrine, Tunisia
Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Benedict Blayney
Sanofi
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 11, 2007
First Posted
July 12, 2007
Study Start
July 1, 2007
Primary Completion
January 1, 2010
Study Completion
January 1, 2010
Last Updated
July 19, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-07