An Expert System to Reduce Depression in Primary Care
1 other identifier
interventional
902
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a home-based intervention matched to stage of change (readiness) for using effective methods to prevent or reduce depression can improve depression outcomes in primary care.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2 depression
Started Jul 2003
Typical duration for phase_2 depression
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2003
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2006
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 5, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 9, 2007
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 7, 2015
CompletedFebruary 17, 2021
February 1, 2021
2.9 years
July 5, 2007
June 22, 2011
February 12, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Depression Severity
Depression was assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory, 2nd Edition (BDI-II)(Beck, Steer, \& Brown, 1996). In this self-report measure, 21 symptoms of depression are rated on a 0-3 scale. Scores for the 21 items are summed to yield a total score ranging from 0 to 63. The change scores reported here are the difference between the total BDI-II scores at baseline and 9 months (i.e., 9 months minus baseline). Change scores range from -63 to +63, with larger negative scores indicating greater reduction in depression.
Baseline, 9 months
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Number of Participants Exhibiting a Reliable and Clinically Significant Change in Depression Severity
9 months
Number of Participants in the Action or Maintenance Stage for Using Effective Methods to Prevent Depression.
9 months
Number Participants Without Major Depression at Baseline Who Experienced the Onset of Major Depression During Follow-up
9 months
Number of Participants Taking Prescribed Antidepressant Medication (Medication Adherence)
9 months
Change in Physical Functioning
Baseline, 9 months
Study Arms (2)
Computer-tailored intervention
EXPERIMENTALStage-based manual and three computer-tailored reports
Usual care
NO INTERVENTIONUsual primary care treatment
Interventions
Stage-based manual and three computer-tailored reports
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- At risk for or experiencing depression (i.e., Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI) score of 10 or higher; current major depression, minor depression, or dysthymia; or past major depression, minor depression, or dysthymia)
You may not qualify if:
- Younger than age 18
- Involved in counseling or planning counseling in the next 30 days
- Suicidal ideation
- Severe depression (BDI \> 28) and deemed inappropriate for study by site clinician
- BDI \<10 and in the Maintenance stage for using effective methods to prevent or reduce depression
- History of bipolar disorder
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Pro-Change Behavior Systemslead
- Harvard Vanguard Medical Associatescollaborator
- Cook County Healthcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
John H. Stroger Hospital
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates
Newton, Massachusetts, 02466, United States
Related Publications (1)
Levesque DA, Van Marter DF, Schneider RJ, Bauer MR, Goldberg DN, Prochaska JO, Prochaska JM. Randomized trial of a computer-tailored intervention for patients with depression. Am J Health Promot. 2011 Nov-Dec;26(2):77-89. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.090123-QUAN-27.
PMID: 22040388RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
1. There was only a single follow up assessment administered at 9 months post-baseline. 2. The study attrition rate was \> 30%.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Deborah A. Levesque, Ph.D.
- Organization
- Pro-Change Behavior Systems, Inc.
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Deborah A. Levesque, Ph.D.
Pro-Change Behavior Systems, Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 5, 2007
First Posted
July 9, 2007
Study Start
July 1, 2003
Primary Completion
June 1, 2006
Study Completion
June 1, 2006
Last Updated
February 17, 2021
Results First Posted
July 7, 2015
Record last verified: 2021-02