Study Stopped
Recruitment was stopped on 15 June 2009 (early termination date) due to low prevalence of study population and slow accrual.
Study of Oral LBH589 in Adult Participants With Refractory/Resistant Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (CTCL)
A Phase II Study of Oral LBH589 in Adult Patients With Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Who Are Intolerant to or Have Progressed on or After Prior HDAC Inhibitor
1 other identifier
interventional
9
1 country
18
Brief Summary
This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of LBH589B in adult participants with refractory/resistant Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma and prior Histone Deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor therapy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2
Started Jul 2007
18 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 21, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 25, 2007
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 5, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 22, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 18, 2021
CompletedAugust 18, 2021
August 1, 2021
2.2 years
June 21, 2007
April 29, 2021
August 16, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Overall Response Rate (ORR) in Participants With Resistant Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (CTCL) Treated With Oral Panobinostat by Using the Modified Severity-Weighted Assessment Tool (mSWAT)
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with best overall response (OR) of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on mSWAT score, (OR = CR + PR). mSWAT score represents the product of the percentage total body surface area (%TBSA) involvement of each lesion type (patch, plaque, and tumor or ulceration), multiplied by a weighting factor: modified SWAT score = (patch %TBSA x 1) + (plaque %TBSA x 2) + (tumor or ulcer %TBSA x 4). The sum of these 3 numbers gave the modified SWAT score, on a 0 (no lesions) to 400 (lesions covering all areas) scale. CR based on mSWAT score was defined as the absence of skin disease. PR was defined as ≥ 50% decrease of the modified SWAT score compared to the Baseline score.
From first dose of study drug up to disease progression or death, (up to approximately 2 years)
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Response Rate of Participants With Refractory CTCL Using the Physician's Global Assessment of Clinical Condition (PGA)
From first dose of study drug up to disease progression or death, (up to approximately 2 years)
Response Rate in Participants With Refractory CTCL Using Modified Skin Score
From first dose of study drug up to disease progression or death, (up to approximately 2 years)
Responses in Index Lesions in Participants With Refractory CTCL by Lesion Measurements With Photographic Supporting Documentation
From first dose of study drug up to disease progression or death (up to approximately 2 years)
ORR of Participants With Resistant CTCL Treated With Oral Panobinostat by Using the Modified PGA to Assess Skin Disease and the Evaluation of Disease in the Viscera, Lymph Nodes and Blood (Circulating Sézary Syndrome Cells)
From first dose of study drug up to disease progression or death, (up to approximately 2 years)
Duration of Response (DOR)
From first dose of study drug up to disease progression or death, (up to approximately 2 years)
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Panobinostat 20 mg
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received panobinostat, 20 milligrams (mg), capsules, orally, thrice weekly on alternate Days 1, 3, and 5 per week of a 28-day treatment cycle until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, and/or physician's discretion to discontinue the treatment.
Interventions
Panobinostat, 20 mg, hard gelatin capsules, orally, thrice weekly.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Written informed consent obtained prior to any screening procedures
- Age greater than or equal to 18 years old
- Participants with biopsy-confirmed stages IB-IVA mycosis fungoides or Sézary syndrome (SS). Participants with SS who have bone marrow involvement are also eligible. Participants with transformed CTCL are eligible
- Participants must have been treated with an HDAC inhibitor given for the treatment of CTCL. Participants must have had disease progression on or following treatment with an HDAC inhibitor. Participants are also eligible if they had an inadequate response to an HDAC inhibitor defined as stable disease as the best response after at least 3 months of therapy. Participants previously treated with an HDAC inhibitor are also eligible if they experienced intolerance due to adverse events.
- Baseline multiple-gated acquisition scan (MUGA) or echocardiogram must have demonstrated left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ the lower limit of the institutional normal
- ECOG performance status ≤ 2
You may not qualify if:
- Participants with a history of visceral disease including central nervous system (CNS) involvement (i.e. stage IVB CTCL). Note, participants who have SS with bone marrow involvement are eligible
- Impaired cardiac function
- Concomitant use of drugs with a risk of causing torsades de pointes
- Participants who have received chemotherapy or any investigational drug or undergone major surgery ≤ 3 weeks prior to starting study drug or who have not recovered from side effects of such therapy
- Less than 3 months since prior electron beam therapy
- Women who are pregnant or breast feeding, or women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) not willing to use a double method of contraception during the study and 3 months after the end of treatment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (18)
University of Alabama at Birmingham/ The Kirklin Clinic
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233, United States
UCLA Medical Center School of Medicine/ Dpt of Hematology-Oncology
Los Angeles, California, 90095, United States
University of Colorado Health Sciences Center/Anschutz Cancer Pavillion
Aurora, Colorado, 80010, United States
Florida Academic Dermatology Centers
Miami, Florida, 33136, United States
Medical College of Georgia
Augusta, Georgia, 30912, United States
Rush Presbyterian Hospital/St. Luke's Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
St. Louis University Cancer Cennter
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
Nebraska Medical Center
Omaha, Nebraska, 68198, United States
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Buffalo, New York, 14263, United States
NYU Clinical Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10016, United States
Our Lady of Mercy Medical Center/Comprehensive Cancer Center
The Bronx, New York, 10466, United States
Wake University Health Sciences
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States
University of Oklahoma-Tulsa
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74104, United States
Craig Okada
Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States
University of Pittsburg Medical Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States
The Jones Clinic
Germantown, Tennessee, 38138, United States
MD Anderson Cancer Center/University of Texas
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
Seattle, Washington, 98109-102, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The study was terminated early due to low accrual, no formal efficacy analyses were conducted for this study.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Study Director
- Organization
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 21, 2007
First Posted
June 25, 2007
Study Start
July 5, 2007
Primary Completion
September 1, 2009
Study Completion
September 22, 2009
Last Updated
August 18, 2021
Results First Posted
June 18, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-08