Study Stopped
Terminated for futility by sponsor after a pre-planned interim review of data
A Phase II Study Evaluating SB-751689 in Post-Menopausal Women With Osteoporosis.
Study CR9108963: A 12-month, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo and Active-controlled Dose-range Finding Study of the Efficacy and Safety of SB-751689 in Post-menopausal Women With Osteoporosis
1 other identifier
interventional
564
14 countries
49
Brief Summary
This is a 12 month study designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of SB-751689 in the treatment of osteoporosis in post-menopausal women, in comparison with 2 active comparators and placebo.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started May 2007
49 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 7, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 9, 2007
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 14, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 26, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 26, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 5, 2017
CompletedNovember 7, 2017
September 1, 2017
1.6 years
May 7, 2007
August 2, 2017
October 9, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Marrow Density (BMD) at Month 12 Measured by Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Scans of the Lumbar Spine (L1-L4)
DXA scanners from Hologic and GE Lunar was used to measure BMD by a DXA scan. At least two vertebrae (L1-L4) that were suitable for measurement of BMD were evaluated. The same scanner was used throughout the study for all measurements for a given participant. DXA scans were sent to a central reading facility for quality control and central analysis. Assessments performed on Day 0 were considered as Baseline. Percent change from Baseline was computed as (change from baseline / baseline value) \* 100%. Percent change from Baseline in areal bone mineral density (aBMD) was reported.
Baseline (Day 0) and 12 Months
Number of Participants With Hypercalcemia
Participants with albumin-adjusted serum calcium pre-dose values of \>11.0 mg/ deciliter (dL) or post-dose values of \>12.0 mg/dL were recorded as participants with hypercalcemia. Number of participant with hypercalcemia were reported.
Up to Month 12
Number of Participants Withdrew Due to Hypercalcemia
A confirmed albumin-adjusted serum calcium pre-dose value of \>11.0 mg/dL or post-dose value of \>12.0 mg/dL was set as a withdrawal criteria for the study. Number of participants who met this pre-defined stopping criteria were reported.
Up to Month 12
Number of Participant With Laboratory Abnormalities of Potential Clinical Concern at Any Post-baseline Visit
The hematology parameters analyzed were white blood cells (WBC) count with differential WBC count, red blood cells, haemoglobin, haematocrit, mean corpuscular volume and platelet count. The clinical chemistry parameters analyzed were sodium, potassium, calcium, calcium (albumin adjusted), phosphate, bicarbonate, creatinine, bilirubin (total), alanine amino transferase, aspartate amino transferase, glucose, albumin, alkaline phosphatase, creatine phosphokinase, urea, uric acid, total protein, 25-OH vitamin D, 1,25-2(OH) vitamin D, whole parathyroid hormone (PTH 1-84)) and intact PTH (1-84 and 7-84). Only those parameters for which at least one value of potential clinical importance was reported are summarized. The number of participants with potential clinical important laboratory findings at any visit were reported.
Up to Month 12
Number of Participant With Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Any Post-baseline Visit
The potential clinical importance ranges (low and high) of the vital sign parameters-systolic blood pressure (\> 30 millimeter of mercury \[mmHg\] decrease from Baseline, \> 30 mmHg increase from Baseline), diastolic blood pressure (\> 20 mmHg decrease from Baseline and \> 20 mmHg increase from Baseline) and heart rate (\<45 and \>120 beats per minute). Only those parameters for which at least one value of potential clinical importance was reported are summarized. The number of participants with potential clinical important vital parameter findings at any visit were reported.
Up to 12 Months
Number of Participant With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings Reported as Adverse Event
Full 12-lead ECGs pre-dose at screening and visits 6, 8, 11, 12 and 14 were recorded. Participants rested supine or seated for at least 10 minutes before each reading. All ECGs were transmitted to a central reviewer for blinded assessment. The central reviewer measured the following parameters and provide a clinical interpretation: heart rate, RR interval, PR interval, QRS interval, QT (uncorrected) interval, QTcB (Bazett's correction) interval, QTcF (Fridericia's correction) interval. The central reviewer was provided the investigator or designated qualified site physician with a central ECG report or confirmatory report to assist them in identifying any clinically significant abnormalities that would preclude the participant from further participation in the study.
Up to 12 months
Mean Change From Baseline in Height
Assessments performed on Day 0 were considered as Baseline. Change from Baseline was computed as values at post baseline visit minus Baseline value. Mean change from baseline in height at Month 6 and 12 and early withdrawal were reported.
Baseline (Day 0), Month 6, 12 and early withdrawal
Mean Change From Baseline in Weight
Baseline values were assessed on Day 0. Change from Baseline was computed as values at post baseline visit minus Baseline value. Mean change from baseline in weight at Month 6, 12 and early withdrawal were reported.
Baseline (Day 0), Month 6, 12 and early withdrawal
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Percent Change From Baseline to Month 6 in BMD Measured by DXA Scans of the Lumbar Spine (L1-L4)
Baseline (Day 0) and Month 6
Percent Change From Baseline to Months 6 and 12 in BMD Measured by DXA Scans of the Hip (Total Hip, Femoral Neck and Trochanter).
Baseline (Day 0), Month 6 and Month 12
Number of Participants Who Remained the Same or Had Any Improvement in DXA BMD (> Baseline)
Baseline (Day 0), Month 5, 6 and 12
Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12 in the Volumetric Integral, Cortical, and Trabecular Density (BMD) at the Hip and Lumbar Spine as Measured by Quantitative Computer Tomography (QCT) Scans
Baseline (Day 0) and Month 12
Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12 in the Total Vertebra Integral VOI at the Lumbar Spine as Measured by QCT Scans
Baseline (Day 0) and Month 12
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Placebo
NO INTERVENTIONAll subjects will take calcium (500-660mg elemental daily) and vitamin D (at least 400IU daily) supplements once daily in the evening throughout the study
Alendronate
ACTIVE COMPARATORAll subjects will take calcium (500-660mg elemental daily) and vitamin D (at least 400IU daily) supplements once daily in the evening throughout the study
Teriparatide
ACTIVE COMPARATOROpen-label arm. All subjects will take calcium (500-660mg elemental daily) and vitamin D (at least 400IU daily) supplements once daily in the evening throughout the study
Ronacaleret
EXPERIMENTAL4 arms, 100mg, 200mg, 300mg, 400mg. All subjects will take calcium (500-660mg elemental daily) and vitamin D (at least 400IU daily) supplements once daily in the evening throughout the study.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Informed consent: Subject is willing and able to provide written informed consent.
- Menopausal status: Ambulatory female aged \< 80 years at screening and \>5 years postmenopausal.
- If no prevalent vertebral fracture subject must have an absolute BMD value consistent with a T-score of less than or equal to -2.5 and greater than -4.0 at either the femoral neck, total hip, trochanter, or lumbar spine, or If one prevalent vertebral fracture subject must have an absolute BMD value consistent with a T-score of less than or equal to -2.0 and greater than -4.0 at either the femoral neck, total hip, trochanter, or lumbar spine.
- Suitable vertebra: Two or more vertebra in the range of L1 to L4 that are suitable for BMD measurement by DXA.
- Protocol compliance: Subject who, in the opinion of the investigator, is willing and able to comply with the requirements of the protocol.
You may not qualify if:
- T-Score: Has an absolute BMD value consistent with a T-score less than or equal to -4.0 at either the femoral neck, total hip, trochanter, or lumbar spine.
- Vertebral fractures: Has \>1 prevalent vertebral fracture at the screening visit.
- Non-vertebral fractures: Any previous non-vertebral osteoporosis related/fragility fracture after age 40.
- Spine deformity: Significant spine deformity which would preclude DXA/QCT assessments.
- BMI: BMI ≥33kg/m2.
- Bone metabolic diseases: Other than osteoporosis, history or concurrent diseases affecting bone metabolism (e.g., osteomalacia, hyperparathyroidism, hyperthyroidism).
- GI disease: History of major upper gastrointestinal disease
- Malabsorption: Active or history of malabsorption (e.g., history of celiac disease, irritable bowel syndrome or inflammatory bowel disease).
- Liver disease: Past or current history of liver disease or known hepatic or biliary abnormalities, (with the exception of previously documented diagnosis of Gilbert's syndrome).
- Rheumatoid arthritis: Active disease or history of rheumatoid arthritis.
- Nephrolithiasis: History of or active nephrolithiasis (kidney stones).
- Osteosarcoma risk: Subjects at increased risk of osteosarcoma such as those with Paget's disease of bone or any prior external beam or implant radiation therapy involving the skeleton.
- Malignancy: Malignant disease diagnosed within the previous 5 years (except resected basal cell cancer).
- Biological abnormalities: Any clinically relevant biological abnormality found and/or volunteered at screening (other than those related to the disease under investigation) which, in the opinion of the investigator, is clinically significant and would preclude safe participation in this study.
- Surgical and medical conditions: Presence of the following conditions within six months prior to screening: myocardial infarction, coronary bypass surgery, coronary artery angioplasty, unstable angina, cardiac arrhythmia, clinically evident congestive heart failure, or cerebrovascular accident.
- +37 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- GlaxoSmithKlinelead
Study Sites (49)
GSK Investigational Site
Oakland, California, 94609, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Palm Desert, California, 92260, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Walnut Creek, California, 94598, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Decatur, Georgia, 30033, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Bethesda, Maryland, 20817, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Akron, Ohio, 44313, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Portland, Oregon, 97213, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1117ABH, Argentina
GSK Investigational Site
Buenos Aires, 1012, Argentina
GSK Investigational Site
Buenos Aires, C1128AAF, Argentina
GSK Investigational Site
St Leonards, New South Wales, 2065, Australia
GSK Investigational Site
Footscray, Victoria, 3011, Australia
GSK Investigational Site
Geelong, Victoria, 3220, Australia
GSK Investigational Site
Heidelberg, Victoria, 3081, Australia
GSK Investigational Site
Ghent, 9000, Belgium
GSK Investigational Site
Liège, 4020, Belgium
GSK Investigational Site
Tienen, 3300, Belgium
GSK Investigational Site
Ballerup Municipality, 2750, Denmark
GSK Investigational Site
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, 60528, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Berlin, 10559, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Berlin, 12203, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Berlin, 12247, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Berlin, 13125, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Hamburg, 22143, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Hamburg, 22415, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
GSK Investigational Site
Shatin, Hong Kong
GSK Investigational Site
Mexico City, 14050, Mexico
GSK Investigational Site
Bergen, 5094, Norway
GSK Investigational Site
Hamar, 2317, Norway
GSK Investigational Site
Oslo, 0176, Norway
GSK Investigational Site
Grudziądz, 86-300, Poland
GSK Investigational Site
Warsaw, 02-341, Poland
GSK Investigational Site
Wroclaw, 50-088, Poland
GSK Investigational Site
Moscow, 117292, Russia
GSK Investigational Site
Moscow, 127299, Russia
GSK Investigational Site
Panorama, 7500, South Africa
GSK Investigational Site
Rosebank, 2196, South Africa
GSK Investigational Site
Somerset West, 7130, South Africa
GSK Investigational Site
Seoul, 120-752, South Korea
GSK Investigational Site
Suwon, 443-721, South Korea
GSK Investigational Site
Barcelona, 08003, Spain
GSK Investigational Site
Barcelona, 08022, Spain
GSK Investigational Site
Madrid, 28007, Spain
GSK Investigational Site
Madrid, 28046, Spain
GSK Investigational Site
Santiago de Compostela, 15705, Spain
GSK Investigational Site
Santiago de Compostela, 15706, Spain
Related Publications (2)
Fitzpatrick LA, Dabrowski CE, Cicconetti G, Gordon DN, Fuerst T, Engelke K, Genant HK. Ronacaleret, a calcium-sensing receptor antagonist, increases trabecular but not cortical bone in postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res. 2012 Feb;27(2):255-62. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.554.
PMID: 22052452BACKGROUNDFitzpatrick LA, Dabrowski CE, Cicconetti G, Gordon DN, Papapoulos S, Bone HG 3rd, Bilezikian JP. The effects of ronacaleret, a calcium-sensing receptor antagonist, on bone mineral density and biochemical markers of bone turnover in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Aug;96(8):2441-9. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-2855. Epub 2011 May 18.
PMID: 21593114DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The study was terminated for futility in a phased manner by the sponsor on 25-Sep-2008 once the results of a planned 6-month interim analysis were available.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- GSK Response Center
- Organization
- GlaxoSmithKline
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
GSK Clinical Trials
GlaxoSmithKline
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 7, 2007
First Posted
May 9, 2007
Study Start
May 14, 2007
Primary Completion
December 26, 2008
Study Completion
December 26, 2008
Last Updated
November 7, 2017
Results First Posted
September 5, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.