Study Stopped
Poor recruitment
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Bipolar Depression
A Comparison of Left vs. Right Prefrontal Cortex Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation as a Treatment for Bipolar Depression
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This is a study to assess the effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) as a treatment for depressed adults with bipolar disorder. In rTMS high-intensity, fluctuating magnetic fields non-invasively stimulate the cortex of the brain depolarising neurons. No anaesthetic is required and the treatment in subconvulsive. Recent studies suggest that rTMS can be an effective treatment for depressive illness in adults (Loo and Mitchell et al, 2005) and appears to be quite safe. Most of the published studies to date have focused on unipolar depression. There is limited data of TMS use in bipolar depression. Eg. Pilot study by Nahas Z, Kozel FA, Li X, Anderson B, George MS.in 2003, which was negative. The investigators wish to assess this in a sham-controlled study of adults. The investigators hypothesise that both left and right sided rTMS will have an antidepressant effect superior to sham in this population.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Apr 2007
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 7, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 8, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2008
CompletedApril 3, 2023
March 1, 2023
1.7 years
May 7, 2007
March 29, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
All measures at baseline and at the end of each week of treatment in the blind phase and after every 2 weeks of treatment in the open phase.
weekly
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
Weekly
Clinical Global Impressions Scale (CGI)
Weekly
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Patient Global Improvement scale
Weekly
Young Mania Rating Scale
weekly
Study Arms (2)
TMS
EXPERIMENTALSham
SHAM COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- DSM-IV Major Depressive Episode of no more than 3 years.
- Diagnosis of bipolar I or II disorder
- Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale score of 20 or more.
- Aged over 18
- May or may not be taking antidepressant medication.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient not able to give informed consent.
- Failure to respond to ECT in current episode of depression.
- Significant other Axis I psychiatric disorders e.g. schizophrenia.
- In imminent physical or psychological danger, or needs rapid clinical response due to inanition, psychosis or high suicide risk.
- Comorbid substance abuse or dependence
- History of neurological illness e.g. epilepsy; neurosurgical procedure
- Metal in the cranium, a pacemaker, cochlear implant, medication pump or other electronic device.
- Women of child-bearing age in whom pregnancy cannot be ruled out.
- Patients with a history of mood 'switching' in response to other treatments.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Black Dog Research Institute
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Northside Clinic
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Related Publications (2)
Nahas Z, Kozel FA, Li X, Anderson B, George MS. Left prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) treatment of depression in bipolar affective disorder: a pilot study of acute safety and efficacy. Bipolar Disord. 2003 Feb;5(1):40-7. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-5618.2003.00011.x.
PMID: 12656937BACKGROUNDLoo CK, Mitchell PB. A review of the efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) treatment for depression, and current and future strategies to optimize efficacy. J Affect Disord. 2005 Nov;88(3):255-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2005.08.001. Epub 2005 Sep 2.
PMID: 16139895BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Colleen Loo, FRANZCP, MD
University of New South Wales
- STUDY DIRECTOR
William Lyndon, FRANZCP
University of Sydney
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 7, 2007
First Posted
May 8, 2007
Study Start
April 1, 2007
Primary Completion
December 1, 2008
Study Completion
December 1, 2008
Last Updated
April 3, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-03