NCT00455520

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness (level of pain control) and safety of Tapentadol (CG5503) extended release (ER) (base) compared to placebo in patients with moderate to severe pain from diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
395

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2007

Shorter than P25 for phase_3

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 1, 2007

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2007

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 3, 2007

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2008

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2008

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

January 13, 2010

Completed
Last Updated

July 19, 2013

Status Verified

July 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

April 1, 2007

Results QC Date

August 19, 2009

Last Update Submit

July 12, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

Diabetic neuropathyPainful Diabetic PolyneuropathyPolyneuropathyPeripheral neuropathy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change From Baseline (at Randomization) in Average Pain Intensity on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Over the Last Week of the Double-blind Maintenance Period at Week 12

    For this twice daily pain assessment, the subjects were to indicate the level of pain experienced over the previous 12 hours on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) where a score of 0 indicated "no pain" and a score of 10 indicated "pain as bad as you can imagine".

    Baseline and 12 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • The Number of Patients Achieving at Least 30% Improvement in Pain Score at Week 12 of the Double-blind Maintenance Period From the Start of the Open Label Period.

    Start of Open Label and at 12 weeks of Double Blind

  • Percentage of Patients Who Reported Very Much Improved or Much Improved From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12

    12 week endpoint

  • Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 (EQ-5D) Health Status Index to Week 12

    12 week endpoint (change from baseline)

  • Change From Baseline in Sleep Latency Time in Hours Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12.

    Baseline and 12 week endpoint

  • Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Total Pain Score Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12.

    Baseline and12 week endpoint

Study Arms (2)

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

placebo matching placebo twice daily for 12 weeks

Drug: placebo

CG5503

EXPERIMENTAL

CG5503 100, 150, 200, 250mg twice daily given for up to 15 weeks

Drug: CG5503

Interventions

CG5503DRUG

100, 150, 200, 250 mg twice daily given for up to 15 weeks

CG5503

matching placebo twice daily for 12 weeks

Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitus must have a documented clinical diagnosis of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy with symptoms and signs for at least 6 months, and pain present at the time of screening
  • The investigator considers the patient's blood glucose to be controlled by diet, or hypoglycemics, or insulin for at least 3 months prior to enrolling in the study (this control should be documented by figures of glycated hemoglobin \[HbA1c\] no greater than 11% at screening)
  • Patients have been taking analgesic medications for the condition for at least 3 months prior to screening (patients taking opioid analgesics must be dissatisfied with current treatment, and patients taking non-opioid analgesics must be dissatisfied with current analgesia)
  • Patients currently requiring opioid treatment must be taking daily doses of an opioid-based analgesic equivalent to \<=160 mg of oral morphine

You may not qualify if:

  • No significant pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, metabolic (except diabetes mellitus), neurological, psychiatric disorders (resulting in disorientation, memory impairment or inability to report accurately as in schizophrenia, Alzheimer's disease), or any other clinically significant disease that in the Investigator's opinion may affect efficacy or safety assessments or may compromise patient's safety during trial participation
  • no history of moderate to severe hepatic impairment such as chronic hepatitis B or C, presence of active hepatitis B or C within the last 3 months or impaired hepatic function with ALT or AST greater than 3-fold ULN
  • No patients with severely impaired renal function
  • No laboratory values above or below limits of normal unless considered not clinically relevant by the Investigator
  • No significant cardiac disease (e.g., unstable angina pectoris, angina pectoris Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class III-IV, acute myocardial infarction within the last 3 months, cardiac insufficiency New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III-IV) or significant vascular disease (e.g., peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) Fontaine class IIb-IV)
  • no life-long history of seizure disorders or epilepsy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (2)

  • Afilalo M, Morlion B. Efficacy of tapentadol ER for managing moderate to severe chronic pain. Pain Physician. 2013 Jan;16(1):27-40.

  • Schwartz S, Etropolski M, Shapiro DY, Okamoto A, Lange R, Haeussler J, Rauschkolb C. Safety and efficacy of tapentadol ER in patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: results of a randomized-withdrawal, placebo-controlled trial. Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Jan;27(1):151-62. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2010.537589.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetic NeuropathiesPolyneuropathiesPeripheral Nervous System Diseases

Interventions

Tapentadol

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neuromuscular DiseasesNervous System DiseasesDiabetes ComplicationsDiabetes MellitusEndocrine System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PhenolsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsOrganic Chemicals

Results Point of Contact

Title
Senior Director, Clinical Leader
Organization
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development

Study Officials

  • Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L. C. Clinical Trial

    Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 1, 2007

First Posted

April 3, 2007

Study Start

April 1, 2007

Primary Completion

August 1, 2008

Study Completion

August 1, 2008

Last Updated

July 19, 2013

Results First Posted

January 13, 2010

Record last verified: 2013-07