A Safety and Efficacy Study for Tapentadol (CG5503) Extended Release for Patients With Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
A Randomized-Withdrawal Phase 3 Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of CG5503 Extended Release (ER) in Subjects With Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
2 other identifiers
interventional
395
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness (level of pain control) and safety of Tapentadol (CG5503) extended release (ER) (base) compared to placebo in patients with moderate to severe pain from diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Apr 2007
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 1, 2007
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 3, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 13, 2010
CompletedJuly 19, 2013
July 1, 2013
1.3 years
April 1, 2007
August 19, 2009
July 12, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline (at Randomization) in Average Pain Intensity on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Over the Last Week of the Double-blind Maintenance Period at Week 12
For this twice daily pain assessment, the subjects were to indicate the level of pain experienced over the previous 12 hours on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) where a score of 0 indicated "no pain" and a score of 10 indicated "pain as bad as you can imagine".
Baseline and 12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (5)
The Number of Patients Achieving at Least 30% Improvement in Pain Score at Week 12 of the Double-blind Maintenance Period From the Start of the Open Label Period.
Start of Open Label and at 12 weeks of Double Blind
Percentage of Patients Who Reported Very Much Improved or Much Improved From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12
12 week endpoint
Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 (EQ-5D) Health Status Index to Week 12
12 week endpoint (change from baseline)
Change From Baseline in Sleep Latency Time in Hours Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12.
Baseline and 12 week endpoint
Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Total Pain Score Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12.
Baseline and12 week endpoint
Study Arms (2)
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORplacebo matching placebo twice daily for 12 weeks
CG5503
EXPERIMENTALCG5503 100, 150, 200, 250mg twice daily given for up to 15 weeks
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitus must have a documented clinical diagnosis of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy with symptoms and signs for at least 6 months, and pain present at the time of screening
- The investigator considers the patient's blood glucose to be controlled by diet, or hypoglycemics, or insulin for at least 3 months prior to enrolling in the study (this control should be documented by figures of glycated hemoglobin \[HbA1c\] no greater than 11% at screening)
- Patients have been taking analgesic medications for the condition for at least 3 months prior to screening (patients taking opioid analgesics must be dissatisfied with current treatment, and patients taking non-opioid analgesics must be dissatisfied with current analgesia)
- Patients currently requiring opioid treatment must be taking daily doses of an opioid-based analgesic equivalent to \<=160 mg of oral morphine
You may not qualify if:
- No significant pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, metabolic (except diabetes mellitus), neurological, psychiatric disorders (resulting in disorientation, memory impairment or inability to report accurately as in schizophrenia, Alzheimer's disease), or any other clinically significant disease that in the Investigator's opinion may affect efficacy or safety assessments or may compromise patient's safety during trial participation
- no history of moderate to severe hepatic impairment such as chronic hepatitis B or C, presence of active hepatitis B or C within the last 3 months or impaired hepatic function with ALT or AST greater than 3-fold ULN
- No patients with severely impaired renal function
- No laboratory values above or below limits of normal unless considered not clinically relevant by the Investigator
- No significant cardiac disease (e.g., unstable angina pectoris, angina pectoris Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class III-IV, acute myocardial infarction within the last 3 months, cardiac insufficiency New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III-IV) or significant vascular disease (e.g., peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) Fontaine class IIb-IV)
- no life-long history of seizure disorders or epilepsy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (2)
Afilalo M, Morlion B. Efficacy of tapentadol ER for managing moderate to severe chronic pain. Pain Physician. 2013 Jan;16(1):27-40.
PMID: 23340531DERIVEDSchwartz S, Etropolski M, Shapiro DY, Okamoto A, Lange R, Haeussler J, Rauschkolb C. Safety and efficacy of tapentadol ER in patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: results of a randomized-withdrawal, placebo-controlled trial. Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Jan;27(1):151-62. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2010.537589.
PMID: 21162697DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Senior Director, Clinical Leader
- Organization
- Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L. C. Clinical Trial
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 1, 2007
First Posted
April 3, 2007
Study Start
April 1, 2007
Primary Completion
August 1, 2008
Study Completion
August 1, 2008
Last Updated
July 19, 2013
Results First Posted
January 13, 2010
Record last verified: 2013-07