Tapentadol (CG5503)
A Randomized Double-Blind, Placebo- and Active-Control, Parallel-arm, Phase III Trial With Controlled Adjustment of Dose to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of CG5503 Extended-Release (ER) in Patients With Moderate to Severe Chronic Pain Due to Osteoarthritis of the Knee
3 other identifiers
interventional
1,030
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this trial is to evaluate the effectiveness (level of pain control) and safety of orally administered tapentadol (CG5503) Extended Release (ER) (base) at doses of 100-250 mg twice daily in patients with moderate to severe chronic pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee, in comparison with placebo and Oxycodone Controlled Release (CR).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Jan 2007
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 12, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 15, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 23, 2010
CompletedApril 18, 2012
April 1, 2012
1.5 years
January 12, 2007
July 8, 2009
April 16, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline of the Average Pain Intensity Based on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale(NRS) Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12.
For this twice daily pain assessment, the subjects were to indicate the level of pain experienced over the previous 12 hours on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) where a score of 0 indicated "no pain" and a score of 10 indicated "pain as bad as you can imagine".
Baseline and 12 weeks (Primary endpoint is the average pain intensity score during the last week of the maintenance period).
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario McMaster Questionnaire (WOMAC) Assessing Pain, Disability and Joint Stiffness of the Knee Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12
Baseline and 12 week endpoint
Change From Baseline in Sleep Latency Time in Hours Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12.
Baseline and 12 week endpoint
Percentage of Patients Who Reported Very Much Improved or Much Improved From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12
Baseline and 12 week endpoint
Distribution of Time to Treatment Discontinuation Due to Lack of Efficacy
Baseline to 12 weeks
Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 (EQ-5D) Health Status Index to Week 12
Baseline and 12 week endpoint
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
001
EXPERIMENTALtapentadol (CG5503) 50 100 150 200 250mg twice a day (BID) during 15 weeks
002
ACTIVE COMPARATORoxycodone 10 20 30 40 50mg twice a day (BID) during 15 weeks
003
PLACEBO COMPARATORplacebo matching placebo twice a day (BID) during 15 weeks
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients diagnosed with osteoarthritis of the knee based on the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria and functional capacity class of I-III
- patients taking analgesic medications for at least 3 months prior to screening and/or dissatisfied with their current therapy
- Patients requiring opioid treatment must be taking daily doses of opioid-based analgesic, equivalent to \<160 mg of oral morphine
- baseline score of greater than or equal to 5 on an 11-point numerical rating scale, calculated as the average pain intensity during the last 3 days prior to randomization.
You may not qualify if:
- History of alcohol and/or drug abuse in Investigator's judgement
- history of significant liver insufficiency
- chronic hepatitis B or C, or HIV, presence of active hepatitis B or C within the past 3 months
- life-long history of seizure disorder or epilepsy
- history of malignancy within past 2 years, with exception of basal cell carcinoma that has been successfully treated
- uncontrolled hypertension
- patients with severely impaired renal function
- patients with moderate to severly impaired hepatic function or with laboratory values reflecting inadequate hepatic function
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (5)
Etropolski M, Kuperwasser B, Flugel M, Haufel T, Lange B, Rauschkolb C, Laschewski F. Safety and tolerability of tapentadol extended release in moderate to severe chronic osteoarthritis or low back pain management: pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials. Adv Ther. 2014 Jun;31(6):604-20. doi: 10.1007/s12325-014-0128-6. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
PMID: 24985410DERIVEDBiondi DM, Xiang J, Etropolski M, Moskovitz B. Evaluation of blood pressure and heart rate in patients with hypertension who received tapentadol extended release for chronic pain: a post hoc, pooled data analysis. Clin Drug Investig. 2014 Aug;34(8):565-76. doi: 10.1007/s40261-014-0209-y.
PMID: 24916058DERIVEDEtropolski M, Lange B, Goldberg J, Steup A, Rauschkolb C. A pooled analysis of patient-specific factors and efficacy and tolerability of tapentadol extended release treatment for moderate to severe chronic pain. J Opioid Manag. 2013 Sep-Oct;9(5):343-56. doi: 10.5055/jom.2013.0177.
PMID: 24353047DERIVEDMerchant S, Provenzano D, Mody S, Ho KF, Etropolski M. Composite measure to assess efficacy/gastrointestinal tolerability of tapentadol ER versus oxycodone CR for chronic pain: pooled analysis of randomized studies. J Opioid Manag. 2013 Jan-Feb;9(1):51-61. doi: 10.5055/jom.2013.0147.
PMID: 23709304DERIVEDAfilalo M, Morlion B. Efficacy of tapentadol ER for managing moderate to severe chronic pain. Pain Physician. 2013 Jan;16(1):27-40.
PMID: 23340531DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Senior Director, Clinical Leader
- Organization
- Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L. C. Clinical Trial
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 12, 2007
First Posted
January 15, 2007
Study Start
January 1, 2007
Primary Completion
July 1, 2008
Study Completion
December 1, 2008
Last Updated
April 18, 2012
Results First Posted
April 23, 2010
Record last verified: 2012-04