A Study of Sativex® for Pain Relief Due to Diabetic Neuropathy
A Double Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group Study of Sativex in the Treatment of Subjects With Pain Due to Diabetic Neuropathy
1 other identifier
interventional
297
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of Sativex® compared with placebo in relieving pain due to Diabetic Neuropathy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3 pain
Started Jul 2005
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2006
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 2, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 4, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 31, 2012
CompletedMay 3, 2023
April 1, 2023
11 months
July 2, 2008
June 26, 2012
April 7, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
The Change From Baseline in Mean Diabetic Neuropathy Pain 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale Score at the End of Treatment (Average of Last 7 Days Treatment)
The diabetic neuropathy pain Numerical Rating Scale was complete at the end of every day. The patient was asked "on a scale of '0 to 10', please indicate the number that best describes your nerve pain due to diabetes in the last 24 hours" where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain. No pain relates to the time prior to the onset of pain due to diabetic neuropathy. For those whose evaluable period ended before Day 7, the mean of the available post-randomisation data was used. Those with no post-baseline diary pain 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale scores were excluded from the analysis.
Day 0 to Day 98
Number of Responders at the 30% Improvement Level at the End of Treatment
A positive 30% pain response is defined as a reduction of at least 30% in the mean NRS average pain score from baseline to week 14 (last 7 days). The patient was asked "on a scale of '0 to 10', please indicate the number that best describes your pain or average pain in the last 24 hours" where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. No pain relates to the time prior to the onset of pain. The average pain NRS was completed at the same time each day, i.e. bedtime in the evening. Estimates were produced for a one-week period, with the evaluable period finishing at the end of the appropriate seven-day period.
Day 0 - Day 98
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Change From Baseline in Mean Neuropathic Pain Scale Score at the End of Treatment
Day 0 to Day 98
Change From Baseline in Mean Sleep Quality 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale Score at the End of Treatment
Day 0 - Day 98
Subject Global Impression of Change at the End of Treatment
Day 0 and Day 98
Change From Baseline in Mean Brief Pain Inventory (Short Form)'Pain Severity Composite Score' at the End of Treatment
Day 0 and Day 98
Change From Baseline in Mean Quality of Life EuroQol 5-D Weighted Health State Index Score at the End of Treatment Measured by Visual Analogue Scale
Day 0 and Day 98
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Sativex
EXPERIMENTALPlacebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
containing THC (27 mg/ml):CBD (25 mg/ml), in ethanol:propylene glycol (50:50) excipients, with peppermint oil (0.05%) flavouring. Maximum permitted dose was eight actuations in any three hour period and 24 actuations (THC 65 mg: CBD 60 mg) in 24 hours
containing peppermint oil, 0.05% (v/v), quinoline yellow, 0.005% (w/v), sunset yellow, 0.0025% (w/v), in ethanol:propylene glycol (50:50) excipient.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Willing and able to give informed consent.
- Male or female, aged 18 years or above.
- Ability (in the investigators opinion) and willingness to comply with all study requirements.
- Diagnosed with Type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus as diagnosed according to the World Health Organisation (WHO) criteria.
- Diagnosed with neuropathic pain due to distal symmetrical diabetic neuropathy of at least six months duration, as defined by a NDS score of at least 4, and in who pain is not wholly relieved with their current therapy. The NDS score must be attained from at least two different test parameters and not only the ankle jerk reflex.
- The last six daily diary 0-10 NRS pain scores before randomisation summed to at least 24.
- Stable dose of regular pain medication and non-pharmacological therapies (including TENS) for at least 14 days prior to the screening visit and willingness for these to be maintained throughout the study.
- Agreement for the responsible authorities (as applicable in individual countries), their primary care physician, and their consultant, if appropriate, to be notified of their participation in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Concomitant pain thought by the investigator to be of a nature or severity to interfere with their assessment of their painful diabetic neuropathy.
- Uncontrolled diabetes with HbA1c blood levels of more than 11% at Visit1, Day B1.
- Receiving a prohibited medication and were unwilling to stop or comply for the duration of the study.
- Has used cannabinoid based medications within 60 days of study entry and were unwilling to abstain for the duration for the study.
- Has used cannabis within 30 days of study entry and were unwilling to abstain for the duration for the study.
- History of schizophrenia, other psychotic illness, severe personality disorder or other significant psychiatric disorder other than depression associated with their underlying condition.
- Known or suspected history of alcohol or substance abuse.
- History of epilepsy or recurrent seizures.
- Known or suspected hypersensitivity to cannabinoids or any of the excipients of the IMP.
- Postural drop of 20mmHg or more in systolic blood pressure at screening.
- Medical history of gastroparesis.
- Evidence of cardiomyopathy.
- Experienced myocardial infarction or clinically relevant cardiac dysfunction within the last 12 months or had a cardiac disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator would put the subject at risk of a clinically relevant arrhythmia or myocardial infarction.
- QT interval; of \> 450 ms (males) or \> 470 ms (females) at Visit 1.
- Secondary or tertiary AV block or sinus bradycardia (HR \<50bpm) or sinus tachycardia (HR\>110bpm) at Visit 1.
- +11 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Royal Hallamshire Hospital
Sheffield, Yorkshire, S10 2JF, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Mr Richard Potts, Clinical Operations Director
- Organization
- GW Pharm Ltd
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Solomon Tesfaye, JCHMT FRCP
Royal Hallamshire Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 2, 2008
First Posted
July 4, 2008
Study Start
July 1, 2005
Primary Completion
June 1, 2006
Study Completion
June 1, 2006
Last Updated
May 3, 2023
Results First Posted
July 31, 2012
Record last verified: 2023-04