NCT00452972|Completed
Exteriorized Versus In Situ Uterine Repair at Cesarean Delivery
Complications of Exteriorized Versus In Situ Uterine Repair at Cesarean Delivery Under Spinal Anesthesia
Loading search results
Complications of Exteriorized Versus In Situ Uterine Repair at Cesarean Delivery Under Spinal Anesthesia
Sponsor study identifier
Secondary identifiers
interventional
80
1 country
1
Study Start
April 2004
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Primary Completion
Not reported
Date not reportedStudy Completion
December 2004
Actual (reported)This study was undertaken to compare the two techniques (exteriorized vs in situ) of uterine repair with respect to patient comfort, hemodynamic changes, surgical time and blood loss, in patients undergoing elective CD under a strictly standardized spinal anesthetic. We hypothesized that in situ uterine repair would be more comfortable for the patients.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
December 2004
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
April 2004
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
December 2004
Actual (reported)March 19, 2007
Actual (reported)March 28, 2007
Actual (reported)Intraoperative nausea or vomiting after deliver of the infant
Intraoperative pain
Calculated blood loss
Uterine contractility
Hypotension
Heart rate changes
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Mount Sinai Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X5, Canada
Siddiqui M, Goldszmidt E, Fallah S, Kingdom J, Windrim R, Carvalho JC. Complications of exteriorized compared with in situ uterine repair at cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Sep;110(3):570-5. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000277712.67230.22.
Jose CA Carvalho, MD PhD
MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL
First Submitted
March 19, 2007
First Posted
March 28, 2007
Study Start
April 2004
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Study Completion
December 2004
Actual (reported)Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Last Updated
March 28, 2007
Record last verified: 2007-03
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: