Finasteride in Treating Patients With Stage II Prostate Cancer Who Are Undergoing Surgery
A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Tissue Effects of Preoperative Finasteride Versus Placebo for Patients With Clinically Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer
6 other identifiers
interventional
204
1 country
8
Brief Summary
This randomized phase II trial studies how well finasteride works in treating patients with stage II prostate cancer who are undergoing surgery. Testosterone can cause the growth of prostate cancer cells. Hormone therapy using finasteride may fight prostate cancer by lowering the amount of testosterone the body makes. Giving finasteride before surgery may make the tumor smaller and reduce the amount of normal tissue that needs to be removed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Feb 2007
Longer than P75 for phase_2
8 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 20, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 22, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 9, 2016
CompletedMarch 9, 2016
June 1, 2015
5.2 years
February 20, 2007
October 20, 2015
February 10, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Comparison of Biomarkers Between Treatment Arms: Percentage Change of Tumor Cells Exhibiting Detectable Staining Within Gleason Grade 3 (GG3) Biomarker Subgroups at Prostatectomy
Molecular marker expression based on tissue microarray (TMA) derived from dominant tumor focus. Staining microarrays for high-throughput assessment of candidate gene expression and data modeling constructed with a tissue microarray apparatus and 0.6-mm biopsy cores, representative of tumor grades and scores (Gleason Grades 3 (GG3) and Gleason Grade 4 (GG4)). The percentage of tumor cells exhibiting detectable staining, scored as 0 to 10 where higher score designates more involvement, as applicable for: vascular epithelial growth factor (VEFG), estrogen receptor beta (ERβ), androgen receptor (AR), 3-oxo-5α-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 2 (SRD5A2), ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2C (UBE2C), and Cleaved Caspase 3 (Caspase). P values are based on non-parametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test.
At prostatectomy following maximum 6 week treatment period
Comparison of Biomarkers Between Treatment Arms: Percentage Change of Tumor Cells Exhibiting Detectable Staining Within Gleason Grade 4 (GG4) Biomarker Subgroup at Prostatectomy
Biomarkers using pretreatment and posttreatment values. Staining microarrays for high-throughput assessment of candidate gene expression and data modeling constructed with a tissue microarray apparatus and 0.6-mm biopsy cores, representative of tumor grades and scores (Gleason Grades 3 (GG3) and Gleason Grade 4 (GG4)). The percentage of tumor cells exhibiting detectable staining, scored as 0 to 10 where higher score designates more involvement, as applicable for: VEGF denotes vascular epithelial growth factor, ERβ estrogen receptor beta, AR androgen receptor, SRD5A2, 3-oxo-5α-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 2, UBE2C, ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2C. P values are based on non-parametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test.
At prostatectomy following maximum 6 week treatment period
Comparison of Biomarkers Between Treatment Arms: Percentage Change of Tumor Cells Exhibiting Detectable Staining Within Gleason Grade 3 (GG3) Biomarker Subgroups at Prostatectomy
Molecular marker expression compared between tumor foci using Biomarkers pretreatment and posttreatment values. Staining microarrays for high-throughput assessment of candidate gene expression and data modeling constructed with a tissue microarray apparatus and 0.6-mm biopsy cores, representative of tumor grades and scores (Gleason Grades 3 (GG3) and Gleason Grade 4 (GG4)). The percentage of tumor cells exhibiting detectable staining, scored as 0 to 10 where higher score designates more involvement, as applicable for: VEGF denotes vascular epithelial growth factor, ERβ estrogen receptor beta, AR androgen receptor, SRD5A2, 3-oxo-5α-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 2, UBE2C, ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2C.
At prostatectomy following maximum 6 week treatment period.
Comparison of Biomarkers Between Treatment Arms: Percentage Change of Tumor Cells Exhibiting Detectable Staining Within Gleason Grade 4 (GG4) Biomarker Subgroup at Prostatectomy
Molecular marker expression compared between tumor foci using biomarkers pretreatment and posttreatment values. Staining microarrays for high-throughput assessment of candidate gene expression and data modeling constructed with a tissue microarray apparatus and 0.6-mm biopsy cores, representative of tumor grades and scores (Gleason Grades 3 (GG3) and Gleason Grade 4 (GG4)). The percentage of tumor cells exhibiting detectable staining, scored as 0 to 10 where higher score designates more involvement, as applicable for: VEGF denotes vascular epithelial growth factor, ERβ estrogen receptor beta, AR androgen receptor, SRD5A2, 3-oxo-5α-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 2, UBE2C, ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2C.
At prostatectomy following maximum 6 week treatment period.
Secondary Outcomes (20)
Pathologic Characteristics of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens After Treatment: Gleason Score
Assessment following maximum 6 week treatment period and prostatectomy
Pathologic Characteristics of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens After Treatment: Gleason Grade -- Specimen (Primary)
Assessment following maximum 6 week treatment period and prostatectomy
Pathologic Characteristics of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens After Treatment: Gleason Grade -- Specimen (Secondary)
Assessment following maximum 6 week treatment period and prostatectomy
Pathologic Characteristics of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens After Treatment: Tumor, Node, Metastasis (TNM) Stage
Assessment following maximum 6 week treatment period and prostatectomy
Pathologic Characteristics of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens After Treatment: Margin of Resection (MOR)
Assessment following maximum 6 week treatment period and prostatectomy
- +15 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Arm I (Finasteride)
EXPERIMENTALFinasteride 5 mg once daily for 4-6 weeks, then undergo prostatectomy.
Arm II (Placebo)
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo once daily for 4-6 weeks, then undergo prostatectomy.
Interventions
Undergo prostatectomy
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)lead
- M.D. Anderson Cancer Centercollaborator
Study Sites (8)
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75390, United States
M D Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Audie L Murphy Veterans Affairs Hospital
San Antonio, Texas, 78209, United States
Cancer Therapy and Research Center
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
University Hospital
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Predefined molecular signature could not easily distinguish GG 4 from GG 3 tumor areas in the placebo arm.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Jeri Kim, MD / Associate Professor, Genitourinary Medical Oncology
- Organization
- University of Texas (UT) MD Anderson Cancer Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jeri Kim
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- NIH
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 20, 2007
First Posted
February 22, 2007
Study Start
February 1, 2007
Primary Completion
April 1, 2012
Study Completion
April 1, 2012
Last Updated
March 9, 2016
Results First Posted
March 9, 2016
Record last verified: 2015-06