Intermittent Preventive Treatment (IPTp) Versus Rapid Diagnostic Testing (RDT) and Treatment of Malaria in Pregnancy
The Effectiveness, Cost and Cost Effectiveness of Intermittent Preventive Treatment or Screening and Treatment of Malaria in Pregnancy Among Women Using Long Lasting Insecticide Treated Bed Net: a Randomised Controlled Trial.
2 other identifiers
interventional
3,333
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Among the best practices recommended for malaria control during pregnancy is ensuring effective case management of malaria illness. However, this is often not practiced because (1) malaria infection in pregnancy is often asymptomatic, (2) peripheral parasitaemia may be absent even when the placenta is heavily parasitized, (3) implementing diagnosis and treatment of malaria within a routine antenatal service may be difficult and (4) antimalarial treatment options available to pregnant women are limited due to resistance to chloroquine(CQ) and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine(SP0 and paucity of safety and efficacy data on other antimalarial drugs in pregnancy, particularly artemisinin combination treatments (ACT). Therefore the commonest recommended practice in pregnancy is the administration of SP as intermittent preventive treatment (SP-IPTp). However, the effectiveness of SP-IPTp has been questioned because parasite resistance to SP is spreading rapidly across sub-Saharan Africa. This is a three-arm open label randomised control non-inferiority trial of insecticide-treated nets(ITN) plus rapid diagnostic test(RDT) screening, and treatment with SP or amodiaquine plus artimisinin(AQ+AS) versus ITN plus IPTp using SP. It is to be carried out in pregnant women of all parities presenting at enrolling antenatal clinics with a gestation of 16 to 20 weeks at their first booking. The key objectives are to demonstrate that (1) the prevalence of severe anaemia (Hb \< 8g/dl) at 34 to 36 weeks of gestation (2) the prevalence of low birth weight (BW \< 2500g) at delivery or within 72 hours after delivery (3) the prevalence of placenta parasitaemia and (4) the incidence of serious and non-serious adverse events in the ITN plus RDT screening and treatment arm are not greater than those in the ITN plus IPTp arm. Alongside the clinical assessments, health care cost assessments will be done to determine the cost-effectiveness of the two delivery strategies measured as cases of severe maternal anaemia averted.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Feb 2007
Typical duration for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 5, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 7, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2009
CompletedOctober 20, 2016
February 1, 2014
2 years
February 5, 2007
October 19, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Prevalence of severe maternal anaemia (Hb < 8g/dl) at 34 to 36 weeks of gestation.
At 34 to 36 weeks of gestation
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Prevalence of low birth weight (BW < 2500g) at delivery or within 72 hours of delivery.
At delivery or within 72 hours of delivery.
Prevalence of maternal anaemia (Hb < 11g/dl) at 34 to 36 weeks of gestation.
At 34 to 36 weeks of gestation
Prevalence of placenta parasitaemia.
At delivery
Incidence of post-intervention malaria cases
Anytime after enrolment and prior to delivery
Proportions of congenital anomalies in live births among the intervention groups stratified by gestation, gravidity, parity and age.
At delivery
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
1
EXPERIMENTALOptiMAL® antigen screening and treatment with SP plus LLIN
2
EXPERIMENTALOptiMAL® antigen screening and treatment with AQ+AS plus LLIN
3
ACTIVE COMPARATORSP-IPTp plus LLIN
Interventions
Eligible women will be allocated randomly to one of three groups and treated as follows: Arm 1 (OptiMAL® antigen screening and treatment with SP plus LLIN group) - a woman in this will receive 1500mg/75mg (S/P) administered at the ANC as single dose on enrollment if her screening test is positive. Arm 2 (OptiMAL® antigen screening and treatment with AQ+AS plus LLIN) - a woman in this will receive 300mg of AQ and 100mg co-administered two times a day for 3 days if her screening test is positive. The first dose is observed on enrolment day at the ANC. Arm 3 (SP-IPTp plus LLIN group) - a woman in this will receive 1500mg/75mg (S/P) administered at the ANC as single dose on enrollment as recommended by national policy. All enrolled women will be given one long lasting insecticide treated bed net each for use.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Her pregnancy is confirmed at 16 to 24 weeks at their first booking.
- She is willing to participate and complete the test schedule, and has given informed consent.
- She is willing to have supervised delivered at maternity units in the district.
- She lives within the study district.
You may not qualify if:
- She has a past obstetric and medical history that will adversely affect the interpretation of outcomes such as repeated stillbirths and eclampsia.
- She has a haemoglobin level below 5.0 g/dl.
- She has malaria that is severe enough to require parenteral medication.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Juaben Government Hospital
Juaben, Ashanti Region, Ghana
Related Publications (1)
Tagbor H, Bruce J, Agbo M, Greenwood B, Chandramohan D. Intermittent screening and treatment versus intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy: a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. PLoS One. 2010 Dec 28;5(12):e14425. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014425.
PMID: 21203389DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Harry Tagbor, DrPH
School of Medical Sciences, KNUST, Kumasi, Ghana
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Brian Greenwood, MD
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Daniel Chandramohan, PhD
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jane Bruce, MSc
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Edmund Browne, PhD
School of Medical Sciences, KNUST, Kumasi, Ghana
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 5, 2007
First Posted
February 7, 2007
Study Start
February 1, 2007
Primary Completion
February 1, 2009
Study Completion
September 1, 2009
Last Updated
October 20, 2016
Record last verified: 2014-02