Comparison of Video Consent Versus Routine Consent for Participation in Research Studies
Comparison of Video Consent and Routine Consent for Research
1 other identifier
interventional
382
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to examine a novel technique for improving the informed consent process for participation in research by the older psychiatric population.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable schizophrenia
Started Dec 2003
Longer than P75 for not_applicable schizophrenia
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2003
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 31, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 1, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2010
CompletedJune 19, 2013
January 1, 2011
6.2 years
January 31, 2007
June 18, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Comprehension of the consent materials, including understanding of the risks and benefits of participating in the study
Measured at 1-month follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Association of subject characteristics with the degree of benefit derived from the DVD-based consent over routine consent procedure
Measured at 1-month follow-up
Study Arms (8)
DVD patient high risk
EXPERIMENTALPatients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder randomized to the DVD, high risk version
DVD patient low risk
EXPERIMENTALPatient with a diagnosis of schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder randomized to DVD consent, low risk version
DVD normal high risk
EXPERIMENTALParticipants with no psychiatric diagnosis randomized to DVD consent, high risk version
DVD normal low risk
EXPERIMENTALParticipants with no psychiatric diagnosis randomized to DVD consent, low risk version
Routine control high risk
EXPERIMENTALParticipants with no psychiatric diagnosis randomized to routine consent, high risk version
Routine control low risk
EXPERIMENTALParticipants with no psychiatric diagnosis randomized to routine consent, low risk version
Routine patient low risk
EXPERIMENTALParticipants with schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder randomized to routine consent, low risk version
Routine patient high risk
EXPERIMENTALParticipants with schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder randomized to routine consent, high risk version
Interventions
Participants are randomized to DVD enhanced consent that is either high risk or low risk.
Participants are assigned to the routine, standard consent.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia or no current or past major neuropsychiatric disorder (normal subjects)
- Fluency in English
- Written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Known or suspected dementia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of California, San Diego
San Diego, California, 92161, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dilip V. Jeste, MD
UCSD
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 31, 2007
First Posted
February 1, 2007
Study Start
December 1, 2003
Primary Completion
February 1, 2010
Study Completion
February 1, 2010
Last Updated
June 19, 2013
Record last verified: 2011-01