NCT00425516

Brief Summary

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, known as "first" or "induction chemotherapy" in the therapeutic assumption of breast cancer is based on the narrow dependence preclinically revealed between primary tumour, tumoral angiogenesis and growth of distant metastases. The results of the Aberdeen Group (Smith et al, 2002 ; Hutcheon et al, 2003), of the NSABP B27 trial (Bear et al, 2003) and of the Gepar-Duo Group (Von Minckwitz et al, 2002) have shown that a sequential protocol, using docetaxel after an anthracycline-based combination, allowed a better clinical response leading to more frequent conservative surgeries and, more importantly, to an increase in the rate of complete pathological response, assessing a better efficacy. The use of a reference adjuvant protocol as a neo-adjuvant treatment is fully admissible because 7 randomized trials have shown a perfect equivalence between an adjuvant protocol and the same chemotherapy given as an induction treatment Even keeping the principle of a sequential treatment, a crucial question is to know if this sequential treatment should be the same for all patients, or if the oncologist could get a better complete pathological response, disease-free or overall survival rates by an adaptation of treatment to the objective result beginning after 2 FEC 100 courses by modulation of the following courses. We will use as a primary regimen 3 FEC cycles + 3 TAXOTERE cycles, a standard adjuvant regimen (noted in the Temporary Protocol of Treatment of the Inca page 5 (October 2005) as well as in Saint Paul de Vence 2005 recommendations for adjuvant chemotherapy (Oncologie -- volume 7 - N°5, August 2005, p 370). This standard treatment will be compared to the same chemotherapy modulated in its repartition according to results obtained by subsequent tumor evaluations during induction therapy.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
264

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2007

Longer than P75 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

6 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2007

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 22, 2007

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 23, 2007

Completed
7.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

October 1, 2014

Status Verified

February 1, 2007

Enrollment Period

7.6 years

First QC Date

January 22, 2007

Last Update Submit

September 30, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

neoadjuvant chemotherapybreast cancersequential treatment

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Improvement of complete pathological response rate at surgery after 6 chemotherapy cycles

    after 6 cycles of chemotherapy

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Tolerance according to NCI-CTC criteria

    after each cycle of chemotherapy

  • Objective clinical, echographic, mammographic responses after 6 cycles

    after every 2 cycles of chemotherapy treatment

  • Breast conservation rate

    at surgery

  • Study of biological predictive factors of chemosensitivity and resistance by immunological and molecular biology techniques)

    before receive chemotherapy

  • Overall and relapse-free survivals

    5 years after diagnosis

Study Arms (2)

standard (A)

NO INTERVENTION

3 FEC100 followed 3 Taxotere

Modulated (B)

EXPERIMENTAL

possibility treatments receive: 2 FEC100 followed by 4 Taxotere 4 FEC100 followed by 2 Taxotere 6 FEC 100

Drug: TaxotereDrug: 5-FluorouracilDrug: EpirubicinDrug: Cyclophosphamide

Interventions

Also known as: Docetaxel
Modulated (B)
Modulated (B)
Modulated (B)
Modulated (B)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient with histological proof of non metastatic breast cancer, whose clinical tumor diameter is \> 2 cm, or \< 2 cm, but situated in areolar area of the nipple.
  • T2-T3, N0-N1 tumor, non-inflammatory, unilateral, non-metastatic, grade II - III, HER2-neu negative, without extension beyond the breast and axillar area.
  • Performance Status = 0-1 WHO.
  • Patient non pretreated for breast cancer.
  • Patient without cardiac pathology and without anthracyclines contra-indication (assessed by normal ejection fraction).
  • Normal haematological, renal and hepatic functions : PNN \> 2.109 /l, platelets \> 100. 109 /l, Hb \> 10 g/dl, normal bilirubin serum , ASAT and ALAT \< 2,5 ULN, alkaline phosphatases \< 2,5 ULN, creatinin \< 140 µmol/l or creatinin clearance \> 60 ml/min
  • Written informed consent dated and signed by the patient

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient presenting with plurifocal tumors, multicentric tumor, bilateral tumor.
  • Grade I well differentiated tumor.
  • HER2 neu 3 + (ICH or FISH or CISH) tumor.
  • Non measurable lesion, in the two diameters, whatever radiological methods used.
  • Patient presenting microcalcifications for which breast conservation is not possible.
  • Patient already operated for breast cancer or having had primary axillar node dissection.
  • Patient having antecedent of other cancer, exception for in situ uterine cervix or basocellular skin cancer, considered as healed.
  • Patient should not receive treatment with any other investigational drug and should not participate to another clinical study in a delay \< 30 days or should not be pre-treated by cytostatic chemotherapy.
  • Antecedents of allergy to polysorbate 80.
  • Patient who is pregnant or lactating and not using effective contraceptive method.
  • Any psychological, familial, sociological or geographical condition that may potentially hamper compliance with the study protocol and follow up schedule, assessed with the patient prior to registration in the trial

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (6)

Hospital center

Brive-la-Gaillarde, 19100, France

Location

Centre Jean Perrin

Clermont-Ferrand, 63011, France

Location

University Hospital La Tronche

Grenoble, 38043, France

Location

Edouard Herriot University Hospital

Lyon, 69000, France

Location

Institut Jean Godinot

Reims, 51056, France

Location

Institut de Cancérologie de la Loire

Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, 42270, France

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Roché H, Fumoleau P, Spielman M et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2004;88(suppl1):S16. Abstract 27

    BACKGROUND
  • Mouret-Reynier MA, Abrial CJ, Ferriere JP, Amat S, Cure HD, Kwiatkowski FG, Feillel VA, Lebouedec G, Penault-Llorca FM, Chollet PJ. Neoadjuvant FEC 100 for operable breast cancer: eight-year experience at Centre Jean Perrin. Clin Breast Cancer. 2004 Oct;5(4):303-7. doi: 10.3816/cbc.2004.n.035.

    PMID: 15507178BACKGROUND
  • Wang-Lopez Q, Mouret-Reynier MA, Savoye AM, Abrial C, Kwiatkowski F, Garbar C, DuBray-Longeras P, Eymard JC, Lebouedec G, Vanpraagh I, Penault-Llorca F, Chollet P, Cure H. Is it important to adapt neoadjuvant chemotherapy to the visible clinical response? An open randomized phase II study comparing response-guided and standard treatments in HER2-negative operable breast cancer. Oncologist. 2015 Mar;20(3):243-4. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0400. Epub 2015 Jan 30.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Breast Neoplasms

Interventions

DocetaxelFluorouracilEpirubicinCyclophosphamide

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsBreast DiseasesSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

TaxoidsCyclodecanesCycloparaffinsHydrocarbons, AlicyclicHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsOrganic ChemicalsDiterpenesTerpenesUracilPyrimidinonesPyrimidinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsDoxorubicinDaunorubicinAnthracyclinesNaphthacenesPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsHydrocarbons, AromaticPolycyclic CompoundsAminoglycosidesGlycosidesCarbohydratesPhosphoramide MustardsNitrogen Mustard CompoundsMustard CompoundsHydrocarbons, HalogenatedPhosphoramidesOrganophosphorus Compounds

Study Officials

  • Philippe Chollet, Pr

    Centre Jean Perrin

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 22, 2007

First Posted

January 23, 2007

Study Start

January 1, 2007

Primary Completion

August 1, 2014

Study Completion

August 1, 2014

Last Updated

October 1, 2014

Record last verified: 2007-02

Locations