Breast Cancer Treated by Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
Clinical Trial of the Neoadjuvant Standard Chemotherapy 3 FEC 100 + 3 TAXOTERE Protocol Versus the Same Protocol Adapted as a Function of Clinical Response
1 other identifier
interventional
264
1 country
6
Brief Summary
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, known as "first" or "induction chemotherapy" in the therapeutic assumption of breast cancer is based on the narrow dependence preclinically revealed between primary tumour, tumoral angiogenesis and growth of distant metastases. The results of the Aberdeen Group (Smith et al, 2002 ; Hutcheon et al, 2003), of the NSABP B27 trial (Bear et al, 2003) and of the Gepar-Duo Group (Von Minckwitz et al, 2002) have shown that a sequential protocol, using docetaxel after an anthracycline-based combination, allowed a better clinical response leading to more frequent conservative surgeries and, more importantly, to an increase in the rate of complete pathological response, assessing a better efficacy. The use of a reference adjuvant protocol as a neo-adjuvant treatment is fully admissible because 7 randomized trials have shown a perfect equivalence between an adjuvant protocol and the same chemotherapy given as an induction treatment Even keeping the principle of a sequential treatment, a crucial question is to know if this sequential treatment should be the same for all patients, or if the oncologist could get a better complete pathological response, disease-free or overall survival rates by an adaptation of treatment to the objective result beginning after 2 FEC 100 courses by modulation of the following courses. We will use as a primary regimen 3 FEC cycles + 3 TAXOTERE cycles, a standard adjuvant regimen (noted in the Temporary Protocol of Treatment of the Inca page 5 (October 2005) as well as in Saint Paul de Vence 2005 recommendations for adjuvant chemotherapy (Oncologie -- volume 7 - N°5, August 2005, p 370). This standard treatment will be compared to the same chemotherapy modulated in its repartition according to results obtained by subsequent tumor evaluations during induction therapy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Jan 2007
Longer than P75 for phase_2
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 22, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 23, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2014
CompletedOctober 1, 2014
February 1, 2007
7.6 years
January 22, 2007
September 30, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Improvement of complete pathological response rate at surgery after 6 chemotherapy cycles
after 6 cycles of chemotherapy
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Tolerance according to NCI-CTC criteria
after each cycle of chemotherapy
Objective clinical, echographic, mammographic responses after 6 cycles
after every 2 cycles of chemotherapy treatment
Breast conservation rate
at surgery
Study of biological predictive factors of chemosensitivity and resistance by immunological and molecular biology techniques)
before receive chemotherapy
Overall and relapse-free survivals
5 years after diagnosis
Study Arms (2)
standard (A)
NO INTERVENTION3 FEC100 followed 3 Taxotere
Modulated (B)
EXPERIMENTALpossibility treatments receive: 2 FEC100 followed by 4 Taxotere 4 FEC100 followed by 2 Taxotere 6 FEC 100
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient with histological proof of non metastatic breast cancer, whose clinical tumor diameter is \> 2 cm, or \< 2 cm, but situated in areolar area of the nipple.
- T2-T3, N0-N1 tumor, non-inflammatory, unilateral, non-metastatic, grade II - III, HER2-neu negative, without extension beyond the breast and axillar area.
- Performance Status = 0-1 WHO.
- Patient non pretreated for breast cancer.
- Patient without cardiac pathology and without anthracyclines contra-indication (assessed by normal ejection fraction).
- Normal haematological, renal and hepatic functions : PNN \> 2.109 /l, platelets \> 100. 109 /l, Hb \> 10 g/dl, normal bilirubin serum , ASAT and ALAT \< 2,5 ULN, alkaline phosphatases \< 2,5 ULN, creatinin \< 140 µmol/l or creatinin clearance \> 60 ml/min
- Written informed consent dated and signed by the patient
You may not qualify if:
- Patient presenting with plurifocal tumors, multicentric tumor, bilateral tumor.
- Grade I well differentiated tumor.
- HER2 neu 3 + (ICH or FISH or CISH) tumor.
- Non measurable lesion, in the two diameters, whatever radiological methods used.
- Patient presenting microcalcifications for which breast conservation is not possible.
- Patient already operated for breast cancer or having had primary axillar node dissection.
- Patient having antecedent of other cancer, exception for in situ uterine cervix or basocellular skin cancer, considered as healed.
- Patient should not receive treatment with any other investigational drug and should not participate to another clinical study in a delay \< 30 days or should not be pre-treated by cytostatic chemotherapy.
- Antecedents of allergy to polysorbate 80.
- Patient who is pregnant or lactating and not using effective contraceptive method.
- Any psychological, familial, sociological or geographical condition that may potentially hamper compliance with the study protocol and follow up schedule, assessed with the patient prior to registration in the trial
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (6)
Hospital center
Brive-la-Gaillarde, 19100, France
Centre Jean Perrin
Clermont-Ferrand, 63011, France
University Hospital La Tronche
Grenoble, 38043, France
Edouard Herriot University Hospital
Lyon, 69000, France
Institut Jean Godinot
Reims, 51056, France
Institut de Cancérologie de la Loire
Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, 42270, France
Related Publications (3)
Roché H, Fumoleau P, Spielman M et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2004;88(suppl1):S16. Abstract 27
BACKGROUNDMouret-Reynier MA, Abrial CJ, Ferriere JP, Amat S, Cure HD, Kwiatkowski FG, Feillel VA, Lebouedec G, Penault-Llorca FM, Chollet PJ. Neoadjuvant FEC 100 for operable breast cancer: eight-year experience at Centre Jean Perrin. Clin Breast Cancer. 2004 Oct;5(4):303-7. doi: 10.3816/cbc.2004.n.035.
PMID: 15507178BACKGROUNDWang-Lopez Q, Mouret-Reynier MA, Savoye AM, Abrial C, Kwiatkowski F, Garbar C, DuBray-Longeras P, Eymard JC, Lebouedec G, Vanpraagh I, Penault-Llorca F, Chollet P, Cure H. Is it important to adapt neoadjuvant chemotherapy to the visible clinical response? An open randomized phase II study comparing response-guided and standard treatments in HER2-negative operable breast cancer. Oncologist. 2015 Mar;20(3):243-4. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0400. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
PMID: 25637380DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Philippe Chollet, Pr
Centre Jean Perrin
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 22, 2007
First Posted
January 23, 2007
Study Start
January 1, 2007
Primary Completion
August 1, 2014
Study Completion
August 1, 2014
Last Updated
October 1, 2014
Record last verified: 2007-02