Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of ACZ885 in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
A 12-week, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group, Dose-finding Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of ACZ885 (Anti-interleukin-1beta Monoclonal Antibody) With Three Different Dose Regimens in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Despite Stable Treatment With Methotrexate Including 76-week and 96-week Extensions
3 other identifiers
interventional
274
6 countries
17
Brief Summary
The 12-week core study was designed to evaluate risk-benefit of three subcutaneous dose regimens of ACZ885, added on to stable methotrexate (MTX) therapy (greater than or equal to 7.5 mg/week), compared to placebo in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The study investigated the magnitude of effect as well as onset of effect for the different dose regimens. The primary objective of the extension studies was to assess long-term safety and tolerability of canakinumab (ACZ885) in patients with active RA. CACZ885A2201E1 evaluated this objective in patients who had participated in the core study (CACZ885A2201) and CACZ885A2201E2 did the same in patients who completed the first extension study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2 rheumatoid-arthritis
Started Nov 2006
Longer than P75 for phase_2 rheumatoid-arthritis
17 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 17, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 19, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 19, 2013
CompletedFebruary 10, 2014
June 1, 2013
1.8 years
January 17, 2007
April 2, 2013
January 14, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 50 Criteria Responders at Week 12
Participants were defined as ACR50 responders if they had at least a 50% improvement from Baseline in both the tender and the swollen 28-joint count, and in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: * Patient's pain assessment (assessed using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm); * Patient self-assessed disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score); * Acute phase reactant (high sensitivity C-reactive Protein \[hsCRP\]). Details on each of these components are provided in Outcome Measures 10-16. Participants were considered as non-responders if they failed the ACR50 criteria. Participants who prematurely discontinued due to insufficient therapeutic effect were also considered non-responders.
Baseline and Week 12
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 20 Criteria Responders During the Extension Phase
Participants were defined as ACR20 responders if they had at least a 20% improvement from Baseline in both the tender and the swollen 28-joint count, and in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: * Patient's pain assessment (assessed using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale \[VAS\]) * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm) * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm) * Patient self-assessed disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score) * Acute phase reactant (high sensitivity C-reactive Protein \[hsCRP\]). Participants were considered as non-responders if they failed the ACR20 criteria. Participants who prematurely discontinued due to insufficient therapeutic effect were also considered non-responders.
Baseline and Weeks 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 88, 100, 112 and 124
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 50 Criteria Responders During the Extension Phase
Participants were defined as ACR50 responders if they had at least a 50% improvement from Baseline in both the tender and the swollen 28-joint count, and in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: * Patient's pain assessment (assessed using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale \[VAS\]) * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm) * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm) * Patient self-assessed disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score) * Acute phase reactant (high sensitivity C-reactive Protein \[hsCRP\]). Participants were considered as non-responders if they failed the ACR50 criteria. Participants who prematurely discontinued due to insufficient therapeutic effect were also considered non-responders.
Baseline and Weeks 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 88, 100, 112 and 124
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 70 Criteria Responders During the Extension Phase
Participants were defined as ACR70 responders if they had at least a 70% improvement from Baseline in both the tender and the swollen 28-joint count, and in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: * Patient's pain assessment (assessed using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale \[VAS\]) * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm) * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm) * Patient self-assessed disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score) * Acute phase reactant (high sensitivity C-reactive Protein \[hsCRP\]). Participants were considered as non-responders if they failed the ACR70 criteria. Participants who prematurely discontinued due to insufficient therapeutic effect were also considered non-responders.
Baseline and Weeks 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 88, 100, 112 and 124
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 During the Extension Phase
The Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 is a combined index to measure the disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and includes the following variables: * The number of swollen and tender joints assessed using the 28-joint count; * C-reactive protein (CRP) in mg/L; * Patient's global assessment of disease activity measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale. The DAS28 score ranges from zero to ten. DAS28 above 5.1 means high disease activity whereas a DAS28 below 3.2 indicates low disease activity. Remission is achieved by a DAS28 lower than 2.6
Baseline and Weeks 24, 72 and 112
Secondary Outcomes (25)
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 50 Criteria Responders at Weeks 2, 4 and 8
Baseline and Weeks 2, 4 and 8
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 20 Criteria Responders
Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 70 Criteria Responders
Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
Number of Distinct Responders According to ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70 Criteria at Week 12
Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Swollen 28-joint Count
Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
- +20 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Canakinumab 600 mg IV + 300 mg q2wk
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received canakinumab 600 mg intravenous (IV) loading dose on Day 1 and 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg every 4 weeks.
Canakinumab 300 mg q2wk
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received canakinumab 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
Canakinumab 150 mg q4wk
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received canakinumab 150 mg subcutaneous injections every 4 weeks (q4wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants received placebo subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- CORE STUDY
- Cooperative male or non-pregnant, non-lactating female patients at least 18 years of age who signed an informed consent before the initiation of any study procedure.
- Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) classified by American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1987 revised criteria and with symptoms for at least 3 months before randomization.
- Functional status class I, II or III classified according to the ACR 1991 revised criteria.
- Patients treated with methotrexate (MTX) at the maximum tolerated (≤25 mg/week) and stable dose of ≥7.5 mg/week for at least 12 weeks before randomization.
- Patients who had failed any disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (including biologic agents and any DMARD used in combination with MTX) were allowed.
- For patients with previous treatment of biological therapy, the following wash-out periods were required before randomization:
- days for Kineret™ (anakinra) - with a terminal half-life of 4 to 6 hours (s.c. route).
- weeks for Enbrel® (etanercept) - with a terminal half-life of 102 ± 30 hours (s.c.
- route).
- weeks for Remicade® (infliximab) - with a terminal half-life of 8.0-9. 5 days (intravenous (i.v.) infusion).
- weeks for Humira® (adalimumab) - with a terminal half-life of 10-20 days (average 2 weeks) (subcutaneous (s.c.) route).
- weeks for Orencia® (abatacept) - with a terminal half-life of 13.1 (8-25) days (i.v. infusion).
- weeks for any other biologic - or 10 half-lives, whichever was longer.
- Patients who took systemic corticosteroids had to be on a stable dose of ≤10 mg/d prednisone or equivalent for at least 4 weeks before randomization.
- +31 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Novartislead
Study Sites (17)
Pinnacle Research Group
Anniston, Alabama, 36207, United States
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States
Sun Valley Arthritis Center, Ltd
Peoria, Arizona, 85381, United States
Catalina Pointe Arthritis & Rheumatology Specialists
Tucson, Arizona, 85704, United States
Arthritis Center
Palm Harbor, Florida, 34684, United States
Arthritis Research of Florida, Inc.
Palm Harbor, Florida, 34684, United States
The Arthritis Center
Springfield, Illinois, 62704, United States
St. Louis Cener for Clinical Research
St Louis, Missouri, 63128, United States
The Center for Rheumatology
Albany, New York, 12206, United States
AAIR Research Center
Rochester, New York, 14618, United States
Oregon Health Sciences University
Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States
Tacoma Center for Arthritis Research
Tacoma, Washington, 98405, United States
Novartis
Vienna, Austria
Novartis
Vilvoorde, Belgium
Novartis
Dorval, Quebec, Canada
Novartis
Nuremberg, Germany
Novartis
Barcelona, Spain
Related Publications (1)
Alten R, Gomez-Reino J, Durez P, Beaulieu A, Sebba A, Krammer G, Preiss R, Arulmani U, Widmer A, Gitton X, Kellner H. Efficacy and safety of the human anti-IL-1beta monoclonal antibody canakinumab in rheumatoid arthritis: results of a 12-week, Phase II, dose-finding study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Jul 7;12:153. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-153.
PMID: 21736751DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Study Director
- Organization
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 17, 2007
First Posted
January 19, 2007
Study Start
November 1, 2006
Primary Completion
September 1, 2008
Study Completion
October 1, 2009
Last Updated
February 10, 2014
Results First Posted
June 19, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-06