NCT00423943

Brief Summary

Patients with schizophrenia have problems in thinking, known as cognitive dysfunction. This appears to be responsible for their difficulties in social and occupational functioning. One particular cognitive function that may be important for schizophrenia is called context processing. This refers to the ability to properly use information in the environment to guide thinking and behavior so that it is appropriate to the present circumstance. Problems with this function may explain why patients with schizophrenia think and act in unusual ways, and often have problems managing aspects of their lives that healthy adults take for granted. This cognitive function depends on a region of the brain called the prefrontal cortex, which shows impaired function in schizophrenia as well. Unfortunately, the biochemical aspects of this dysfunction are presently unknown, and it is not clear whether current psychiatric medications can improve this function. A recent FDA-approved medication that may improve this function is modafinil. Studies in animals and healthy adults show that this medication can improve cognitive functions which are related to context processing. We plan to study the effects of modafinil on context processing and the brain activity that underlies this function. We will use functional MRI and electrophysiology to examine the effects of modafinil, both after a single dose and after sustained (4 week) treatment. We predict that when patients receive modafinil they will perform better on cognitive tests and have improved activity in the regions of the brain that are responsible for these cognitive processes.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
33

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_4 schizophrenia

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2005

Longer than P75 for phase_4 schizophrenia

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2005

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 16, 2007

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 18, 2007

Completed
5.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2012

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2012

Completed
4.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

September 29, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

September 29, 2017

Status Verified

August 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

7.3 years

First QC Date

January 16, 2007

Results QC Date

January 18, 2017

Last Update Submit

August 31, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

cognitionmemory

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Percent Change in Accuracy on High-control (i.e., Difficult) Condition of Preparing to Overcome Prepotency Task

    Accuracy change on high-control (i.e., difficult) condition of Preparing to Overcome Prepotency (POP) Task. For high-control condition (red-cue), subjects responded in the incongruent direction (eg, for a right-pointing arrow, press the left button, and vice versa). Increased values indicate improved performance.

    Baseline, 4 weeks

  • Control-related BOLD Signal Change in Locus Coeruleus

    BOLD signal change on high-control (i.e. difficult) condition versus low-control (i.e. easy) condition, on Preparing to Overcome Prepotency Task, measured by fMRI after 4-week treatment.

    4 weeks

  • Gamma Power Change in Count of Clusters

    Power in Gamma frequency range by scalp electrophysiology after single-dose and after 4-week treatment: Count of Clusters (defined as those with statistically-significant Task-Related Increase, i.e. relatively larger value of wavelet coefficient in wavelet analysis of signal) for high-control (i.e. difficult) condition versus Low-control (i.e. easy) condition, in Oscillatory Power in Time-Frequency Spectrogram. Increased values indicate improved function.

    4 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in Positive Symptoms

    Baseline, 4 weeks

  • Change in Negative Symptoms

    Baseline, 4 weeks

Study Arms (2)

D

EXPERIMENTAL

modafinil

Drug: modafinil

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

placebo

Drug: Placebos

Interventions

200 milligrams daily dose

Also known as: Provigil
D

capsule containing placebo

Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 54 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • adults age 18-54
  • diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, or healthy with no personal or family history of mental illness
  • able to provide informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • history of significant head injury or other neurological illness
  • active psychiatric illness requiring significant acute care
  • significant intellectual impairment (e.g. standardized full-scale IQ \< 70)
  • history of medical illness or treatment that either interferes with experimental measures (e.g. cerebrovascular disease, anemias, etc.) or is associated with significant increase in risk from modafinil treatment (e.g. cardiac disease)
  • significant active substance abuse
  • presence of ferromagnetic foreign body or prosthesis
  • active pregnancy
  • active treatment with medications that have drug interactions with modafinil

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine

Los Angeles, California, 90095, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

SchizophreniaPsychotic Disorders

Interventions

Modafinil

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic DisordersMental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Benzhydryl CompoundsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsOrganic Chemicals

Results Point of Contact

Title
Michael Minzenberg
Organization
University of California, Los Angeles

Study Officials

  • Michael J Minzenberg, MD

    University of California, Los Angeles

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Cameron S Carter, MD

    University of California Davis School of Medicine

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 16, 2007

First Posted

January 18, 2007

Study Start

September 1, 2005

Primary Completion

December 1, 2012

Study Completion

December 1, 2012

Last Updated

September 29, 2017

Results First Posted

September 29, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-08

Locations