NCT00421915

Brief Summary

The primary objective of the study was to compare the efficacy of etanercept (25 mg, twice weekly) with that of placebo based on the percentage of patients who achieve the Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) response criteria (ASAS 20%) at week 12.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
84

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2002

Shorter than P25 for phase_3

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2002

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2002

Completed
4.4 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 8, 2007

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 15, 2007

Completed
Last Updated

January 15, 2007

Status Verified

January 1, 2007

First QC Date

January 8, 2007

Last Update Submit

January 12, 2007

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • To compare the efficacy of etanercept (25 mg, twice weekly) with that of placebo based on the

  • percentage of patients who achieved the assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS 20%) response criteria at week 12.

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • To assess: 1) the safety of etanercept in this patient population; 2) the efficacy of etanercept

  • compared with that of placebo using the ASAS response criteria at 50% and 70% levels at week 12.

Interventions

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Diagnosis of AS (defined by Modified New York Criteria for Ankylosing Spondylitis).
  • Active AS (defined by the average of scores on the visual analog scale \[VAS\] of ≥ 30 for duration and intensity of morning stiffness and by 2 of the following: VAS for patient global assessment ≥ 30; average of VAS for nocturnal and total pain ≥ 30; BASFI ≥ 30 (all scores on a scale of 0 to 100).
  • to 70 years of age.

You may not qualify if:

  • Complete ankylosis (fusion) of spine.
  • Previous receipt of etanercept, antibody to tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), or other TNFα inhibitors.
  • Use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) other than hydroxychloroquine, sulphasalazine, or methotrexate within 4 weeks of baseline.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (2)

  • Baraliakos X, Szumski AE, Kwok KK, Vlahos B, Borlenghi CE. Long-term Etanercept Response for Patients with Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis Based on Achievement of Early, Intermediate, or Late Responses During Index Studies. Rheumatol Ther. 2024 Jun;11(3):583-597. doi: 10.1007/s40744-024-00656-3. Epub 2024 Mar 15.

  • Baraliakos X, Szumski A, Koenig AS, Jones H. The role of C-reactive protein as a predictor of treatment response in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019 Jun;48(6):997-1004. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.10.019. Epub 2018 Nov 2.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Spondylitis, Ankylosing

Interventions

Etanercept

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Axial SpondyloarthritisSpondylarthropathiesSpondylarthritisSpondylitisSpinal DiseasesBone DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesAnkylosisJoint DiseasesArthritis

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Immunoglobulin Fc FragmentsImmunoglobulin FragmentsPeptide FragmentsPeptidesAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsImmunoglobulin Constant RegionsImmunoglobulinsImmunoproteinsBlood ProteinsProteinsSerum GlobulinsGlobulinsReceptors, Tumor Necrosis FactorReceptors, CytokineReceptors, ImmunologicReceptors, Cell SurfaceMembrane Proteins

Study Officials

  • Medical Monitor

    Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 8, 2007

First Posted

January 15, 2007

Study Start

March 1, 2002

Study Completion

August 1, 2002

Last Updated

January 15, 2007

Record last verified: 2007-01