NCT00195819

Brief Summary

The purpose of the study is to assess the safety and clinical efficacy of adalimumab in subjects with active ankylosing spondylitis

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
82

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2003

Longer than P75 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

9 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2003

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2004

Completed
12 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 16, 2005

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 20, 2005

Completed
3.7 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2009

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 28, 2010

Completed
Last Updated

June 28, 2011

Status Verified

June 1, 2011

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

September 16, 2005

Results QC Date

December 17, 2009

Last Update Submit

June 24, 2011

Conditions

Keywords

ankylosing spondylitisadalimumab

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Number of Subjects With a Reduction in Signs and Symptoms as Measured by Assessments of Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 20 Response at Week 12

    ASAS 20 responders - improvement of \>=20% and absolute improvement of \>=10 units from Baseline in a visual analog scale (VAS) 0 \[no disease activity\]-100 \[high disease activity\]) for \>=3 of 4 domains; Patient's Global Assessment of disease activity VAS; (0\[none\]-100 \[severe\]), Total Back Pain VAS; (0 \[no pain\]-100 \[severe\]), BAth Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) VAS (0 \[easy \]-100\[impossible\]); and Inflammation VAS; (1 \[no pain\] to 10 \[severe pain\]) and absence of deterioration in the potential remaining domain. Applied to each scale and not to an overall global scale.

    Week 12

  • Mean Change in the Modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS) Compared Against a Historical Control Group (Outcomes in Ankylosing Spondylitis International Study [OASIS]) Using the ANCOVA Model Adjusting for Baseline mSASSS Score

    Radiographic progression was based on change in mSASSS scoring (comparison of the means) from double-blind Baseline visit to Week 104. The mSASSS is the sum of the lumbar and cervical spine score ( 0 \[no change\] to 72 \[progression\]), derived from scoring the anterior site of the lumbar spine (T12 to S1) and the cervical spine (C2 to T1) as either 0 (normal), 1 (erosion, sclerosis, or squaring), 2 (syndesmophyte), 3 (bridging syndesmophyte), or N (vertebral body not evaluable). Data from NCT00195819 was compared with data from AS patients in OASIS.

    Baseline and Week 104

Secondary Outcomes (42)

  • Number of Subjects With a Reduction of Signs and Symptoms as Measured in Assessments of Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 20 - Through Week 260 of Adalimumab Exposure

    Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260

  • Number of Subjects With a Reduction of Signs and Symptoms as Measured by Assessments in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) ASAS 50 Through Week 260 of Adalimumab Exposure

    Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260

  • Number of Subjects With a Reduction of Signs and Symptoms as Measured in Assessments of Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) ASAS 70 Through Week 260 of Adalimumab Exposure

    Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260

  • Mean Change in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity in Subjects With Adalimumab Exposure Through Week 260

    Weeks 12, 24, 36, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260

  • Number of Subjects With a Reduction of Signs and Symptoms as Measured in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (an Individual Component of ASAS 20) Through Week 260 of Adalimumab Exposure

    Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260

  • +37 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Adalimumab

EXPERIMENTAL
Biological: adalimumab (D2E7)

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR
Biological: placebo

Interventions

Adalimumab 40 mg every other week (eow)

Also known as: ABT-D2E7, adalimumab, Humira
Adalimumab
placeboBIOLOGICAL

Placebo every other week (eow)

Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subject was age 18 or older and in relatively good health (Investigator discretion) with a recent stable medical history.
  • Subject met the definition of AS based on the Modified New York Criteria.
  • Subject had an inadequate response to or intolerance to one or more NSAIDs as defined by the Investigator

You may not qualify if:

  • Subject had previously received anti-TNF therapy.
  • Subject considered by the investigator, for any reason, to be an unsuitable candidate for the study
  • Female subject who is pregnant or breast-feeding or considering becoming pregnant

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (9)

Site Ref # / Investigator 74

Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N1, Canada

Location

Site Ref # / Investigator 70

Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2S2, Canada

Location

Site Ref # / Investigator 79

Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1L7, Canada

Location

Site Ref # / Investigator 64

Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3N OK6, Canada

Location

Site Ref # / Investigator 78

St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, A1C 5B8, Canada

Location

Site Ref # / Investigator 75

Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5, Canada

Location

Site Ref # / Investigator 63

Toronto, Ontario, M5L 3L9, Canada

Location

Site Ref # / Investigator 62

Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2S8, Canada

Location

Site Ref # / Investigator 77

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7K 0H6, Canada

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Revicki DA, Rentz AM, Luo MP, Wong RL. Psychometric characteristics of the short form 36 health survey and functional assessment of chronic illness Therapy-Fatigue subscale for patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011 May 22;9:36. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-9-36.

  • van der Heijde D, Salonen D, Weissman BN, Landewe R, Maksymowych WP, Kupper H, Ballal S, Gibson E, Wong R; Canadian (M03-606) study group; ATLAS study group. Assessment of radiographic progression in the spines of patients with ankylosing spondylitis treated with adalimumab for up to 2 years. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11(4):R127. doi: 10.1186/ar2794. Epub 2009 Aug 24.

  • Lambert RG, Salonen D, Rahman P, Inman RD, Wong RL, Einstein SG, Thomson GT, Beaulieu A, Choquette D, Maksymowych WP. Adalimumab significantly reduces both spinal and sacroiliac joint inflammation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Dec;56(12):4005-14. doi: 10.1002/art.23044.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Spondylitis, Ankylosing

Interventions

Adalimumab

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Axial SpondyloarthritisSpondylarthropathiesSpondylarthritisSpondylitisSpinal DiseasesBone DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesAnkylosisJoint DiseasesArthritis

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodiesImmunoglobulinsImmunoproteinsBlood ProteinsProteinsAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsSerum GlobulinsGlobulins

Limitations and Caveats

The modified SASSS was pooled with a study (NCT00085644) similar in structure and sharing the same endpoints as this study.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Global Medical Services
Organization
Abbott

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 16, 2005

First Posted

September 20, 2005

Study Start

December 1, 2003

Primary Completion

October 1, 2004

Study Completion

June 1, 2009

Last Updated

June 28, 2011

Results First Posted

April 28, 2010

Record last verified: 2011-06

Locations