NCT00410046

Brief Summary

The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the health care resource utilization and work status of patients with ankylosing spondylitis undergoing treatment with etanercept by comparing study evaluations with the baseline evaluations in the ASCEND (0881A3-402)(NCT00247962) study.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
84

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2006

Geographic Reach
4 countries

16 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2006

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 8, 2006

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 12, 2006

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2008

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2008

Completed
3.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 11, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

May 11, 2012

Status Verified

April 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

December 8, 2006

Results QC Date

October 30, 2009

Last Update Submit

April 9, 2012

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Number of Patients Using Healthcare Resources in the 48 Weeks Before and During Treatment

    Healthcare resources were defined as hospital admissions, therapeutic warm baths, physiotherapist visits, and outpatient physician visits. Healthcare resource utilization was evaluated using a questionnaire asking patients whether or not they had used the healthcare resource during the 48 weeks preceding enrollment in study 0881A3-402 (NCT00247962) and during the 48 weeks of treatment in this extension study (0881A3-405).

    96 weeks

  • Number of Patients Taking Sick Leave in the 48 Weeks Before and During Treatment

    Patients were asked whether or not they had taken sick leave during the 48 weeks preceding enrollment in study 0881A3-402 (NCT00247962) and during the 48 weeks of treatment in this extension study (0881A3-405).

    96 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (12)

  • Number of Patients Utilizing Healthcare Resources During 48 Weeks of Treatment

    48 weeks

  • Number of Times Healthcare Resources Were Used Per Patient During 48 Weeks of Treatment

    48 weeks

  • Number of Patients With Sick Leave During 48 Weeks Treatment

    48 weeks

  • Number of Sick Days Per Patient During the 48 Weeks of Treatment

    48 weeks

  • Change in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity From Baseline to Week 38

    Baseline and 38 weeks

  • +7 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Etanercept (ETN)

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients received ETN dose 50 mg once weekly or Sulphasalazine dose 3 g daily in study 402 for 16 weeks. Upon enrollment into study 405, all received subcutaneous injections of etanercept 50 mg once weekly for 36 weeks.

Drug: Enbrel (etanercept)

Interventions

Etanercept 50 mg SC injection once weekly

Also known as: Enbrel
Etanercept (ETN)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients who completed 16 weeks of treatment and have completed the baseline health care resource utilization questionnaire at screening in the ASCEND study 0881A3-402-WW from participating countries.

You may not qualify if:

  • Withdrawal from the ASCEND study for safety or any other reason.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (16)

Unknown Facility

Fredriksberg, DK-2000, Denmark

Location

Unknown Facility

Odense, DK-5000, Denmark

Location

Unknown Facility

Svendborg, DK-5700, Denmark

Location

Unknown Facility

Vejle, DK-7100, Denmark

Location

Unknown Facility

Helsinki, FIN-130, Finland

Location

Unknown Facility

Hyvinkää, FIN-05800, Finland

Location

Unknown Facility

Kuopio, FIN-70211, Finland

Location

Unknown Facility

Tampere, FIN-33100, Finland

Location

Unknown Facility

Stockholm, SE-17176, Sweden

Location

Unknown Facility

Basingstoke, RG249NA, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Bath, BA11RL, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Cambridge, CB22QQ, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Cannock, WS112XY, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Liverpool, L97AL, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Metropolitan Borough of Wirral, CH495PE, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Newcastle upon Tyne, NE77DN, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Baraliakos X, Szumski AE, Kwok KK, Vlahos B, Borlenghi CE. Long-term Etanercept Response for Patients with Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis Based on Achievement of Early, Intermediate, or Late Responses During Index Studies. Rheumatol Ther. 2024 Jun;11(3):583-597. doi: 10.1007/s40744-024-00656-3. Epub 2024 Mar 15.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Spondylitis, Ankylosing

Interventions

Etanercept

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Axial SpondyloarthritisSpondylarthropathiesSpondylarthritisSpondylitisSpinal DiseasesBone DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesAnkylosisJoint DiseasesArthritis

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Immunoglobulin Fc FragmentsImmunoglobulin FragmentsPeptide FragmentsPeptidesAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsImmunoglobulin Constant RegionsImmunoglobulinsImmunoproteinsBlood ProteinsProteinsSerum GlobulinsGlobulinsReceptors, Tumor Necrosis FactorReceptors, CytokineReceptors, ImmunologicReceptors, Cell SurfaceMembrane Proteins

Results Point of Contact

Title
U. S. Contact Center
Organization
Wyeth

Study Officials

  • Medical Monitor

    Wyeth Reserach

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 8, 2006

First Posted

December 12, 2006

Study Start

December 1, 2006

Primary Completion

October 1, 2008

Study Completion

October 1, 2008

Last Updated

May 11, 2012

Results First Posted

May 11, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-04

Locations