Pegfilgrastim Versus Filgrastim After High-dose Chemotherapy
2 other identifiers
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim, administered after high-dose chemotherapy and peripheral stem cell reinfusion.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Sep 2006
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 12, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 13, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2008
CompletedJuly 1, 2013
June 1, 2013
2.2 years
December 12, 2006
June 28, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Duration of aplasia period
At time of discharge from Unit
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Immunological reconstitution
1 year after transplantation
Study Arms (2)
Filgrastim
ACTIVE COMPARATORFilgrastim administration starting 1 day after autologous stem-cell reinfusion up to hemopoietic reconstitution (defined as more than 500/mm3 for 2 days)
Pegfilgrastim
EXPERIMENTALPegfilgrastim administered the day after autologous stem-cell reinfusion
Interventions
5 mcg/kg/day sc from day +1 after transplantation to hemopoietic reconstitution
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with hematological neoplasms or solid tumors candidable to high-dose chemotherapy with autologous peripheral stem cell reinfusion
- Adequate organ function
- Written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Use of other experimental drugs
- Active infection
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Istituto Clinico Humanitas
Rozzano, Milan, 20089, Italy
Related Publications (3)
Holmes FA, O'Shaughnessy JA, Vukelja S, Jones SE, Shogan J, Savin M, Glaspy J, Moore M, Meza L, Wiznitzer I, Neumann TA, Hill LR, Liang BC. Blinded, randomized, multicenter study to evaluate single administration pegfilgrastim once per cycle versus daily filgrastim as an adjunct to chemotherapy in patients with high-risk stage II or stage III/IV breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Feb 1;20(3):727-31. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.3.727.
PMID: 11821454BACKGROUNDFarese AM, Yang BB, Roskos L, Stead RB, MacVittie TJ. Pegfilgrastim, a sustained-duration form of filgrastim, significantly improves neutrophil recovery after autologous marrow transplantation in rhesus macaques. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2003 Aug;32(4):399-404. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1704156.
PMID: 12900776BACKGROUNDCastagna L, Bramanti S, Levis A, Michieli MG, Anastasia A, Mazza R, Giordano L, Sarina B, Todisco E, Gregorini AI, Santoro A. Pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell support. Ann Oncol. 2010 Jul;21(7):1482-1485. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp576. Epub 2009 Dec 11.
PMID: 20007996DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Armando Santoro, MD
Istituto Clinico Humanitas
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 12, 2006
First Posted
December 13, 2006
Study Start
September 1, 2006
Primary Completion
November 1, 2008
Study Completion
November 1, 2008
Last Updated
July 1, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-06