Prehospital CPAP vs. Usual Care for Acute Respiratory Failure
Prehospital CPAP Versus Usual Care for Acute Respiratory Failure: a Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of continuous positive airway pressure ventilation when applied by paramedics to individuals with severe breathing difficulties in the prehospital setting.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2002
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2002
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 29, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 30, 2006
CompletedJune 23, 2016
June 1, 2016
November 29, 2006
June 22, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
proportion of patients in each group endotracheally intubated prior to hospital discharge or death
Secondary Outcomes (3)
mortality
critical care unit length of stay
hospital length of stay
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- severe dyspnea
- respiratory rate \>25 breaths/minute
- hemodynamically stable
- able to cooperate with ventilatory support measures
- assessed by paramedics as being in urgent need of ETI and/or manual positive pressure ventilation
- a trip destination of the QEII Health Sciences Center or Dartmouth General Hospital
You may not qualify if:
- require ETI for immediate airway protection
- respiratory rate \< 8 breaths/minute
- evidence of hemodynamic instability
- cardiac ischemia
- any chest pain within 3 hours of presentation
- valid "do not resuscitate" advanced directive
- an inadequate supply of portable oxygen
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Dalhousie Universitylead
- Nova Scotia Health Authoritycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Dalhousie University
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 1V7, Canada
Related Publications (4)
Wang HE, Yealy DM. Out-of-hospital endotracheal intubation: where are we? Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Jun;47(6):532-41. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.01.016. Epub 2006 Feb 28.
PMID: 16713780BACKGROUNDWinck JC, Azevedo LF, Costa-Pereira A, Antonelli M, Wyatt JC. Efficacy and safety of non-invasive ventilation in the treatment of acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema--a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2006;10(2):R69. doi: 10.1186/cc4905.
PMID: 16646987BACKGROUNDHubble MW, Richards ME, Jarvis R, Millikan T, Young D. Effectiveness of prehospital continuous positive airway pressure in the management of acute pulmonary edema. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2006 Oct-Dec;10(4):430-9. doi: 10.1080/10903120600884848.
PMID: 16997770BACKGROUNDThompson J, Petrie DA, Ackroyd-Stolarz S, Bardua DJ. Out-of-hospital continuous positive airway pressure ventilation versus usual care in acute respiratory failure: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Sep;52(3):232-41, 241.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.01.006. Epub 2008 Apr 3.
PMID: 18387700DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
James Thompson, MD
University of British Columbia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 29, 2006
First Posted
November 30, 2006
Study Start
July 1, 2002
Study Completion
March 1, 2006
Last Updated
June 23, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-06