Effect of Targeting Left Ventricular Lead Position on the Rate of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.
INCREMENTAL
Investigating Non-response to Cardiac Resynchronization: Evaluation of Methods to Eliminate Non-response & Target Appropriate Lead Location (INCREMENTAL).
1 other identifier
interventional
96
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Identifying \& optimizing strategies to reduce the burden of heart failure is vital. Despite advances in pharmacotherapy, patients with heart failure are at high risk for death \& hospitalization. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) synchronizes ventricular mechanical activity, improves cardiac output \& reduces HF symptoms. However, \~50% of patients do not clearly respond to CRT. Sub-optimal placement of the LV pacing lead appears to be an important reason for non-response. This study will assess whether targeted LV lead placement will result in an increased probability of CRT response at 52 weeks vs. usual (lateral wall) lead placement.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Mar 2011
Longer than P75 for phase_2
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 13, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 15, 2006
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2015
CompletedNovember 24, 2015
November 1, 2015
3.1 years
November 13, 2006
November 20, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in end systolic volume plus reduction in symptoms
over 12 months
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Minnesota Living with Heart Failure score.
Change over 12 months
Short form thirty six score.
Change over 12 months
Specific Activity Scale score.
Change over 12 months
New York Heart Association class.
Change over 12 months
Six minute walk distance.
Change over 12 months
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
A
EXPERIMENTALTargeted LV lead placement
B
ACTIVE COMPARATORUsual LV lead placement
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- LV EF ≤ 0.40 measured within 3 months of enrollment,
- SAS class 3 or 4 symptoms indicative of moderate to severe functional capacity limitation due to heart failure within 1 month of enrollment.
- Confirmed dyssynchrony on screening echo (1.1.9), \&
- On stable doses of ACE inhibitor or angiotensin II blocker \& a beta-blocker for ≥ 2 months unless medically contra-indicated.
- Controlled heart rate if in permanent AF (resting \<70 \& maximal \<120).
You may not qualify if:
- Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent,
- Medical condition other than heart failure likely to cause death \< 1 year,
- Cardiac transplant planned within 6 months,
- Known contra-indication to transvenous CRT device implant (e.g., active sepsis, artificial tricuspid valve, known vascular occlusion that will prevent delivery of leads transvenously),
- Clinically significant myocardial infarction within last 2 months, or
- Coronary bypass graft surgery ≤ 2 months or coronary angioplasty ≤ 1 month
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Calgarylead
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)collaborator
- Medtroniccollaborator
- Hoffmann-La Rochecollaborator
- Cambridge Heart Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (3)
Foothills Hospital
Calgary, Alberta, T2N4N1, Canada
London Health Sciences
London, Ontario, Canada
Quebec Heart Institute
Ste-Foy, Quebec, G1V4G5, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Derek V Exner, MD, MPH
Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, University of Calgary
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor and Canada Research Chair in Cardiovascular Clinical Trials
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 13, 2006
First Posted
November 15, 2006
Study Start
March 1, 2011
Primary Completion
April 1, 2014
Study Completion
November 1, 2015
Last Updated
November 24, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-11