Cardiac Pacing, Artificial
14
2
3
8
Key Insights
Highlights
Success Rate
80% trial completion
Clinical Risk Assessment
Based on trial outcomes
High Risk
Score: 72/100
14.3%
2 terminated out of 14 trials
80.0%
-6.5% vs benchmark
7%
1 trials in Phase 3/4
13%
1 of 8 completed with results
Key Signals
Data Visualizations
Phase Distribution
Trial Status
Trial Success Rate
Benchmark: 86.5%
Based on 8 completed trials
Clinical Trials (14)
Leadless Pacemaker Registry: Outcomes and Follow-up From the University Hospital of St. Pölten
BIO|MASTER.CSP Study
Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device- Induced Remodelling of Tricuspid Valve and Right Chambers
Rapid Ventricular Pacing During Cerebral Aneurysm Surgery: a Study Concerning the Safety for Heart and Brain
Acute Effects of LBBP Versus BVP for CRT
Electrical Resynchronization and Acute Hemodynamic Effects of Direct His Bundle Pacing Compared to Biventricular Pacing
Transcoronary Pacing and Myocardial Viability
Morbidity, Mortality and Gender Differences in Patients With Pacemakers
Rapid Ventricular Pacing During Cerebral Aneurysm Surgery: a Retrospective Study Concerning the Safety for Heart and Brain
Effect of Targeting Left Ventricular Lead Position on the Rate of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.
Dual Chamber Versus Single Chamber Cardiac Pacing in People 80 Years of Age and Older
Acoustic Cardiographic Assessment of Heart Function and the Role of Phrenic Nerve Stimulation
Optimize RV Selective Site Pacing Clinical Trial
Closed Loop Stimulation, Cognitive Performance, and Quality of Life in Pacemaker Patients