Multihance at 3 Tesla (3T) in Brain Tumors
A Phase IV Double-blind Multicenter Randomized Crossover Study to Compare 0.10 mmol/kg of Multihance With 0.10 mmol.kg of Magnevist in Magnetic Resonance Imaging(MRI) of the Brain at 3T
1 other identifier
interventional
46
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Compare the efficacy of MultiHance and Magnevist
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Nov 2006
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 12, 2006
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 6, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 31, 2009
CompletedNovember 5, 2020
March 1, 2015
1.3 years
September 12, 2006
March 30, 2009
October 14, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Global Diagnostic Preference Between the Two Exams
Assessed by 3 blinded Readers for each of the 41 patients who had both MultiHance and Magnevist post dose MRI exam to assess whether the image with MultiHance was preferred, both contrast agents were equal, or the image with Magnevist was preferred. Each patient's image was reviewed by 3 readers.
Postdose Images for MultiHance Exam and for Magnevist Exam Compared
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Lesion Border Delineation
Postdose Images for MultiHance Exam and for Magnevist Exam Compared
Lesion Contrast Enhancement Between the Two Exams
Postdose Images for MultiHance Exam and for Magnevist Exam Compared
Lesion-to-brain Ratio (LBR) for Each Lesion - Reader 1
Predose and immediately postdose
Lesion-to-brain Ratio (LBR) for Each Lesion - Reader 2
Predose and immediately postdose
Lesion-to-brain Ratio (LBR) for Each Lesion - Reader 3
Predose and immediately postdose
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
MultiHance
ACTIVE COMPARATOR0.5 M MultiHance at a single injection
Magnevist
ACTIVE COMPARATOR0.5 M Magnevist at a single injection
Interventions
0.5 M Magnevist at a single dose injection
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Was 18 years or older
- Provided written informed consent
- Scheduled for MRI
- Confirmed or highly suspected to have brain tumor(s) and willing to undergo two MRI exams within 14 days
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant or lactating females
- Allergy to one or more of the ingredients in the products or hypersensitivity to any metals
- Congestive heart failure, class IV
- Previous stroke in the past year
- Received another contrast agent within 24 hours pre and post each exam
- Investigational product
- Contraindications to MRI
- Severe claustrophobia
- Surgery with 3 weeks prior
- Steroid therapy or radiosurgery between two exams
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Bracco Diagnostics, Inc.
Princeton, New Jersey, 08540, United States
Related Publications (1)
Rumboldt Z, Rowley HA, Steinberg F, Maldjian JA, Ruscalleda J, Gustafsson L, Bastianello S. Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, intra-individual crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine in MRI of brain tumors at 3 tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 Apr;29(4):760-7. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21695.
PMID: 19306364RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Gianpaolo Pirovano, MD, Executive Director, Head Corporate Medical Development
- Organization
- Bracco Diagnostics Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Gianpaolo Priovano, M.D.
Bracco Diagnostics, Inc
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 12, 2006
First Posted
November 6, 2006
Study Start
November 1, 2006
Primary Completion
February 1, 2008
Study Completion
March 1, 2008
Last Updated
November 5, 2020
Results First Posted
July 31, 2009
Record last verified: 2015-03