XP13512 vs. Placebo in Patients With Restless Legs Syndrome.
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of XP13512 in Patients With Restless Legs Syndrome.
2 other identifiers
interventional
325
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this trial is to assess the efficacy of XP13512 taken once daily compared to placebo for the treatment of patients suffering from Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Aug 2006
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 15, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 17, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2007
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 11, 2011
CompletedJuly 22, 2013
May 1, 2011
1.3 years
August 15, 2006
April 21, 2011
July 15, 2013
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change From Baseline in IRLS Rating Scale Total Score at Week 12 Using Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
The International Restless Legs Syndrome (IRLS) Rating scale is a measure of RLS disease severity. The scale reflects the participant-reported assessment of primary sensory and motor features and associated sleep problems in RLS. Ten items (individually scored from 0 to 4) are included that assess the impact of symptoms on participants' mood, daily life, and activities. The total scale score is a sum of all of the individual item scores and ranges from 0-40 points, with 40 being the most severe. The scale assesses symptoms over the week prior to measurement.
Baseline and Week 12
Number of Participants With a Score of "Much Improved" or "Very Much Improved" on the Investigator-rated CGI-I Scale (Response) at (Week 12) Using LOCF
The investigator -rated Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) scale is an assessment designed to allow investigators to rate the change of a participant's disease severity over time based on a seven-point scale, with a score of 1 being "very much improved," a score of 2 being "much improved," a score of 3 being "minimally improved," a score of 4 being "no change," a score of 5 being "minimally improved,"a score of 6 being "much worse," and a score of 7 being "very much worse." Participants with a response of "much improved" or "very much improved" were classified as responders.
Week 12
Secondary Outcomes (25)
Change From Baseline to the End of Treatment (Week 12) in the IRLS Rating Scale Total Score Using LOCF
Baseline (Day 1) and End of Treatment (Week 12)
Number of Participants Classsified as Responders on the Investigator-rated CGI-I Scale at Week 12 Using LOCF
Week 12
Number of Participants Who Had an Onset of Response to Treatment at the End of Week 1 Based Upon the IRLS Rating Scale Total Score and the Investigator-rated CGI-I Using LOCF
End of Week 1
The Time to Onset of the First Response to Treatment on the IRLS Rating Scale Total Score and the Investigator-rated CGI-I
Baseline (Day 1) to End of Treatment (Week 12)
Mean Change in the IRLS Rating Scale Total Score From Baseline at Week 12 by RLS Treatment History Using LOCF
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
- +20 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
XP13512 600MG
EXPERIMENTALXP13512 600MG ONCE DAILY
XP13512 1200MG
EXPERIMENTALXP13512 1200MG ONCE DAILY
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORPLACEBO ONCE DAILY
Interventions
XP13512 600MG ONCE DAILY
XP13512 1200MG ONCE DAILY
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with primary RLS, based on the International RLS Study Diagnostic Criteria.
You may not qualify if:
- A sleep disorder (e.g., sleep apnea) that may significantly affect the assessment of RLS;
- Neurologic disease or movement disorder (e.g., diabetic neuropathy, Parkinson's Disease, Multiple Sclerosis, dyskinesias, and dystonias);
- Abnormal laboratory results, electrocardiogram (ECG) or physical findings;
- Pregnant or lactating women;
- Women of childbearing potential who are not practicing an acceptable method of birth control.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- XenoPort, Inc.lead
Related Publications (5)
Ahmed M, Hays R, Steven Poceta J, Jaros MJ, Kim R, Shang G. Effect of Gabapentin Enacarbil on Individual Items of the International Restless Legs Study Group Rating Scale and Post-sleep Questionnaire in Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Primary Restless Legs Syndrome: Pooled Analysis of 3 Randomized Trials. Clin Ther. 2016 Jul;38(7):1726-1737.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.05.008. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
PMID: 27288210DERIVEDAvidan AY, Lee D, Park M, Jaros MJ, Shang G, Kim R. The Effect of Gabapentin Enacarbil on Quality of Life and Mood Outcomes in a Pooled Population of Adult Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Primary Restless Legs Syndrome. CNS Drugs. 2016 Apr;30(4):305-16. doi: 10.1007/s40263-016-0329-4.
PMID: 27067343DERIVEDOndo WG, Hermanowicz N, Borreguero DG, Jaros MJ, Kim R, Shang G. Effect of prior exposure to dopamine agonists on treatment with gabapentin enacarbil in adults with moderate-to-severe primary restless legs syndrome: pooled analyses from 3 randomized trials. J Clin Mov Disord. 2015 Mar 30;2:9. doi: 10.1186/s40734-015-0018-3. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 26788345DERIVEDLee DO, Ziman RB, Perkins AT, Poceta JS, Walters AS, Barrett RW; XP053 Study Group. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the efficacy and tolerability of gabapentin enacarbil in subjects with restless legs syndrome. J Clin Sleep Med. 2011 Jun 15;7(3):282-92. doi: 10.5664/JCSM.1074.
PMID: 21677899DERIVEDCanafax DM, Bhanegaonkar A, Bharmal M, Calloway M. Validation of the post sleep questionnaire for assessing subjects with restless legs syndrome: results from two double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled clinical trials. BMC Neurol. 2011 Apr 28;11:48. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-11-48.
PMID: 21527006DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- XenoPort Call Center
- Organization
- XenoPort, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
GSK Clinical Trials
GlaxoSmithKline
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 15, 2006
First Posted
August 17, 2006
Study Start
August 1, 2006
Primary Completion
December 1, 2007
Study Completion
December 1, 2007
Last Updated
July 22, 2013
Results First Posted
May 11, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-05