NCT00356057

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of biventricular pacing over conventional right ventricular pacing in patients with persistent or permanent, symptomatic atrial fibrillation undergoing atrioventricular (AV) node ablation and permanent pacing therapy.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
153

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable atrial-fibrillation

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2004

Typical duration for not_applicable atrial-fibrillation

Geographic Reach
1 country

10 active sites

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2004

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 21, 2006

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 25, 2006

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2008

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2008

Completed
3.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

July 8, 2011

Completed
Last Updated

February 27, 2018

Status Verified

January 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

3.4 years

First QC Date

July 21, 2006

Results QC Date

December 2, 2008

Last Update Submit

January 29, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

atrial fibrillationAV node ablationpacemakercongestive heart failure

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Average Percentage Improvement From Baseline of the 6-minute Walk Test Distance and Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Quality of Life Score at 6-months

    Combined, average percentage improvement in 6-minute walk test distance and Minnessota Living With Heart Failure Quality of Life score from baseline to 6-month follow-up for the Protos DR/CLS (Group 1) and Stratos LV (Group 2) compared with the active control (Group 3). The 6-minute walk test is a test that measure how far a patient can walk in 6 minutes in a standardized walking course. Percent Change (0% (worst)-100% (best))

    Change from baseline to six months post-procedure

  • Number of Participants Free of System-related Complications (Related to the Device, Leads, or Implant Procedure) at 6 Months Post-procedure

    Complication-free rate was evaluated in an equivalence (non-inferiority) format compared to a target of 85% minus delta (10%), where delta is the clinically significant difference for establishing equivalence. This endpoint evaluated system-related complications.

    At six months post-procedure

  • Number of Participants Free of System-related Complications (Related to the Device, Leads, or Implant Procedure) at 6 Months Post-procedure

    Complication-free rate was evaluated in an equivalence (non-inferiority) format compared to a target of 85% minus delta (10%), where delta is the clinically significant difference for establishing equivalence. This endpoint evaluated system-related complications. All Stratos systems (in both the biV and RV pacing arms) were evaluated together as pre-specified in the protocol.

    At six months post-procedure

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Change in Six-minute Walk Test

    Change from baseline to 6 months post-procedure

  • Change in Quality Of Life (QOL) Score Over 6 Months Calculated as QOL Score at Baseline - QOL Score at 6 Months

    Change from baseline to six months post-procedure

  • Cardiac Remodeling Assessments by Echocardiography - Change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

    Change from baseline to six months post-procedure

  • Changes in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification

    Change from baseline to six months post-procedure

  • Percentage of Patients With Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) Related Hospitalizations

    At six months post-procedure

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

1

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Biventricular pacing group with Closed Loop Stimulation rate adaptation (Protos CLS device)

Device: Protos DR/CLS and Stratos LV CRT pacemakers

2

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Biventricular pacing group with accelerometer based rate adaption (Stratos LV device)

Device: Protos DR/CLS and Stratos LV CRT pacemakers

3

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Right Ventricular pacing group with accelerometer based rate adaption (Stratos LV device)

Device: Protos DR/CLS and Stratos LV CRT pacemakers

Interventions

Protos DR/CLS is a dual chamber pacemaker with CLS rate adaption, Stratos LV is a biventricular pacemaker with accelerometer based rate adaption

Also known as: Protos DR/CLS dual chamber pacemaker
123

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Meet the indications for therapy
  • Persistent, symptomatic AF with poorly controlled rapid ventricular rates or permanent, symptomatic AF with poorly controlled rapid ventricular rates.
  • Eligible for AV nodal ablation and permanent pacemaker implantation
  • NYHA Class II or III heart failure
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Understand the nature of the procedure
  • Ability to tolerate the surgical procedure required for implantation
  • Give informed consent
  • Able to complete all testing required by the clinical protocol
  • Available for follow-up visits on a regular basis at the investigational site

You may not qualify if:

  • Meet one or more of the contraindications
  • Have a life expectancy of less than six months
  • Expected to receive heart transplantation within six months
  • Enrolled in another cardiovascular or pharmacological clinical investigation
  • Patients with an ICD, or being considered for an ICD
  • Patients with previously implanted biventricular pacing systems
  • Patients with previously implanted single or dual chamber pacing system with \> 50% documented ventricular pacing
  • Patients with previous AV node ablation
  • Six-minute walk test distance greater than 450 meters
  • Any condition preventing the patient from being able to perform required testing
  • Presence of another life-threatening, underlying illness separate from their cardiac disorder
  • Conditions that prohibit placement of any of the lead systems

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (10)

University of Alabama

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Location

Lake Charles Memorial

Lake Charles, Louisiana, United States

Location

Caritas St. Elizabeth's Medical Center

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Location

St. Joseph Mercy

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Location

McLaren Heart Foundation

Lapeer, Michigan, United States

Location

NYU Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Location

Aultman Hospital

Canton, Ohio, United States

Location

Ohio State University

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Location

Spartanburg Regional

Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States

Location

Lone Star Arrhythmia

Amarillo, Texas, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Atrial FibrillationHeart Failure

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Arrhythmias, CardiacHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Limitations and Caveats

Early termination due lack of enrollment.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Katerina de Metz, Director Clinical Studies
Organization
BIOTRONIK, Inc.

Study Officials

  • Michael Orlov, MD

    Caritas Elizabeth, Boston, MA

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 21, 2006

First Posted

July 25, 2006

Study Start

December 1, 2004

Primary Completion

May 1, 2008

Study Completion

June 1, 2008

Last Updated

February 27, 2018

Results First Posted

July 8, 2011

Record last verified: 2018-01

Locations