Atrial Fibrillation Rate Control Therapy Guided By Continuous Ambulatory Monitoring
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that the use of a continuous ambulatory monitoring device will reduce both the time to effective rate control and the health care expenditures associated with standard methods of rate control monitoring in patients presenting with atrial fibrillation with a rapid heart rate.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Apr 2005
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable atrial-fibrillation
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 26, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 27, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2006
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2006
CompletedApril 5, 2017
April 1, 2017
1.4 years
June 26, 2005
April 4, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time to adequate heart rate (HR) control, defined as resting heart rate ≤ 80 bpm and average heart rate over 24 hours < 100 and no recorded HR > 110% of maximum age-adjusted predicted HR.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Total health care costs associated with conventional and Cardionet based monitoring strategy.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Atrial fibrillation with resting ventricular rate \> 100 with rate control strategy indicated
- Atrial fibrillation is likely to be recurrent or persistent in the clinical judgment of the physician
- Patient able to be managed out of the hospital
- Ability to sign informed consent
- Ability to wear electrodes for the Cardionet device
- Patient willing to have home patient educator install Cardionet monitor in their home
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to follow up with prescribed schedule of monitoring
- Concomitant use of antiarrhythmic drug
- Indication for hospitalization
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centerlead
- Cardionetcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Peter Zimetbaum, MD
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Professor of Medicine in the Field of Cardiovascular Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 26, 2005
First Posted
June 27, 2005
Study Start
April 1, 2005
Primary Completion
September 1, 2006
Study Completion
September 1, 2006
Last Updated
April 5, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-04