Laser Iridotomy Versus Phacoemulsification in Acute Angle Closure
Angle Closure: Laser Iridotomy Versus Phacoemulsification Study (ACLIPS)- A Study of Acute Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma Comparing Two Treatment Modalities: Laser Peripheral vs Phacoemulsification With Posterior Intraocular Lens Implant
2 other identifiers
interventional
70
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a randomised controlled clinical trial to compare laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) and primary phacoemulsification with intra-ocular lens implantation (phaco/IOL) in the treatment of acute primary angle-closure glaucoma (APACG). Following successful medical lowering of raised intra-ocular pressure (IOP) and control of intraocular inflammation, patients presenting to Singapore National Eye Centre and Singapore General Hospital with acute primary angle-closure glaucoma who meet the eligibility are randomised to one of the two treatment arms: laser peripheral iridotomy and primary phacoemulsification with intra-ocular lens implantation. These patients will be monitored closely for 2 years post-operatively.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2001
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2001
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 7, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 10, 2006
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2007
CompletedOctober 24, 2006
October 1, 2004
July 7, 2006
October 23, 2006
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Recurrence of APACG: Patients who develop a recurrence of symptoms of APACG. Treatment of recurrence will be decided by the ophthalmologist managing the patient.
IOP lowering medication is required.
Further glaucoma surgery is required.
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Cataract surgery is required. Patients in the LPI group who develop significant progression of cataract during the follow-up period will be offered cataract extraction.
No light perception
Eyes become phthisical
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- APACG. In cases where both eyes are eligible, the right eye will be entered.
- IOP less than or equal to 30 mmHg within 24 hours of presentation and after initiation of medical treatment
- Significant cataract with best corrected visual acuity equal or less than 6/15
- Informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Secondary causes of angle-closure e.g. subluxed lens, uveitis, trauma and neovascular glaucoma
- Intumescent cataract (phacomorphic glaucoma)
- Eyes with anterior chamber depth differing by more than 0.3 mm
- Eyes with no cataract
- Active ocular infection in either eye which would prevent surgery
- Female subjects who are pregnant, nursing or of childbearing potential and not using adequate contraception
- Participating in another study
- Previous intraocular eye surgery on the affected eye.
- Any medical condition which would be a contra-indication to surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Singapore National Eye Centre
Singapore, 168751, Singapore
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Steve Seah, FRCS (Ed)
Singapore National Eye Centre
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 7, 2006
First Posted
July 10, 2006
Study Start
October 1, 2001
Study Completion
October 1, 2007
Last Updated
October 24, 2006
Record last verified: 2004-10