Reducing Snack Variety in Weight Loss Treatment
Reducing Snack Food Variety During Obesity Treatment
1 other identifier
interventional
202
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The rising prevalence of obesity in the United States is believed to be due to increased exposure to adverse environmental factors, such as food portion sizes and increased dietary variety. Although decreasing portion sizes is a strategy used in weight loss programs, research has not studied the effects of decreasing dietary variety. Cross-sectional studies show a positive association between variety and body weight and in our own studies the investigators have shown that greater reductions in the number of different snack foods (i.e., cookies, chips) consumed predicted greater decreases in overall caloric and fat intake and greater weight loss. Limiting variety may reduce intake through long-term sensory-specific satiety and/or monotony. Reducing dietary variety is a novel dietary approach with the potential to improve long-term weight loss, which has not been studied as a clinical strategy in obesity research. The objective of this application is to conduct a randomized controlled trial of a behavioral weight loss intervention limiting the number of different snack foods consumed. Two hundred overweight and obese participants will be randomized to a standard behavioral intervention (Standard) or to a standard behavioral intervention that also limits the number of different snack foods consumed (Limited Variety). Both conditions will receive an 18-month standard behavioral intervention, using behavioral techniques (i.e., self-monitoring) to change eating behaviors. Participants in the Limited Variety condition will also limit variety in snack foods to only two chosen snack foods throughout the intervention. Measures of weight, snack food consumption and hedonics, and diet satisfaction will be taken at 0, 6, 12, and 18 months. This investigation will determine:
- 1.if the Limited Variety condition produces greater weight loss than the Standard condition at 18 months;
- 2.if the Limited Variety condition consumes fewer servings and calories from snack foods than the Standard condition;
- 3.if limiting snack food variety produces long-term sensory-specific satiety and/or monotony.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable obesity
Started Jul 2006
Longer than P75 for not_applicable obesity
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 19, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 22, 2006
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2010
CompletedApril 20, 2012
October 1, 2008
4.3 years
May 19, 2006
April 19, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Weight loss
18 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Diet
18 months
Hedonics of food
18 months
Study Arms (2)
1
EXPERIMENTALBehavioral: Behavioral weight loss (Standard)
2
EXPERIMENTALBehavioral: Behavioral weight loss (Limited Variety)
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age between 21 and 65 years. Older adults may have more medical co-morbidities, requiring greater medical supervision. Although pediatric obesity is a significant concern, this group has different nutritional needs and requires different levels of therapist and parental involvement than are proposed.
- Body mass index (BMI) between 27 and 45 kg/m2. Based upon the Evidence Report (72), weight loss is recommended for individuals with a BMI \> 25. A BMI of \> 27 was chosen as eligibility criteria for this investigation because this level of BMI will allow for a 10% weight loss to occur prior to reaching a BMI of \< 25. Individuals with a BMI of \> 45 have more medical co-morbidities and require greater medical supervision, and thus will be considered ineligible for this investigation.
You may not qualify if:
- Report a heart condition, chest pain during periods of activity or rest, or loss of consciousness on the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q) (73). Individuals endorsing joint problems, prescription medication usage, or other medical conditions that could limit exercise will be required to obtain written physician consent to participate.
- Have an allergy to a food commonly found in snack foods (i.e., nuts, milk and egg proteins).
- Report major psychiatric diseases or organic brain syndromes.
- Are currently participating in a weight loss program and/or taking weight loss medication or lost \> 5% of body weight during the past 6 months.
- Intend to move outside of the metropolitan area within the time frame of the investigation.
- Are pregnant, lactating, less than 6 months post-partum, or plan to become pregnant during the time frame of the investigation.
- Consume \< 5 different types of snack food per week. Pilot data indicated that upon screening 44 participants, mean weekly variety of snack foods was 8.7 (range 2 to 14, with only two participants consuming \< 5 snack foods per week).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- The Miriam Hospitallead
- National Institutes of Health (NIH)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
The Miriam Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, 02903, United States
Related Publications (1)
Raynor HA, Van Walleghen EL, Bachman JL, Looney SM, Phelan S, Wing RR. Dietary energy density and successful weight loss maintenance. Eat Behav. 2011 Apr;12(2):119-25. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2011.01.008. Epub 2011 Jan 25.
PMID: 21385641DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hollie Raynor, PhD
University of Tennessee
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 19, 2006
First Posted
May 22, 2006
Study Start
July 1, 2006
Primary Completion
October 1, 2010
Study Completion
October 1, 2010
Last Updated
April 20, 2012
Record last verified: 2008-10