Fluid Shifts During Resuscitation: Impacts on Macrocirculation and Microcirculation
1 other identifier
observational
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Fluid resuscitation in burn patients is associated with major macrocirculatory and microcirculatory disturbances that have been poorly described. When done according to expert opinions, it is now rare to encounter the death of a patient due to an inadequate fluid resuscitation. Fluid resuscitation in burn patients is more opinion-based than evidence-based. Although burn admission to an intensive care facility is relatively rare, the burn patient is well suited to answer questions in the fluid resuscitation field because, as opposed to other critically ill patients:
- 1.investigators do have a time 'zero' for burn patients; they know exactly when the insult occurred;
- 2.apart from fluid resuscitation, the management of burn patients is uniform in the investigators' unit and is done according to various protocols;
- 3.the burn population is more uniform than the septic population making confounders and background noises less likely; and
- 4.as basic as it might sound, studying fluid resuscitation implies accomplishing a significant one; burn patients are the category of critically ill patients receiving the most important fluid resuscitation.
- 5.fluid accumulation during the initial phase; and
- 6.short term effects of colloids on macrocirculatory and microcirculatory parameters.
- 7.At defined time points: a set of data (see below) will be collected by the research team at baseline, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours after burn injury. Baseline values will be the ones obtained immediately after consent.
- 8.Fluid challenges: Burn patients often require additional fluid bolus to maintain hemodynamic stability because of the following reasons: hypotension; decreased urine output (less than 0.5 ml/kg/hour); uncorrected metabolic acidosis; rhabdomyolysis; increasing hematocrit; or any other clinical reason according to the attending physician.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 15, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 17, 2006
CompletedJune 16, 2006
May 1, 2006
May 15, 2006
June 15, 2006
Conditions
Keywords
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Major thermal, electrical, or chemical burns
- Admission to the burn unit within 6 hours after burn
- Burned surface area over 20% or equivalent
- Signed consent by the patient or relative
- Commitment to full maximal support
You may not qualify if:
- Patient under 18 years old
- Patient over 80 years old
- Pregnancy
- Chronic renal failure requiring dialysis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Montreal Burn Centrelead
- Bristol-Myers Squibbcollaborator
- Canadian Anesthesiologists' Societycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal
Montreal, Quebec, H2W1T8, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David Bracco, MD
Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marc-Jacques Dubois, MD
Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- DEFINED POPULATION
- Time Perspective
- OTHER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 15, 2006
First Posted
May 17, 2006
Study Start
May 1, 2006
Last Updated
June 16, 2006
Record last verified: 2006-05