Randomized Controlled Trial of Ultrasound Guided Needle Placement Versus Nerve Stimulation for Coracoid Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block

NCT00326261 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: 03-0126-AE
• Study Type: observational
• Target: N/A
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

Nerve blocks for arm and hand surgery provide many advantages for patients including excellent pain control and reduction in general anesthesia-related adverse effects. Infraclavicular block is possibly the best method for performing regional anesthesia of the arm because of the consistent anesthesia of the whole arm and low incidence of serious adverse effects. Normally the anesthetist uses nerve stimulation to identify nerves supplying the forearm and hand. Recent research has indicated that to improve success from 60% to 79% two types of muscle stimulation must be sought before injection of local anesthetic. This can be time consuming, requires a significant learning process, increases complications and leaves 21% of patients with inadequate anesthesia requiring supplementation or general anesthesia. More recently practitioners have been using ultrasound imaging to direct the needle and watch local anesthetic spread around the nerves. Preliminary reports have documented that this technique is associated with much greater success than the nerve stimulation method. However a good quality study comparing the dual-endpoint infraclavicular technique with an ultrasound-guided technique has not been performed. This randomized study aims to rectify this deficiency by determining if ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block has a significantly greater success than the current standard, dual end-endpoint nerve stimulation technique.

Conditions

Patients Undergoing Hand Surgery

Interventions

Ultrasound compared to dual-endpoint nerve stimulator guided approach. PROCEDURE

Ultrasound PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years - 80 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

• Patients undergoing elective upper limb surgery at or below the elbow.
• Patients aged \> 18 and \< 80 years.
• ASA I-III.
• BMI \< 35.

You may not qualify if:

• Inability to read, write or speak English. (This is necessary because subjects will have to follow detailed instructions to allow testing of motor and sensory function. it is not feasible to have an interpreter present in the block room during performance of these procedures).
• Contraindication to brachial plexus block.
• Existing neurological deficit in the area to be blocked.
• Known loco-regional malignancy or infection.
• Coagulopathy.
• Allergy to local anesthetic agents.
• Chest or shoulder deformities.
• Severe respiratory disease.
• Healed but dislocated clavicle fracture.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• University Health Network, Toronto: lead
• The Physicians' Services Incorporated Foundation: collaborator
• Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society: collaborator

Study Sites (1)

University Health Network, Toronto Western Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2S8, Canada

Location

Related Publications (1)

• Brull R, Lupu M, Perlas A, Chan VW, McCartney CJ. Compared with dual nerve stimulation, ultrasound guidance shortens the time for infraclavicular block performance. Can J Anaesth. 2009 Nov;56(11):812-8. doi: 10.1007/s12630-009-9170-2.

  PMID: 19728002 DERIVED

MeSH Terms

Interventions

High-Energy Shock Waves

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Ultrasonic Waves; Sound; Radiation, Nonionizing; Radiation; Physical Phenomena

Study Officials

• Colin JL McCartney, MBChB FRCA FCARCSI FRCPC

  University Health Network, Toronto Western Hospital

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

• Study Type: observational
• Time Perspective: PROSPECTIVE
• Sponsor Type: OTHER

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: May 12, 2006
• First Posted: May 16, 2006
• Last Updated: December 18, 2008

Record last verified: 2006-04

Locations

CA (1)