Cisplatin Induction With Paclitaxel Consolidation for Stage III-IV Epithelial Ovarian and Primary Peritoneal Cancer
Cisplatin Induction Followed by Paclitaxel Consolidation for the Treatment of Stage III and IV Epithelial Ovarian Cancer and Primary Peritoneal Cancer With In Vitro Correlates of Response
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Clinically, there has been extensive experience with topotecan and cisplatin. Recently, several investigators have evaluated the combination of paclitaxel, cisplatin and topotecan. As expected, myelosuppression was the dose-limiting factor. Herben et al recently reported the results of a phase I trial using the combination of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and topotecan as first line therapy in advanced stage ovarian cancer. Interestingly, the authors could not achieve a dose of topotecan that would be considered "optimal" for the treatment of relapsed disease in a single-agent fashion. The inability to utilize a therapeutic dose when combined with either platinum or paclitaxel has been demonstrated in previous reports and affirms the bone marrow suppressive effect. The clinical response rate from this trial was reported as 86.7%.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Sep 2005
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 12, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 14, 2006
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2007
CompletedDecember 8, 2016
December 1, 2007
April 12, 2006
December 6, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Recurrence-Free Interval
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Examine the toxicity of therapy and to develop suitable strategies for dose modification.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- John P. Fruehauflead
- GlaxoSmithKlinecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
Orange, California, 92868, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
John P Fruehauf, MD, PhD
Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr. John P. Fruehauf
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 12, 2006
First Posted
April 14, 2006
Study Start
September 1, 2005
Study Completion
April 1, 2007
Last Updated
December 8, 2016
Record last verified: 2007-12