Comparing Intravenous and Oral Paracetamol for Cholecystectomy
Comparative Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous and Oral Paracetamol in the Peri-Operative Period of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To determine the amount of paracetamol in the blood when given in either intravenous or oral forms prior to cholecystectomy. The clinical effectiveness of each form will also be evaluated with pain scores and the use of other pain relief drugs.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Oct 2005
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 13, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 15, 2006
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2006
CompletedMarch 9, 2007
February 1, 2006
February 13, 2006
March 8, 2007
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Early pharmacokinetics (0-240 minutes) of a single dose of 1g paracetamol in IV and oral formulations
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Difference in analgesia achieved (15-120 minutes post-operative) with IV and oral paracetamol.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Males and females aged 18-75
- Scheduled to have elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia
You may not qualify if:
- Inadequate English comprehension (difficult to obtain informed consent and cooperation), and when interpreters are not available.
- History of allergy or sensitivity to paracetamol
- Administration of oral paracetamol within previous 8 hours
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade IV or V, indicating serious cardio-respiratory co-morbidity
- Not suitable for protocol anaesthetic technique (eg: history of nausea and vomiting with morphine)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Melbourne Healthlead
Study Sites (1)
Royal Melbourne Hospital
Melbourne, Victoria, 3052, Australia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Malcolm Hogg, Anaesthetist
Melbourne Health
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 13, 2006
First Posted
February 15, 2006
Study Start
October 1, 2005
Study Completion
October 1, 2006
Last Updated
March 9, 2007
Record last verified: 2006-02