NCT00257725

Brief Summary

This study will evaluate if Ritalin LA™ is safe and effective for ADHD treatment in 4-to-5-year olds.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
11

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2005

Typical duration for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2005

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 21, 2005

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 23, 2005

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2008

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2008

Completed
12.5 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 26, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

August 26, 2020

Status Verified

August 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

November 21, 2005

Results QC Date

December 17, 2012

Last Update Submit

August 14, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

ADHDAttention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham Questionnaire (SNAP-IV)

    The SNAP-IV Rating Scale is a revision of the Swanson, Nolan and Pelham (SNAP) Questionnaire (Swanson et al, 1983). The SNAP-IV is based on a 0 to 3 rating scale: Not at All = 0, Just A Little = 1, Quite A Bit = 2, and Very Much = 3. Subscale scores on the SNAP-IV are calculated by summing the scores on the items in the subset and dividing by the number of items in the subset. The score for any subset is expressed as the Average Rating-Per-Item, as shown for ratings on the ADHD-Inattentive (ADHD-I) subset. Sub scale ranges from 0-3. Higher scores mean better outcome. Change score from baseline is reported.

    week 5

  • Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S)

    CGI-S is designed to assess severity of illness on a seven-point scale: 1 = normal (not at ll ill) to 7 = among the most extremely ill patients. Range: 0-7, higher score means worse outcome. Change from baseline is reported.

    week 5

  • Children's Global Assessment Scale (C-GAS)

    Children's Global Assessment Scale (C-GAS) is designed to assess overall functioning across settings. The scale is rated from 1 to 100, with lower scores reflecting poorer adjustment. Change from baseline is reported.

    week 5

Study Arms (1)

ADHD Treatment Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Single-arm, open-label, once-daily-dosing of long-duration beaded MPH (B-MPH) at 10-30 mg (flexible titration) in 4-to-5 year old children with ADHD.

Drug: B-MPH

Interventions

B-MPHDRUG

Dosage form is a 20 mg capsule to be given once daily in the morning for 30 days

Also known as: Ritalin LA
ADHD Treatment Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age4 Years - 5 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Parents/guardians and children must speak English and/or Spanish; parents/guardians must sign consent form; children must verbally assent.
  • Boys and girls from 4-5 years old (inclusive) at screening.
  • Children who meet the DSM-IV criteria for a primary diagnosis of ADHD (combined or hyperactive subtype), with symptoms present for at least 9 months.
  • Children who demonstrate adequate need for treatment due to ADHD symptom-severity and clinical impairment.
  • Children with IQ of at least 70 confirmed by valid IQ test.
  • Children who are in educational settings (pre-school, kindergarten, or elementary school program) with at least 8 same-age peers for at least two half days weekly.
  • Parents and children who can attend weekly study visits.
  • Children who are naïve to ADHD medications; received ADHD medications in the past but are not currently treated; or on ADHD medications but finding them inconvenient (due to short duration of action) or not very helpful

You may not qualify if:

  • Children and parents/guardians who do not understand or cannot follow necessary instructions; children and parents who are unwilling to comply with study procedures or cooperate with child psychiatrist.
  • Children taking excluded medications.
  • Children with history of intolerance to MPH/stimulant medications or no response to adequate stimulant trials.
  • Children with current adjustment disorder, autism, psychosis, bipolar disorder, significant suicidality, or other psychiatric disorders.
  • Children with history of physical, sexual, or emotional abuse, which lead to a significant impact on the clinical presentation and potentially some ADHD symptoms.
  • Children with screening abnormalities deemed clinically significant by child psychiatrist.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

New York State Psychiatric Insitute

New York, New York, 10032, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Maayan L, Paykina N, Fried J, Strauss T, Gugga SS, Greenhill L. The open-label treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in 4- and 5-year-old children with beaded methylphenidate. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2009 Apr;19(2):147-53. doi: 10.1089/cap.2008.053.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity

Interventions

Methylphenidate

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior DisordersNeurodevelopmental DisordersMental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PhenylacetatesAcids, CarbocyclicCarboxylic AcidsOrganic ChemicalsPiperidinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic Compounds

Limitations and Caveats

The conclusions of this study are limited by its small size, the open-label design, and the possible confound of the parent training intervention.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Laurence Greenhill, MD
Organization
New York State Psychiatric Institute

Study Officials

  • Laurence L Greenhill, MD

    New York State Psychiatric Insitute

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Research Psychiatrist 2

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 21, 2005

First Posted

November 23, 2005

Study Start

March 1, 2005

Primary Completion

March 1, 2008

Study Completion

March 1, 2008

Last Updated

August 26, 2020

Results First Posted

August 26, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-08

Locations