Efficacy of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate for Promoting Occupational Success in Young Adults With ADHD
1 other identifier
interventional
22
1 country
1
Brief Summary
There has been little research on the third area of impairment noted in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - "occupational functioning." Individuals with ADHD experience job-related impairments including a greater likelihood of being unemployed and not enrolled in school and for those that were employed they were in a lower status occupation, relative to typically-developing comparison peers. The current literature on analogue workplace settings and the effects of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate includes office-based tasks similar to school seat work. Unfortunately, this is inconsistent with the typical work environment most common for individuals with disabilities such as ADHD where food preparation is the most common job following high school. Therefore, medication effects in this type of setting, most common for individuals with ADHD entering the workforce, need to be studied. The investigators propose to study workplace behavior in an analogue work setting in a laboratory "pizza place." Individuals with ADHD will participate in an interview with a supervisor each day, have a list of deliveries that need to be managed, deal with situations that require occupational judgment and appropriate customer service, and drive to make deliveries accurately and on-time. These behaviors can be reliably assessed within the laboratory. Twenty young adults will participate in two "workdays" within a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design wherein participants will be administered placebo and .3 mg/kg lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in a counter-balanced order.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Apr 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 31, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 27, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 11, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 30, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 24, 2021
CompletedJune 24, 2021
June 1, 2021
11 months
August 31, 2017
September 23, 2020
June 2, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Ratings of Job Application Quality
Three independent coders will review each de-identified application. Following the review of the application, coders will complete a rating form that asks them to make an overall evaluation regarding whether the person was an acceptable job candidate for an interview using a scale of 1 ("definitely not") to 5 ("definitely"). Average rating across coders will be used as the dependent measure.
during interventional study session, 1 day in duration
Ratings of Job Interview Performance
Three coders who are unaware of the study participant identities or group status will view the job interview videotape and completed a form. Raters will provide a rating of their overall impression of the interview behavior ranging from a score of one (Poor) to four (Outstanding). The average score of the coders will be utilized as a dependent measure.
during interventional study session, 1 day in duration
Objective Observation of Workplace Productivity
The dependent measures from this aspect of the study are the number of items completed correctly out of the total number of assigned items (i.e., 225). Thus, the score reflects the percentage of items correctly completed out of the 225 assigned and scores could range from 0-100.
during interventional study session, 1 day in duration
Inattentive/Overactive Rating
In addition to ratings of the interview performance, the rater also will complete the five-item inattentive/overactive (I/O) factor of the Iowa Conners rating scale (Atkins, Pelham, \& Licht, 1989; Loney \& Milich, 1982; Pelham, Milich, Murphy, \& Murphy, 1989). The five items are rated on a scale of Not at all (0) to Very Much (3) and the sum of these items represents the score. The dependent measure will be the score averaged across raters. Scores can range from 0-3 on each item, and the average score of the 5 items was used. Higher scores reflect greater inattentive/overactivity-related behaviors.
during interventional study session, 1 day in duration
Study Arms (2)
Lab visit 1
EXPERIMENTAL40 mg of Vyvanse administered q.a.m. or Placebo administered in random, counter-balanced fashion.
Lab visit 2
EXPERIMENTAL40 mg of Vyvanse administered q.a.m. or Placebo administered in random, counter-balanced fashion.
Interventions
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate 40 MG administered orally
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- diagnosis of ADHD
- parental permission and/or teen consent/assent as appropriate
- between 16-25 years of age
- IQ greater than or equal to 70
- permit or license to drive
- ability to read and understand English
You may not qualify if:
- any medical condition that would contraindicate use of stimulant medication
- any prior adverse response to lisdexamfetamine dimesylate or other stimulant medication
- use of concurrent,non-stimulant psychoactive medication
- diagnosis of schizophrenia or presence of thought disorder symptoms
- autism spectrum disorder
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Gregory Fabianolead
Study Sites (1)
SUNY at Buffalo
Buffalo, New York, 14214, United States
Related Publications (1)
Gordon CT, Fabiano GA, Hulme KF, Sodano SM, Adragna M, Lim R, Stanford S, Janikowski L, Bufalo B, Rodriguez Z, Swiatek D. Efficacy of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate for promoting occupational success in adolescents and young adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2021 Aug;29(4):308-318. doi: 10.1037/pha0000365. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
PMID: 32297783DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Gregory A. Fabiano, Ph.D.
- Organization
- Florida International University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 31, 2017
First Posted
February 27, 2018
Study Start
April 1, 2018
Primary Completion
February 11, 2019
Study Completion
August 30, 2019
Last Updated
June 24, 2021
Results First Posted
June 24, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share