Treatment With Namenda in Women at Risk for Cognitive Decline
Cognitive Effects of Memantine in Postmenopausal Women at Risk of Dementia: a Pilot Study
1 other identifier
interventional
22
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This research aims to explore the effectiveness of memantine (Namenda) in treating post-menopausal women between the ages of 50 and 65, who are at risk for cognitive decline. Memantine has already been shown to offer cognitive benefits to patients suffering from Alzheimer's disease, but it's potential for treating those at risk for cognitive decline without Alzheimer's disease or other dementia has yet to be evaluated. It is possible that memantine may offer neurocognitive benefits to this population, as well. Participants are asked to take medication for six months, complete neuropsychological testing, and one blood draw.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2004
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 19, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 20, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 17, 2017
CompletedJune 14, 2017
May 1, 2017
5.5 years
October 19, 2005
October 10, 2016
May 16, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in California Verbal Learning Test - Second Edition Proactive Interference Test Between Time 1 and Time 2
This tests verbal memory (word list). A list of words is presented and subjects are asked to recall as many as they can. Then a list of interference words is presented. Finally a recognition list of 44 words is presented where subjects are asked to distinguish between target words and distractors. The mean difference in the percentage of target words recalled between time 1 and time 2 is calculated below.
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change in Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (DKEFS) Verbal Fluency Category Switching Between Time 1 and Time 2
6 months
Study Arms (2)
ApoE Non-Carriers
EXPERIMENTALSubjects in this group did not carry the apolipoprotein E-epsilon 4 (apoE-e4) allele. During week 1 of the study, subjects were administered 5 mg of namenda once daily. During week 2 of the study, subjects were administered 5 mg of namenda in the morning and 5 mg in the evening (10 mg/day). During week 3 of the study, subjects were administered 10 mg in the morning and 5 mg in the evening (15 mg/day). During week 4 of the study, subjects were administered 10 mg in the morning and 10 mg in the evening (20 mg/day).
ApoE Carriers
EXPERIMENTALSubjects in this group carried the apolipoprotein E-epsilon 4 (apoE-e4) allele. During week 1 of the study, subjects were administered 5 mg of namenda once daily. During week 2 of the study, subjects were administered 5 mg of namenda in the morning and 5 mg in the evening (10 mg/day). During week 3 of the study, subjects were administered 10 mg in the morning and 5 mg in the evening (15 mg/day). During week 4 of the study, subjects were administered 10 mg in the morning and 10 mg in the evening (20 mg/day).
Interventions
Namenda has already been shown to offer cognitive benefits to patients suffering from Alzheimer's disease, but it's potential for treating those at risk for cognitive decline without Alzheimer's disease or other dementia has yet to be evaluated. It is possible that memantine may offer neurocognitive benefits to this population, as well. Participants are asked to take medication for six months, complete neuropsychological testing, and one blood draw.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women between the ages of 50-65
- Willing to sign Human Subjects Protection Consent Form
- Personal or family history of mood disorder
- Hypothyroidism
- Diabetes
You may not qualify if:
- History of cerebrovascular disease
- History of myocardial infarction within the previous year
- History of unstable heart disease
- Uncontrolled hypertension
- Less than 8 years of education
- English as a 2nd language
- Uncorrected vision or hearing deficits
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Stanford Universitylead
- Forest Laboratoriescollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Stanford University School of Medicine
Stanford, California, 94305, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Natalie Rasgon
- Organization
- Stanford University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dr Natalie Rasgon
Stanford University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 19, 2005
First Posted
October 20, 2005
Study Start
June 1, 2004
Primary Completion
December 1, 2009
Study Completion
December 1, 2009
Last Updated
June 14, 2017
Results First Posted
May 17, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share