NCT00224848

Brief Summary

This study addresses the challenges associated with implementation of clinical practice guidelines (CPG's) and is motivated by our interest in gaining insight regarding the following general research questions about CPG implementation: A. Can physician adherence to complex CPGs be promoted by use of a hand-held computerized decision support tool providing patient-specific recommendations, documentation, and drug dosing assistance? B. Will increased adherence to CPGs reduce variation in management by age, gender and race/ethnicity such that disparities in healthcare are reduced or eliminated? C. What are the cost implications of using PDA-based technology to promote CPG adherence? This randomized, controlled, unblinded, practice-based trial will address these research questions by testing the following hypotheses in a 2 year behavioral intervention period:

  1. 1.The absolute proportion of patients that is treated appropriately with respect to lipid-lowering drug therapy within 4 months after testing will be increased by a net of at least 9% by the intervention as measured in baseline and follow-up independent cross-sectional samples of eligible patients (primary endpoint).
  2. 2.The absolute proportion of patients that is treated to the appropriate low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal during follow-up of the baseline cohort of eligible patients is increased by a net of at least 12% by the intervention (secondary endpoint).
  3. 3.The proportions of eligible patients that are appropriately screened, risk-stratified, and counseled regarding therapeutic lifestyle changes are increased by the intervention (tertiary endpoints).
  4. 4.The intervention effect in subgroups defined by disease status (CVD, diabetes or neither), age, gender, and race/ethnicity reduces any disparities observed at baseline (exploratory analyses).
  5. 5.In addition, we will estimate the marginal cost effectiveness of the intervention for the primary endpoint.
  6. 6.The absolute proportion of patients that is treated appropriately with respect to blood pressure lowering drug therapy will be 10% greater in intervention practices than in comparison practices as measured in follow-up independent cross-sectional samples of eligible patients (primary endpoint).
  7. 7.The absolute proportion of patients that is treated to the appropriate blood pressure goal during follow-up will be 10% greater in the intervention practices (secondary endpoint).
  8. 8.The intervention effect in subgroups defined by disease status (CVD, diabetes or neither), age, gender, and race/ethnicity reduces any disparities observed at baseline (exploratory analyses).
  9. 9.In addition, we will estimate the marginal cost effectiveness of the intervention for the primary endpoint.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
61

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_2 cardiovascular-diseases

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2002

Longer than P75 for phase_2 cardiovascular-diseases

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2002

Completed
3.2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 21, 2005

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 23, 2005

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2007

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2008

Completed
Last Updated

November 7, 2016

Status Verified

August 1, 2008

Enrollment Period

5.2 years

First QC Date

September 21, 2005

Last Update Submit

November 4, 2016

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Proportion of patients treated appropriately with respect to lipid-lowering therapy within four months after lipid testing

    Measured at 2 years

  • Rate of appropriate treatment among patients with high blood pressure

    Measured at 2 years

Study Arms (2)

ATP III

EXPERIMENTAL

A novel practice-based intervention, based on the ATP III Clinical Practice Guideline, which includes the use of a personal digital assistant (PDA) based decision support tool.

Behavioral: Palm-Pilot Intervention

JNC 7

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

A novel practice-based intervention, based on the JNC-7 blood pressure Clinical Practice Guideline, which includes the use of am automated blood pressure measurement device.

Behavioral: Palm-Pilot Intervention

Interventions

Both groups received guideline dissemination, patient activation materials, continuing education (CE) and feedback based on baseline chart audit. The intervention included academic detailing (AD) and a hand-held computerized decision support tool that provided patient-specific, ATPIII-based risk stratification and treatment recommendations. CE sessions offered information relevant to ATPIII and JNC7 and focused on the evidence base. AD offerings focused on strategies to apply concepts to practice and were specific to the randomized arm. Investigators visited each practice at baseline to educate physicians about the guideline and evidence supporting prevention of CVD, and to provide training on use of the Palm tool. Visits were conducted as "lunch and learn" sessions. The tool was a modified version of NHLBI's PDA decision support program and indicates specific drug therapies and dosages needed to achieve cholesterol reduction and prints documentation. A user's manual was developed.

ATP IIIJNC 7

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years - 84 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may not qualify if:

  • Potentially eligible patients for the chart abstraction sample will be adults, ages 21 through 84 years, seen in the participating primary care practices during the baseline (July 1, 2001 - June 30, 2003) or follow-up (March 1, 2004 - February 28, 2006) periods. We are examining two-year periods to increase the proportion of patients that has been screened. We can include "year 0" (July 1, 2001 - June 30, 2002), because ATPIII was published in May 2001. Although the guidelines do not exclude persons older than 84 years, at present we propose to restrict the evaluation sample to the aforementioned age group, due to acknowledged controversies regarding the appropriate preventive strategies in the very old.
  • Primary Care Practices (Internal Medicine or Family Medicine) Within 3-hour driving radius of WFUSM At least 50% of practice's providers willing to participate in study Willingness to accept randomization assignment Willingness to participate in chart audit Have a computer suitable for connectivity with the PDAs for installation of software upgrades and for printing of patient-specific reports for medical record documentation purposes
  • Academic practices
  • Practicing healthcare provider affiliated with a primary care practice participating in GLAD Heart.
  • Willingness to participate
  • None
  • Potentially eligible patients for the chart abstraction sample will be adults, ages 21 through 84 years, seen in the participating primary care practices during the baseline (July 1, 2001 - June 30, 2003) or follow-up (March 1, 2004 - February 28, 2006) periods. We are examining two-year periods to increase the proportion of patients that has been screened. We can include "year 0" (July 1, 2001 - June 30, 2002), because ATPIII was published in May 2001. Although the guidelines do not exclude persons older than 84 years, at present we propose to restrict the evaluation sample to the aforementioned age group, due to acknowledged controversies regarding the appropriate preventive strategies in the very old.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (3)

  • Ellis SD, Bertoni AG, Bonds DE, Clinch CR, Balasubramanyam A, Blackwell C, Chen H, Lischke M, Goff DC Jr. Value of recruitment strategies used in a primary care practice-based trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2007 May;28(3):258-67. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2006.08.009. Epub 2006 Sep 1.

  • Bertoni AG, Bonds DE, Steffes S, Jackson E, Crago L, Balasubramanyam A, Chen H, Goff DC Jr. Quality of cholesterol screening and management with respect to the National Cholesterol Education's Third Adult Treatment Panel (ATPIII) guideline in primary care practices in North Carolina. Am Heart J. 2006 Oct;152(4):785-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.04.017.

  • Bertoni AG, Bonds DE, Chen H, Hogan P, Crago L, Rosenberger E, Barham AH, Clinch CR, Goff DC Jr. Impact of a multifaceted intervention on cholesterol management in primary care practices: guideline adherence for heart health randomized trial. Arch Intern Med. 2009 Apr 13;169(7):678-86. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.44.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cardiovascular DiseasesHypercholesterolemiaHypertension

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

HyperlipidemiasDyslipidemiasLipid Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesVascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • David C Goff, Jr, MD, PhD

    Wake Forest University Health Sciences

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
NIH

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 21, 2005

First Posted

September 23, 2005

Study Start

July 1, 2002

Primary Completion

September 1, 2007

Study Completion

August 1, 2008

Last Updated

November 7, 2016

Record last verified: 2008-08