Walking Aids in the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis
1 other identifier
interventional
53
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess whether the single point cane will relieve pain and disability in overweight or obese people with knee OA through altered joint biomechanics and what factors influence acceptance of cane use.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable obesity
Started Jul 2006
Typical duration for not_applicable obesity
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 13, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 22, 2005
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 22, 2014
CompletedNovember 1, 2017
September 1, 2017
2.2 years
September 13, 2005
September 24, 2013
September 29, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Peak Vertical Force on Affected Limb
An in-shoe dynamic, pressure distribution system (Pedar-X System, Novel Electronics, Inc., St. Paul, MN) was utilized to measure the vertical ground reaction force at the baseline visit and at the end of the first intervention period (two months) gait evaluations for both the control arm and cane user arm. The control arm was not given a cane to use at home during the two month intervention period. Peak vertical force on the affected limb was measured in the laboratory setting when both control group and cane user group walked with and without a cane at baseline and at the end of the first intervention period (2 months).
Baseline and end of first intervention period (2 months)
Study Arms (2)
Single point cane
ACTIVE COMPARATORPeople with knee osteoarthritis underwent gait analysis with a cane
No cane
NO INTERVENTIONPatients with knee osteoarthritis undergo gait analysis without a cane
Interventions
Participants with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis will undergo gait evaluation with and without a single point cane.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years old
- Able to walk 30 feet without postural sway and able to stand unaided
- Knee pain on movement with a WOMAC pain subscale of \>35mm
- Documented osteoarthritis based on clinical and radiographic criteria
- Body Mass Index (BMI) \> 25.0 - 29.9
- Ability to understand verbal and written instructions
- Ability to give informed consent determined by assessment of cognitive status
You may not qualify if:
- Concurrent medical/arthritic disease that could confound or interfere with evaluation of pain or efficacy. History of knee trauma or surgery, including arthroscopic surgery, in the past six months
- Severe obesity (weight \> 300lbs)
- Upper body weakness
- Injury or amputation of the lower extremity joints
- History of other types of arthritis
- Spine, foot, or hip pain of sufficient magnitude to interfere with the evaluation of the index joint.
- Isolated patellofemoral disease manifested by primarily anterior knee pain in the absence of tibiofemoral radiographic finding.
- Poor health that would impair compliance or assessment such as shortness of breath with exertion
- Neurological disease including vestibular dysfunction, or impaired vision
- Patient has a history of any illness that, in the opinion of the investigator, might confound the results of the study or pose additional risk to the patient.
- Is unable to understand and complete the study questionnaires including visual analog scale (VAS) responses.
- Is unable to understand the study procedures.
- Investigator feels the patient is otherwise inappropriate for the study. The patient is participating in another clinical trial that would interfere with participation in this study
- Investigator feels the patient is otherwise inappropriate for the study.
- The patient is participating in another clinical trial that would interfere with participation in this study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, West LA
West Los Angeles, California, 90073, United States
Related Publications (2)
Fang MA, Heiney C, Yentes JM, Harada ND, Masih S, Perell-Gerson KL. Effects of contralateral versus ipsilateral cane use on gait in people with knee osteoarthritis. PM R. 2015 Apr;7(4):400-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2014.09.018. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
PMID: 25305371DERIVEDHarada N, Fong S, Heiney C, Yentes JM, Perell-Gerson KL, Fang MA. Evaluation of two cane instruments in older adults with knee osteoarthritis. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51(2):275-83. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2013.06.0140.
PMID: 24933725DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Had high drop out rate leading to small numbers of subjects analyzed.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Meika A. Fang, MD
- Organization
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Meika Fang, MD
VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, West LA
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 13, 2005
First Posted
September 22, 2005
Study Start
July 1, 2006
Primary Completion
September 1, 2008
Study Completion
October 1, 2008
Last Updated
November 1, 2017
Results First Posted
April 22, 2014
Record last verified: 2017-09