NCT00223795

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to assess whether the single point cane will relieve pain and disability in overweight or obese people with knee OA through altered joint biomechanics and what factors influence acceptance of cane use.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
53

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable obesity

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2006

Typical duration for not_applicable obesity

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 13, 2005

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 22, 2005

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2006

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2008

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2008

Completed
5.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 22, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

November 1, 2017

Status Verified

September 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

2.2 years

First QC Date

September 13, 2005

Results QC Date

September 24, 2013

Last Update Submit

September 29, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

CaneGaitObesityOsteoarthritisWalking Aids

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Peak Vertical Force on Affected Limb

    An in-shoe dynamic, pressure distribution system (Pedar-X System, Novel Electronics, Inc., St. Paul, MN) was utilized to measure the vertical ground reaction force at the baseline visit and at the end of the first intervention period (two months) gait evaluations for both the control arm and cane user arm. The control arm was not given a cane to use at home during the two month intervention period. Peak vertical force on the affected limb was measured in the laboratory setting when both control group and cane user group walked with and without a cane at baseline and at the end of the first intervention period (2 months).

    Baseline and end of first intervention period (2 months)

Study Arms (2)

Single point cane

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

People with knee osteoarthritis underwent gait analysis with a cane

Device: Single point cane

No cane

NO INTERVENTION

Patients with knee osteoarthritis undergo gait analysis without a cane

Interventions

Participants with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis will undergo gait evaluation with and without a single point cane.

Also known as: Guardian offset handled cane with sure grip
Single point cane

Eligibility Criteria

Age45 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • years old
  • Able to walk 30 feet without postural sway and able to stand unaided
  • Knee pain on movement with a WOMAC pain subscale of \>35mm
  • Documented osteoarthritis based on clinical and radiographic criteria
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) \> 25.0 - 29.9
  • Ability to understand verbal and written instructions
  • Ability to give informed consent determined by assessment of cognitive status

You may not qualify if:

  • Concurrent medical/arthritic disease that could confound or interfere with evaluation of pain or efficacy. History of knee trauma or surgery, including arthroscopic surgery, in the past six months
  • Severe obesity (weight \> 300lbs)
  • Upper body weakness
  • Injury or amputation of the lower extremity joints
  • History of other types of arthritis
  • Spine, foot, or hip pain of sufficient magnitude to interfere with the evaluation of the index joint.
  • Isolated patellofemoral disease manifested by primarily anterior knee pain in the absence of tibiofemoral radiographic finding.
  • Poor health that would impair compliance or assessment such as shortness of breath with exertion
  • Neurological disease including vestibular dysfunction, or impaired vision
  • Patient has a history of any illness that, in the opinion of the investigator, might confound the results of the study or pose additional risk to the patient.
  • Is unable to understand and complete the study questionnaires including visual analog scale (VAS) responses.
  • Is unable to understand the study procedures.
  • Investigator feels the patient is otherwise inappropriate for the study. The patient is participating in another clinical trial that would interfere with participation in this study
  • Investigator feels the patient is otherwise inappropriate for the study.
  • The patient is participating in another clinical trial that would interfere with participation in this study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, West LA

West Los Angeles, California, 90073, United States

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Fang MA, Heiney C, Yentes JM, Harada ND, Masih S, Perell-Gerson KL. Effects of contralateral versus ipsilateral cane use on gait in people with knee osteoarthritis. PM R. 2015 Apr;7(4):400-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2014.09.018. Epub 2014 Oct 8.

  • Harada N, Fong S, Heiney C, Yentes JM, Perell-Gerson KL, Fang MA. Evaluation of two cane instruments in older adults with knee osteoarthritis. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51(2):275-83. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2013.06.0140.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

ObesityOsteoarthritis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

OverweightOvernutritionNutrition DisordersNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesBody WeightSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic Diseases

Limitations and Caveats

Had high drop out rate leading to small numbers of subjects analyzed.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Meika A. Fang, MD
Organization
VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System

Study Officials

  • Meika Fang, MD

    VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, West LA

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
FED
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 13, 2005

First Posted

September 22, 2005

Study Start

July 1, 2006

Primary Completion

September 1, 2008

Study Completion

October 1, 2008

Last Updated

November 1, 2017

Results First Posted

April 22, 2014

Record last verified: 2017-09

Locations