NCT00324857

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the efficacy of interventions to improve understanding of knee replacement risks, benefits, and expected outcomes among AA primary care patients, increase willingness to consider knee replacement among AA primary care patients, and increase primary care referral rates for surgical consideration for AA patients who meet the indications for knee replacement.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
663

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2006

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

3 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 9, 2006

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 11, 2006

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2006

Completed
4.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2011

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2011

Completed
4.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

January 22, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

October 10, 2018

Status Verified

September 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

4.8 years

First QC Date

May 9, 2006

Results QC Date

December 18, 2014

Last Update Submit

September 10, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

Osteoarthritis, Kneeraceethnicityknee replacement

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in Willingness.

    Change in willingness assessed using the willingness likert scale. The primary outcome was change in patient willingness to undergo total knee replacement. The willingness rating is a 5-category ordinal response scale from "definitely not willing" to "definitely willing" which was later dichotomized for analysis. Responses "definitely" and "probably willing" were combined and compared to "unsure", "probably not willing", and "definitely not willing" combined.

    Follow-Up

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • To Examine and Compare the Effectiveness of the Proposed Intervention Strategies to Increase AA Patient Likelihood of Receiving Knee Replacement Within 12 Months of the Intervention.

    12 months

Study Arms (4)

Arm 1/Attention Control

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Subjects randomized to the attention control arm received a patient educational booklet about OA published by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases. This booklet provides a brief educational program that summarizes how to live with knee OA but does not specifically mention joint replacement

Other: Attention control

Arm 2/Decision Aid (DA)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Decision Aid Video: The research interventionist will show the participant the Dartmouth Knee OA Decision Aid video entitled "Treatment Choices for Knee Osteoarthritis." The video gives a detailed explanation of 1) the damage to the knee joint caused by OA; 2) treatment options including lifestyle changes, medications, injections, complementary therapy, and surgery; 3) the risks, benefits, and known efficacy of each treatment option.

Behavioral: Decision Aid Video

Arm 3/ Motivational Interview (MI)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Motivational Interviewing: The research intervention will conduct the fact-to-face MI session with the participant. This was used as a mechanism to help patients confront their thoughts about TKR and how to engage their primary care doctors about knee pain

Behavioral: Motivational Interviewing

Arm 4/ DA and MI

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Decision Aid Video: The research interventionist will show the participant the Dartmouth Knee OA Decision Aid video entitled "Treatment Choices for Knee Osteoarthritis." The video gives a detailed explanation of 1) the damage to the knee joint caused by OA; 2) treatment options including lifestyle changes, medications, injections, complementary therapy, and surgery; 3) the risks, benefits, and known efficacy of each treatment option. Motivational Interviewing: The research intervention will conduct the fact-to-face MI session with the participant. This was used as a mechanism to help patients confront their thoughts about TKR and how to engage their primary care doctors about knee pain

Behavioral: MI plus Decision aid

Interventions

The research interventionist will show the participant the Dartmouth Knee OA Decision Aid video entitled "Treatment Choices for Knee Osteoarthritis." The video gives a detailed explanation of 1) the damage to the knee joint caused by OA; 2) treatment options including lifestyle changes, medications, injections, complementary therapy, and surgery; 3) the risks, benefits, and known efficacy of each treatment option.

Also known as: DA
Arm 2/Decision Aid (DA)

The research intervention will conduct the fact-to-face MI session with the participant. The MI session will do the following things: 1) Assessing Readiness, Importance, and Confidence; 2) Eliciting Barriers, Concerns and Positive Motivational; 3) Summarizing Pros and Cons; 4) Assess Patient Values and Goals; 5) Provide a Menu of Options.

Also known as: MI
Arm 3/ Motivational Interview (MI)

Patient viewed the video and then underwent MI.

Arm 4/ DA and MI

patients received a booklet.

Arm 1/Attention Control

Eligibility Criteria

Age50 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Philadelphia VA Medical Center, Louis Stokes Cleveland VAMC, AA primary care patients \> age 50 who meet clinical criteria for knee OA (i.e., chronic, frequent knee pain based on the NHANES questions, WOMAC score = 39, and radiographic evidence of knee OA with K-L grade =2) are eligible for enrollment

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who have prior history of any:
  • major joint replacement
  • terminal illness (e.g., end-stage cancer)
  • physician-diagnosed inflammatory arthritis (i.e., rheumatoid arthritis, connective tissue disease, ankylosing spondylitis or other seronegative spondyloarthropathy)
  • contra-indications to replacement surgery (e.g., lower extremity paralysis as result of stroke)
  • Patients who are not willing to be randomized
  • Do not have the presence of knee OA
  • Do not have telephone service

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

VA Medical Center, Cleveland

Cleveland, Ohio, 44106-3800, United States

Location

VA Medical Center, Philadelphia

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States

Location

Division of General Medicine

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Ibrahim SA. Racial variations in the utilization of knee and hip joint replacement: an introduction and review of the most recent literature. Curr Orthop Pract. 2010 Mar;21(2):126-131. doi: 10.1097/BCO.0b013e3181d08223.

    PMID: 21132110BACKGROUND
  • Emejuaiwe N, Jones AC, Ibrahim SA, Kwoh CK. Disparities in joint replacement utilization: a quality of care issue. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007 Nov-Dec;25(6 Suppl 47):44-9.

    PMID: 18021506BACKGROUND
  • Ibrahim SA. Decision Aids and Elective Joint Replacement - How Knowledge Affects Utilization. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 29;376(26):2509-2511. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1703432. No abstract available.

  • Ibrahim SA, Hanusa BH, Hannon MJ, Kresevic D, Long J, Kent Kwoh C. Willingness and access to joint replacement among African American patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized, controlled intervention. Arthritis Rheum. 2013 May;65(5):1253-61. doi: 10.1002/art.37899.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

OsteoarthritisOsteoarthritis, Knee

Interventions

Motivational InterviewingDecision Support Techniques

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Directive CounselingCounselingMental Health ServicesBehavioral Disciplines and ActivitiesHealth ServicesHealth Care Facilities Workforce and ServicesInvestigative Techniques

Results Point of Contact

Title
Said A. Ibrahim, MD, MPH
Organization
VA

Study Officials

  • Said A. Ibrahim, MD MPH

    VA Medical Center, Philadelphia

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • C. Kent Kwoh, MD

    University of Arizona

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
FACTORIAL
Sponsor Type
FED
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 9, 2006

First Posted

May 11, 2006

Study Start

September 1, 2006

Primary Completion

July 1, 2011

Study Completion

September 1, 2011

Last Updated

October 10, 2018

Results First Posted

January 22, 2016

Record last verified: 2018-09

Locations