Educational Intervention for Knee Pain
Knee Replacement Disparity: A Randomized, Controlled Intervention
1 other identifier
interventional
663
1 country
3
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the efficacy of interventions to improve understanding of knee replacement risks, benefits, and expected outcomes among AA primary care patients, increase willingness to consider knee replacement among AA primary care patients, and increase primary care referral rates for surgical consideration for AA patients who meet the indications for knee replacement.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2006
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 9, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 11, 2006
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 22, 2016
CompletedOctober 10, 2018
September 1, 2018
4.8 years
May 9, 2006
December 18, 2014
September 10, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Willingness.
Change in willingness assessed using the willingness likert scale. The primary outcome was change in patient willingness to undergo total knee replacement. The willingness rating is a 5-category ordinal response scale from "definitely not willing" to "definitely willing" which was later dichotomized for analysis. Responses "definitely" and "probably willing" were combined and compared to "unsure", "probably not willing", and "definitely not willing" combined.
Follow-Up
Secondary Outcomes (1)
To Examine and Compare the Effectiveness of the Proposed Intervention Strategies to Increase AA Patient Likelihood of Receiving Knee Replacement Within 12 Months of the Intervention.
12 months
Study Arms (4)
Arm 1/Attention Control
PLACEBO COMPARATORSubjects randomized to the attention control arm received a patient educational booklet about OA published by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases. This booklet provides a brief educational program that summarizes how to live with knee OA but does not specifically mention joint replacement
Arm 2/Decision Aid (DA)
ACTIVE COMPARATORDecision Aid Video: The research interventionist will show the participant the Dartmouth Knee OA Decision Aid video entitled "Treatment Choices for Knee Osteoarthritis." The video gives a detailed explanation of 1) the damage to the knee joint caused by OA; 2) treatment options including lifestyle changes, medications, injections, complementary therapy, and surgery; 3) the risks, benefits, and known efficacy of each treatment option.
Arm 3/ Motivational Interview (MI)
ACTIVE COMPARATORMotivational Interviewing: The research intervention will conduct the fact-to-face MI session with the participant. This was used as a mechanism to help patients confront their thoughts about TKR and how to engage their primary care doctors about knee pain
Arm 4/ DA and MI
ACTIVE COMPARATORDecision Aid Video: The research interventionist will show the participant the Dartmouth Knee OA Decision Aid video entitled "Treatment Choices for Knee Osteoarthritis." The video gives a detailed explanation of 1) the damage to the knee joint caused by OA; 2) treatment options including lifestyle changes, medications, injections, complementary therapy, and surgery; 3) the risks, benefits, and known efficacy of each treatment option. Motivational Interviewing: The research intervention will conduct the fact-to-face MI session with the participant. This was used as a mechanism to help patients confront their thoughts about TKR and how to engage their primary care doctors about knee pain
Interventions
The research interventionist will show the participant the Dartmouth Knee OA Decision Aid video entitled "Treatment Choices for Knee Osteoarthritis." The video gives a detailed explanation of 1) the damage to the knee joint caused by OA; 2) treatment options including lifestyle changes, medications, injections, complementary therapy, and surgery; 3) the risks, benefits, and known efficacy of each treatment option.
The research intervention will conduct the fact-to-face MI session with the participant. The MI session will do the following things: 1) Assessing Readiness, Importance, and Confidence; 2) Eliciting Barriers, Concerns and Positive Motivational; 3) Summarizing Pros and Cons; 4) Assess Patient Values and Goals; 5) Provide a Menu of Options.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Philadelphia VA Medical Center, Louis Stokes Cleveland VAMC, AA primary care patients \> age 50 who meet clinical criteria for knee OA (i.e., chronic, frequent knee pain based on the NHANES questions, WOMAC score = 39, and radiographic evidence of knee OA with K-L grade =2) are eligible for enrollment
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who have prior history of any:
- major joint replacement
- terminal illness (e.g., end-stage cancer)
- physician-diagnosed inflammatory arthritis (i.e., rheumatoid arthritis, connective tissue disease, ankylosing spondylitis or other seronegative spondyloarthropathy)
- contra-indications to replacement surgery (e.g., lower extremity paralysis as result of stroke)
- Patients who are not willing to be randomized
- Do not have the presence of knee OA
- Do not have telephone service
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
VA Medical Center, Cleveland
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106-3800, United States
VA Medical Center, Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
Division of General Medicine
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States
Related Publications (4)
Ibrahim SA. Racial variations in the utilization of knee and hip joint replacement: an introduction and review of the most recent literature. Curr Orthop Pract. 2010 Mar;21(2):126-131. doi: 10.1097/BCO.0b013e3181d08223.
PMID: 21132110BACKGROUNDEmejuaiwe N, Jones AC, Ibrahim SA, Kwoh CK. Disparities in joint replacement utilization: a quality of care issue. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007 Nov-Dec;25(6 Suppl 47):44-9.
PMID: 18021506BACKGROUNDIbrahim SA. Decision Aids and Elective Joint Replacement - How Knowledge Affects Utilization. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 29;376(26):2509-2511. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1703432. No abstract available.
PMID: 28657869RESULTIbrahim SA, Hanusa BH, Hannon MJ, Kresevic D, Long J, Kent Kwoh C. Willingness and access to joint replacement among African American patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized, controlled intervention. Arthritis Rheum. 2013 May;65(5):1253-61. doi: 10.1002/art.37899.
PMID: 23613362DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Said A. Ibrahim, MD, MPH
- Organization
- VA
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Said A. Ibrahim, MD MPH
VA Medical Center, Philadelphia
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
C. Kent Kwoh, MD
University of Arizona
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 9, 2006
First Posted
May 11, 2006
Study Start
September 1, 2006
Primary Completion
July 1, 2011
Study Completion
September 1, 2011
Last Updated
October 10, 2018
Results First Posted
January 22, 2016
Record last verified: 2018-09